Levels of pesticide residues in sediment and soils of Fogera district, Northwestern Ethiopia: indications of some risks to local biota.

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Abebaw Abaineh, Dessalegn Ejigu, Minaleshewa Atlabachew, Balew Yibel Zeleke, Eshete Dejen, Gashaw Tilahun, Kidanemariam Teklay Hilawea
{"title":"Levels of pesticide residues in sediment and soils of Fogera district, Northwestern Ethiopia: indications of some risks to local biota.","authors":"Abebaw Abaineh, Dessalegn Ejigu, Minaleshewa Atlabachew, Balew Yibel Zeleke, Eshete Dejen, Gashaw Tilahun, Kidanemariam Teklay Hilawea","doi":"10.1007/s10646-025-02944-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to analyze pesticide residues in the sediments and soils of Fogera District, Ethiopia, to evaluate the risks posed to organisms that dwell in these environments. A total of 7 sediments from rivers, canals and ponds, and 13 soil samples from irrigated farmlands were collected from April to June 2023 using a cross-sectional study design. The samples were collected from 0-8 cm depth in both sediments and soils using scoops and spoons. Analytes were prepared following the buffered procedures, extracted following the Quick, Effective, Cheap, Rugged, and Safe (QuEChERS) method and extracts were analyzed using the triple quad gas chromatography-mass spectrometry technique. Twenty-seven pesticides were identified and quantified both in the sediment and soil samples. More than 85% of the pesticide residues in the sediment and soil samples were organochlorines and organophosphates. The concentrations of the organochlorine and organophosphate pesticides in sediments ranged from ND to 9.94 µg/kg and ND to 12.12 µg/kg, respectively. Similarly, the concentration of the organochlorine and organophosphate pesticides in the soil samples ranged from ND to 13.69 µg/kg and ND to 10.70 µg/kg, respectively. Though the mean concentration difference between the pesticide residues in the sediment and soil samples was insignificant (t (18) = -0.871, p = 0.395), the risks of pesticide residues in sediments to aquatic biota were much higher than those in the soil biota. Of the 27 pesticides detected in sediments, 24 of them pose a higher risk and 1 moderate risk to aquatic biota. The risk quotients of Endrin aldehyde and Endrin ketone in sediments were not calculated due to the lack of endpoint concentrations. In a general case scenario, the risk quotients of the pesticides ranged from 0.80 (Para-methyl) to 21086.43 (Deltamethrin) in sediments and from 0.001 (Malathion) to 17.689 (Profenofos) in soils. The pesticide residues in sediments and soils might pose adverse effects on the biota of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Therefore, a transparent pesticide supply chain and deploying qualified experts to monitor and inspect the types of pesticides in use and the pesticide application practices, detail studies on the level of toxicities of the commonly applied pesticides to the biota of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, and enforcing the pesticide laws are required to reduce the adverse effects of pesticides.</p>","PeriodicalId":11497,"journal":{"name":"Ecotoxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-025-02944-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze pesticide residues in the sediments and soils of Fogera District, Ethiopia, to evaluate the risks posed to organisms that dwell in these environments. A total of 7 sediments from rivers, canals and ponds, and 13 soil samples from irrigated farmlands were collected from April to June 2023 using a cross-sectional study design. The samples were collected from 0-8 cm depth in both sediments and soils using scoops and spoons. Analytes were prepared following the buffered procedures, extracted following the Quick, Effective, Cheap, Rugged, and Safe (QuEChERS) method and extracts were analyzed using the triple quad gas chromatography-mass spectrometry technique. Twenty-seven pesticides were identified and quantified both in the sediment and soil samples. More than 85% of the pesticide residues in the sediment and soil samples were organochlorines and organophosphates. The concentrations of the organochlorine and organophosphate pesticides in sediments ranged from ND to 9.94 µg/kg and ND to 12.12 µg/kg, respectively. Similarly, the concentration of the organochlorine and organophosphate pesticides in the soil samples ranged from ND to 13.69 µg/kg and ND to 10.70 µg/kg, respectively. Though the mean concentration difference between the pesticide residues in the sediment and soil samples was insignificant (t (18) = -0.871, p = 0.395), the risks of pesticide residues in sediments to aquatic biota were much higher than those in the soil biota. Of the 27 pesticides detected in sediments, 24 of them pose a higher risk and 1 moderate risk to aquatic biota. The risk quotients of Endrin aldehyde and Endrin ketone in sediments were not calculated due to the lack of endpoint concentrations. In a general case scenario, the risk quotients of the pesticides ranged from 0.80 (Para-methyl) to 21086.43 (Deltamethrin) in sediments and from 0.001 (Malathion) to 17.689 (Profenofos) in soils. The pesticide residues in sediments and soils might pose adverse effects on the biota of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Therefore, a transparent pesticide supply chain and deploying qualified experts to monitor and inspect the types of pesticides in use and the pesticide application practices, detail studies on the level of toxicities of the commonly applied pesticides to the biota of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, and enforcing the pesticide laws are required to reduce the adverse effects of pesticides.

埃塞俄比亚西北部福格拉地区沉积物和土壤中的农药残留水平:对当地生物群的一些风险的迹象。
本研究旨在分析埃塞俄比亚Fogera地区沉积物和土壤中的农药残留,以评估生活在这些环境中的生物所面临的风险。采用横断面研究设计,于2023年4 - 6月采集了河流、沟渠和池塘沉积物7份,灌溉农田土壤13份。样品是用勺子和勺子从0-8厘米深的沉积物和土壤中收集的。按照缓冲程序制备分析物,按照快速、有效、廉价、坚固和安全(QuEChERS)方法提取,并使用三重四气相色谱-质谱技术分析提取物。在沉积物和土壤样品中鉴定和量化了27种农药。沉积物和土壤样品中超过85%的农药残留是有机氯和有机磷。沉积物中有机氯和有机磷农药的浓度分别为ND ~ 9.94µg/kg和ND ~ 12.12µg/kg。同样,土壤样品中有机氯和有机磷农药的浓度分别为ND ~ 13.69µg/kg和ND ~ 10.70µg/kg。虽然沉积物中农药残留与土壤样品的平均浓度差异不显著(t (18) = -0.871, p = 0.395),但沉积物中农药残留对水生生物群的危害远大于对土壤生物群的危害。在沉积物中检测到的27种农药中,有24种对水生生物群构成较高风险,1种构成中等风险。由于缺乏终点浓度,未计算沉积物中Endrin醛和Endrin酮的风险商。在一般情况下,沉积物中农药的风险商数为0.80(对甲基)至21086.43(溴氰菊酯),土壤中农药的风险商数为0.001(马拉硫磷)至17.689(丙烯磷)。沉积物和土壤中的农药残留可能对水生和陆地生态系统的生物群造成不利影响。因此,需要建立透明的农药供应链,部署合格的专家来监测和检查使用中的农药类型和农药施用做法,详细研究常用农药对水生和陆地生态系统生物群的毒性水平,并执行农药法律,以减少农药的不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecotoxicology
Ecotoxicology 环境科学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Ecotoxicology is an international journal devoted to the publication of fundamental research on the effects of toxic chemicals on populations, communities and terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems. It aims to elucidate mechanisms and processes whereby chemicals exert their effects on ecosystems and the impact caused at the population or community level. The journal is not biased with respect to taxon or biome, and papers that indicate possible new approaches to regulation and control of toxic chemicals and those aiding in formulating ways of conserving threatened species are particularly welcome. Studies on individuals should demonstrate linkage to population effects in clear and quantitative ways. Laboratory studies must show a clear linkage to specific field situations. The journal includes not only original research papers but technical notes and review articles, both invited and submitted. A strong, broadly based editorial board ensures as wide an international coverage as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信