Nicola Arriga, Matteo Campioli, Mara Bernardi, Andrea Cerasa, Josep Peñuelas, Michele Brunetti, Claudia Cocozza, Alessandro Dell’Acqua, Ernest N. Koffi, Ignacio Goded, Giovanni Manca, Marco Matteucci, Michela Nocetti, Andrea Scartazza, Alessio Giovannelli
{"title":"Mediterranean pine forests: Comparison of fluxes and tree rings of Pinus pinaster Aiton and Pinus pinea L","authors":"Nicola Arriga, Matteo Campioli, Mara Bernardi, Andrea Cerasa, Josep Peñuelas, Michele Brunetti, Claudia Cocozza, Alessandro Dell’Acqua, Ernest N. Koffi, Ignacio Goded, Giovanni Manca, Marco Matteucci, Michela Nocetti, Andrea Scartazza, Alessio Giovannelli","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flux-monitoring networks nowadays integrate several stations, with more than 20 years of records. However, many questions are still open, and this work focused on the following two: (i) what is known about carbon and energy exchanges and efficiencies of evergreen conifer forests in the hot and dry Mediterranean climate zone, and (ii) what can be learned by combining information derived from flux and tree ring measurements in this context? These issues are addressed in this study using micrometeorological and dendrochronological measurements from a Mediterranean pine forest, San Rossore, in central Italy. The forest’s flux time series exceeds 20 years, merging two consecutive (not overlapping) time series of flux measurements above two evergreen conifer species: <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Aiton, 1789 (maritime pine) and <em>Pinus pinea</em> L., 1753 (stone pine). Despite both conifer species having shown high rates of photosynthesis, substantial differences have been found between them in terms of annual productivity, hydrological balance and efficiencies of carbon and water use. The more drought-tolerant <em>Pinus pinea</em> L. has been less productive than the drought-avoiding <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Aiton: interannual net ecosystem productivity averages and standard errors have been estimated to be 441 ± 46 gC m<sup>–2</sup> y<sup>–1</sup> and 224 ± 35 gC m<sup>–2</sup> y<sup>–1</sup> for <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Aiton and <em>Pinus pinea</em> L., respectively, and the latter has been found to consume more water as a consequence of the sustained transpiration process during prolonged summer droughts. Annual carbon accumulation, based on eddy covariance flux measurements, and annual wood increments, based on tree ring widths, for the two species are in overall alignment in terms of absolute values; however, a weak correlation suggests the need for more detailed analyses to gain more information about the carbon dynamics of the ecosystem, because the two approaches do not quantify exactly the same processes.","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110761","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Flux-monitoring networks nowadays integrate several stations, with more than 20 years of records. However, many questions are still open, and this work focused on the following two: (i) what is known about carbon and energy exchanges and efficiencies of evergreen conifer forests in the hot and dry Mediterranean climate zone, and (ii) what can be learned by combining information derived from flux and tree ring measurements in this context? These issues are addressed in this study using micrometeorological and dendrochronological measurements from a Mediterranean pine forest, San Rossore, in central Italy. The forest’s flux time series exceeds 20 years, merging two consecutive (not overlapping) time series of flux measurements above two evergreen conifer species: Pinus pinaster Aiton, 1789 (maritime pine) and Pinus pinea L., 1753 (stone pine). Despite both conifer species having shown high rates of photosynthesis, substantial differences have been found between them in terms of annual productivity, hydrological balance and efficiencies of carbon and water use. The more drought-tolerant Pinus pinea L. has been less productive than the drought-avoiding Pinus pinaster Aiton: interannual net ecosystem productivity averages and standard errors have been estimated to be 441 ± 46 gC m–2 y–1 and 224 ± 35 gC m–2 y–1 for Pinus pinaster Aiton and Pinus pinea L., respectively, and the latter has been found to consume more water as a consequence of the sustained transpiration process during prolonged summer droughts. Annual carbon accumulation, based on eddy covariance flux measurements, and annual wood increments, based on tree ring widths, for the two species are in overall alignment in terms of absolute values; however, a weak correlation suggests the need for more detailed analyses to gain more information about the carbon dynamics of the ecosystem, because the two approaches do not quantify exactly the same processes.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published.
Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.