Differential associations of passive and active screen time with academic performance and social function among physically active youth: a cross-sectional analysis.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Complementary therapies in medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ctim.2025.103226
Benlu Liao, Maolin Tian
{"title":"Differential associations of passive and active screen time with academic performance and social function among physically active youth: a cross-sectional analysis.","authors":"Benlu Liao, Maolin Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.ctim.2025.103226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While physical activity (PA) provides established benefits for youth (children and adolescents) development, the differential effects of mentally passive versus mentally active screen time (ST) on academic achievement and social behavior among physically active youth remain unclear. This study examined associations between different types of ST and developmental outcomes in youth who met the PA guideline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the 2016-2017 National Survey of Children's Health were analyzed, including 9967 participants aged 6-17 years who met the PA guideline (≥ 60 min daily) ST was categorized as mentally passive (TV-based) ST and mentally active (computer-based) ST. Academic achievement was assessed through curiosity, psychological resilience, and memory difficulties. Social behaviors consisted of bullying victimization, friendship difficulties, and argumentative behavior. All data were collected through caregiver-completed questionnaires. Multi-variable logistic regression analyses were conducted, controlling for demographic factors including age, sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, premature birth and parental education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mentally passive (TV-based) ST demonstrated predominantly negative associations across all social-cognitive domains. Heavy users (≥4 h daily) showed significantly lower curiosity (OR=0.38, 95 % CI: 0.17-0.89), reduced psychological resilience, nearly four times higher odds of memory difficulties (OR=3.80, 95 % CI: 1.65-8.78), and increased bullying victimization (OR=2.93, 95 % CI: 1.52-5.67). However, mentally active (computer-based) ST showed more complex patterns: light users (<1 h daily) demonstrated higher curiosity and resilience compared to non-users, while heavy users (≥4 h daily) experienced negative outcomes including reduced resilience (OR=0.54, 95 % CI: 0.34-0.87) and increased social difficulties. Both types of ST at high usage levels were associated with increased argumentative behavior (passive ST: OR=2.74, 95 % CI: 1.53-4.91; active ST: OR=2.99, 95 % CI: 1.89-4.74).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among physically active youth, mentally passive and mentally active ST demonstrate distinct associations with academic and social outcomes. Mentally Passive ST shows predominantly negative associations across all domains, while mentally active ST exhibits potential benefits at low usage but negative effects at high usage levels. These findings suggest that ST recommendations should consider both duration and type of sedentary activities, as PA alone may not fully protect against the adverse effects of excessive ST, particularly mentally passive screen exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":10545,"journal":{"name":"Complementary therapies in medicine","volume":" ","pages":"103226"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary therapies in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2025.103226","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While physical activity (PA) provides established benefits for youth (children and adolescents) development, the differential effects of mentally passive versus mentally active screen time (ST) on academic achievement and social behavior among physically active youth remain unclear. This study examined associations between different types of ST and developmental outcomes in youth who met the PA guideline.

Methods: Data from the 2016-2017 National Survey of Children's Health were analyzed, including 9967 participants aged 6-17 years who met the PA guideline (≥ 60 min daily) ST was categorized as mentally passive (TV-based) ST and mentally active (computer-based) ST. Academic achievement was assessed through curiosity, psychological resilience, and memory difficulties. Social behaviors consisted of bullying victimization, friendship difficulties, and argumentative behavior. All data were collected through caregiver-completed questionnaires. Multi-variable logistic regression analyses were conducted, controlling for demographic factors including age, sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, premature birth and parental education.

Results: Mentally passive (TV-based) ST demonstrated predominantly negative associations across all social-cognitive domains. Heavy users (≥4 h daily) showed significantly lower curiosity (OR=0.38, 95 % CI: 0.17-0.89), reduced psychological resilience, nearly four times higher odds of memory difficulties (OR=3.80, 95 % CI: 1.65-8.78), and increased bullying victimization (OR=2.93, 95 % CI: 1.52-5.67). However, mentally active (computer-based) ST showed more complex patterns: light users (<1 h daily) demonstrated higher curiosity and resilience compared to non-users, while heavy users (≥4 h daily) experienced negative outcomes including reduced resilience (OR=0.54, 95 % CI: 0.34-0.87) and increased social difficulties. Both types of ST at high usage levels were associated with increased argumentative behavior (passive ST: OR=2.74, 95 % CI: 1.53-4.91; active ST: OR=2.99, 95 % CI: 1.89-4.74).

Conclusions: Among physically active youth, mentally passive and mentally active ST demonstrate distinct associations with academic and social outcomes. Mentally Passive ST shows predominantly negative associations across all domains, while mentally active ST exhibits potential benefits at low usage but negative effects at high usage levels. These findings suggest that ST recommendations should consider both duration and type of sedentary activities, as PA alone may not fully protect against the adverse effects of excessive ST, particularly mentally passive screen exposure.

积极运动青少年被动和主动屏幕时间与学业成绩和社会功能的差异关联:一项横断面分析。
背景:虽然身体活动(PA)为青少年(儿童和青少年)的发展提供了公认的好处,但心理被动与心理主动屏幕时间(ST)对身体活跃青少年学业成绩和社会行为的差异影响尚不清楚。本研究考察了符合PA指南的青少年不同类型ST与发育结果之间的关系。方法:分析2016-2017年全国儿童健康调查的数据,包括9967名6-17岁的参与者,他们符合PA指南(每天≥60分钟)ST被分为心理被动ST(基于电视的)ST和心理主动ST(基于计算机的)ST。社会行为包括欺凌受害、友谊困难和争论行为。所有数据均通过护理人员填写的问卷收集。采用多变量logistic回归分析,控制人口统计学因素,包括年龄、性别、种族、社会经济地位、早产和父母教育程度。结果:心理被动(基于电视的)ST在所有社会认知领域都表现出主要的负相关。重度使用者(每天≥4小时)的好奇心明显降低(OR=0.38, 95% CI: 0.17-0.89),心理弹性降低,记忆困难的几率增加近4倍(OR=3.80, 95% CI: 1.65-8.78),受欺凌的几率增加(OR=2.93, 95% CI: 1.52-5.67)。结论:在身体活跃的青少年中,心理被动和心理活跃的性行为与学业和社会成就有明显的关联。心理被动ST在所有领域都表现出主要的负面关联,而心理主动ST在低使用率下表现出潜在的好处,但在高使用率下表现出负面影响。这些发现表明,ST建议应考虑久坐活动的持续时间和类型,因为单靠PA可能无法完全预防过度ST的不利影响,特别是精神被动屏幕暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Complementary therapies in medicine
Complementary therapies in medicine 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
101
审稿时长
112 days
期刊介绍: Complementary Therapies in Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal that has considerable appeal to anyone who seeks objective and critical information on complementary therapies or who wishes to deepen their understanding of these approaches. It will be of particular interest to healthcare practitioners including family practitioners, complementary therapists, nurses, and physiotherapists; to academics including social scientists and CAM researchers; to healthcare managers; and to patients. Complementary Therapies in Medicine aims to publish valid, relevant and rigorous research and serious discussion articles with the main purpose of improving healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信