Longstanding eating disorders: insights and innovations in severe and enduring illness.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Phillipa Hay, Kelly M Dann, Stephen Touyz
{"title":"Longstanding eating disorders: insights and innovations in severe and enduring illness.","authors":"Phillipa Hay, Kelly M Dann, Stephen Touyz","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review synthesizes recent findings on recent developments in the understanding and treatment of longstanding eating disorders (L-ED).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Following a systematic search 42 papers were identified that included 5 scoping or systematic reviews. The majority were about phenomenology and treatment. Co-design and perspectives of people with lived experience expertise were common. Research on conceptualization suggests some consistency that duration is a necessary but insufficient defining feature, and to broaden from a symptom focus to the inter- and intra-personal experience of L-ED. There has been little progress however on a consensus for the defining features or the aetiological understanding of L-ED or longstanding anorexia nervosa (L-AN). There are several new collaborative and person-centred models of care and therapeutic approaches, alongside developments in treatments, mostly biological however, and most of L-AN, e.g. ketamine, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS). There remains an acute need to test these in controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>L-EDs continue to present unique challenges. The involvement of people with lived experience expertise in research has supported the increasing emphasis on exploring improved longer-term outcomes and meaningful trajectories of recovery, with personalized and integrated approaches to care being the new holy grail.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000001036","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review synthesizes recent findings on recent developments in the understanding and treatment of longstanding eating disorders (L-ED).

Recent findings: Following a systematic search 42 papers were identified that included 5 scoping or systematic reviews. The majority were about phenomenology and treatment. Co-design and perspectives of people with lived experience expertise were common. Research on conceptualization suggests some consistency that duration is a necessary but insufficient defining feature, and to broaden from a symptom focus to the inter- and intra-personal experience of L-ED. There has been little progress however on a consensus for the defining features or the aetiological understanding of L-ED or longstanding anorexia nervosa (L-AN). There are several new collaborative and person-centred models of care and therapeutic approaches, alongside developments in treatments, mostly biological however, and most of L-AN, e.g. ketamine, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS). There remains an acute need to test these in controlled trials.

Summary: L-EDs continue to present unique challenges. The involvement of people with lived experience expertise in research has supported the increasing emphasis on exploring improved longer-term outcomes and meaningful trajectories of recovery, with personalized and integrated approaches to care being the new holy grail.

长期饮食失调:对严重和持久疾病的见解和创新。
综述目的:本文综述了长期饮食失调(L-ED)的认识和治疗方面的最新进展。最近的发现:经过系统检索,确定了42篇论文,其中包括5篇范围或系统综述。大部分是关于现象学和治疗的。共同设计和具有生活经验专业知识的人的观点很常见。概念化研究表明,持续时间是一个必要但不够的定义特征,并且从症状焦点扩展到L-ED的人际和个人内部体验。然而,关于L-ED或长期神经性厌食症(L-AN)的定义特征或病因学理解的共识进展甚微。有几种新的协作和以人为中心的护理和治疗方法模式,以及治疗方法的发展,主要是生物治疗,但大多数是L-AN,例如氯胺酮,重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)和深部脑刺激(DBS)。目前仍迫切需要在对照试验中对这些方法进行检验。L-EDs继续面临着独特的挑战。有生活经验的专业人士参与研究,支持了对探索改善的长期结果和有意义的康复轨迹的日益重视,个性化和综合的护理方法成为新的圣杯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Current Opinion in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychiatry is an easy-to-digest bimonthly journal covering the most interesting and important advances in the field of psychiatry. Eight sections on mental health disorders including schizophrenia, neurodevelopmental disorders and eating disorders, are presented alongside five area-specific sections, offering an expert evaluation on the most exciting developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信