Comparison of tracking and fixed photovoltaic systems for soil quality improvement in desert: A 5-year field study.

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Science of the Total Environment Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-06 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180221
Yinzhu Liu, Shuangjin Ma, Yu Miao, Yijun Liu, Shiqi Wei, Jieqiong Su, Yahu Hu
{"title":"Comparison of tracking and fixed photovoltaic systems for soil quality improvement in desert: A 5-year field study.","authors":"Yinzhu Liu, Shuangjin Ma, Yu Miao, Yijun Liu, Shiqi Wei, Jieqiong Su, Yahu Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deserts offer abundant sunlight and space ideal for photovoltaic (PV) energy; however, the long-term impact of PV systems on desert soil quality remains unclear. This 5-year Kubuqi Desert study compared tracking (oblique/flat single-axis) and fixed-tilt (adjustable/fixed-angle) PV systems to uncovered control plots (with identical land preparation). Compared to the control, the soil moisture and bulk density remained unchanged overall but varied significantly beneath and between the panels under the fixed systems. Both PV types significantly increased soil organic carbon, with tracking systems also boosting available nitrogen and carbon (β-glucosidase) and nitrogen-cycling (leucine aminopeptidase) enzyme activities. Conversely, fixed systems significantly decreased soil calcium carbonate, total phosphorus, available phosphorus, and available potassium. Soil pH was significantly lower under the tracking system than under the fixed system. Partial least squares discriminant analysis distinguished the oblique single-axis tracking system, linking it to lower pH and enhanced enzyme-driven nutrient cycling, which was supported by Mantel tests and Pearson correlations. Consequently, both the oblique and flat single-axis tracking systems significantly increased the soil quality index compared to that of the fixed systems and control. These findings indicate that tracking PV systems create more uniform soil conditions and drive positive changes in soil chemical and biological properties, thereby improving desert soil quality more effectively than fixed systems do.</p>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"997 ","pages":"180221"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180221","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deserts offer abundant sunlight and space ideal for photovoltaic (PV) energy; however, the long-term impact of PV systems on desert soil quality remains unclear. This 5-year Kubuqi Desert study compared tracking (oblique/flat single-axis) and fixed-tilt (adjustable/fixed-angle) PV systems to uncovered control plots (with identical land preparation). Compared to the control, the soil moisture and bulk density remained unchanged overall but varied significantly beneath and between the panels under the fixed systems. Both PV types significantly increased soil organic carbon, with tracking systems also boosting available nitrogen and carbon (β-glucosidase) and nitrogen-cycling (leucine aminopeptidase) enzyme activities. Conversely, fixed systems significantly decreased soil calcium carbonate, total phosphorus, available phosphorus, and available potassium. Soil pH was significantly lower under the tracking system than under the fixed system. Partial least squares discriminant analysis distinguished the oblique single-axis tracking system, linking it to lower pH and enhanced enzyme-driven nutrient cycling, which was supported by Mantel tests and Pearson correlations. Consequently, both the oblique and flat single-axis tracking systems significantly increased the soil quality index compared to that of the fixed systems and control. These findings indicate that tracking PV systems create more uniform soil conditions and drive positive changes in soil chemical and biological properties, thereby improving desert soil quality more effectively than fixed systems do.

跟踪与固定光伏系统在沙漠土壤质量改善中的比较:5年实地研究。
沙漠为光伏发电提供了充足的阳光和理想的空间;然而,光伏系统对沙漠土壤质量的长期影响尚不清楚。这项为期5年的库布其沙漠研究比较了跟踪(斜/平单轴)和固定倾斜(可调/固定角度)光伏系统与未覆盖的对照地块(具有相同的土地准备)。与对照组相比,土壤湿度和容重总体上保持不变,但在固定系统下面板下和面板之间存在显著差异。两种PV类型都显著增加了土壤有机碳,跟踪系统也提高了有效氮和碳(β-葡萄糖苷酶)和氮循环(亮氨酸氨基肽酶)酶的活性。相反,固定系统显著降低土壤碳酸钙、全磷、速效磷和速效钾。土壤pH值在跟踪制度下显著低于固定制度下。偏最小二乘判别分析区分了斜单轴跟踪系统,将其与较低的pH和增强的酶驱动的养分循环联系起来,这得到了Mantel检验和Pearson相关性的支持。因此,与固定系统和对照相比,倾斜和平坦单轴跟踪系统均显著提高了土壤质量指数。这些发现表明,跟踪光伏系统创造了更均匀的土壤条件,并推动了土壤化学和生物特性的积极变化,从而比固定系统更有效地改善了沙漠土壤质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信