Dysphagia Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A PearlDiver Analysis of Incidence, Risk Factors, and Interventions.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
James Cochran, Nancy Deng, Ameer Tabbaa, Afshin Razi, Sara Abu-Ghanem
{"title":"Dysphagia Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A PearlDiver Analysis of Incidence, Risk Factors, and Interventions.","authors":"James Cochran, Nancy Deng, Ameer Tabbaa, Afshin Razi, Sara Abu-Ghanem","doi":"10.1007/s00455-025-10867-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a well-established surgical procedure, with wide variation in reported postoperative dysphagia rates (1-79%). No standardized guidelines exist for screening, diagnosis, and treatment of postoperative ACDF dysphagia. The goal of the current study is to utilize a large database of US healthcare insurance claims to investigate incidence of dysphagia post-ACDF as well as risk factors for dysphagia and interventions performed in a large patient cohort. PearlDiver database was used to identify patients without preoperative dysphagia undergoing ACDF between 2010 and 2022 and create cohorts of patients with and without postoperative ACDF dysphagia. International Classification of Disease version 9 and 10 (ICD-9 and ICD-10), and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to retrieve patient records. The two cohorts were compared in terms of age, gender, comorbidities, prior neck surgery, postoperative vocal fold paralysis, and dysphagia related interventions. OR with 95% CI were calculated, stratifying by various risk factors. Prevalence of various postoperative diagnoses and interventions were calculated. Of 618,170 patients undergoing primary ACDF from 2010 to 2022, 88,899 (14.4%) developed postoperative dysphagia. Females, smokers, diabetics, and obese patients had higher odds of developing post ACDF dysphagia (OR 1.14, 2.51, 2.18, 2.50 respectively). 3% of patients with post ACDF dysphagia had new postoperative vocal fold motion impairment (VFMI) versus 0.3% without dysphagia (OR 8.69). Within the dysphagia cohort,14.9% underwent laryngoscopy, 19.0% underwent MBSS, 0.80% underwent FEES, and 5.2% received swallow therapy. Dysphagia is commonly diagnosed after ACDF, with females, smokers, diabetics, and obese patients having the highest odds of diagnosis. Yet, a low percentage of patients are being referred for evaluation or treatment. Providers performing ACDF should consider screening protocols and early referral to providers offering interventions for dysphagia diagnosis and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dysphagia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-025-10867-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a well-established surgical procedure, with wide variation in reported postoperative dysphagia rates (1-79%). No standardized guidelines exist for screening, diagnosis, and treatment of postoperative ACDF dysphagia. The goal of the current study is to utilize a large database of US healthcare insurance claims to investigate incidence of dysphagia post-ACDF as well as risk factors for dysphagia and interventions performed in a large patient cohort. PearlDiver database was used to identify patients without preoperative dysphagia undergoing ACDF between 2010 and 2022 and create cohorts of patients with and without postoperative ACDF dysphagia. International Classification of Disease version 9 and 10 (ICD-9 and ICD-10), and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to retrieve patient records. The two cohorts were compared in terms of age, gender, comorbidities, prior neck surgery, postoperative vocal fold paralysis, and dysphagia related interventions. OR with 95% CI were calculated, stratifying by various risk factors. Prevalence of various postoperative diagnoses and interventions were calculated. Of 618,170 patients undergoing primary ACDF from 2010 to 2022, 88,899 (14.4%) developed postoperative dysphagia. Females, smokers, diabetics, and obese patients had higher odds of developing post ACDF dysphagia (OR 1.14, 2.51, 2.18, 2.50 respectively). 3% of patients with post ACDF dysphagia had new postoperative vocal fold motion impairment (VFMI) versus 0.3% without dysphagia (OR 8.69). Within the dysphagia cohort,14.9% underwent laryngoscopy, 19.0% underwent MBSS, 0.80% underwent FEES, and 5.2% received swallow therapy. Dysphagia is commonly diagnosed after ACDF, with females, smokers, diabetics, and obese patients having the highest odds of diagnosis. Yet, a low percentage of patients are being referred for evaluation or treatment. Providers performing ACDF should consider screening protocols and early referral to providers offering interventions for dysphagia diagnosis and treatment.

颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术后的吞咽困难:发生率、危险因素和干预措施的PearlDiver分析。
前路颈椎椎间盘切除术融合术(ACDF)是一种成熟的外科手术,术后吞咽困难的发生率差异很大(1-79%)。对于ACDF术后吞咽困难的筛查、诊断和治疗尚无标准化的指南。本研究的目的是利用美国医疗保险索赔的大型数据库来调查acdf后吞咽困难的发生率,以及吞咽困难的危险因素和在大型患者队列中实施的干预措施。PearlDiver数据库用于识别2010年至2022年间接受ACDF的术前无吞咽困难的患者,并创建有和没有术后ACDF吞咽困难的患者队列。使用国际疾病分类第9版和第10版(ICD-9和ICD-10)以及现行程序术语(CPT)代码检索患者记录。两个队列在年龄、性别、合并症、既往颈部手术、术后声带麻痹和吞咽困难相关干预措施方面进行比较。计算OR和95% CI,按各种危险因素分层。计算各种术后诊断和干预措施的患病率。2010年至2022年,618,170例接受原发性ACDF的患者中,88,899例(14.4%)出现术后吞咽困难。女性、吸烟者、糖尿病患者和肥胖患者发生ACDF后吞咽困难的几率更高(OR分别为1.14、2.51、2.18、2.50)。ACDF术后吞咽困难患者中有3%的患者术后出现新的声带运动障碍(VFMI),而无吞咽困难的患者为0.3% (OR 8.69)。在吞咽困难队列中,14.9%接受喉镜检查,19.0%接受MBSS治疗,0.80%接受FEES治疗,5.2%接受吞咽治疗。吞咽困难通常在ACDF后被诊断出来,女性、吸烟者、糖尿病患者和肥胖患者的诊断几率最高。然而,只有很低比例的患者被转诊进行评估或治疗。实施ACDF的提供者应考虑筛查方案和早期转诊给提供吞咽困难诊断和治疗干预措施的提供者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dysphagia
Dysphagia 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dysphagia aims to serve as a voice for the benefit of the patient. The journal is devoted exclusively to swallowing and its disorders. The purpose of the journal is to provide a source of information to the flourishing dysphagia community. Over the past years, the field of dysphagia has grown rapidly, and the community of dysphagia researchers have galvanized with ambition to represent dysphagia patients. In addition to covering a myriad of disciplines in medicine and speech pathology, the following topics are also covered, but are not limited to: bio-engineering, deglutition, esophageal motility, immunology, and neuro-gastroenterology. The journal aims to foster a growing need for further dysphagia investigation, to disseminate knowledge through research, and to stimulate communication among interested professionals. The journal publishes original papers, technical and instrumental notes, letters to the editor, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信