Pulmonary Sarcoidosis Clinical Trial Endpoints: A Delphi Study.

IF 21 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Robert P Baughman,Jan C Grutters,Elyse E Lower,Ying Zhou,Marlies Wijsenbeek,Athol U Wells,Marcel Veltkamp,Dominique Valeyre,Paolo Spagnolo,Michelle Sharp,Jacobo Sellares,Ogugua N Obi,Hilario Nunes,Marc A Judson,Daniel A Culver,Francesco Bonella,Arata Azuma,Ingrid H E Korenromp
{"title":"Pulmonary Sarcoidosis Clinical Trial Endpoints: A Delphi Study.","authors":"Robert P Baughman,Jan C Grutters,Elyse E Lower,Ying Zhou,Marlies Wijsenbeek,Athol U Wells,Marcel Veltkamp,Dominique Valeyre,Paolo Spagnolo,Michelle Sharp,Jacobo Sellares,Ogugua N Obi,Hilario Nunes,Marc A Judson,Daniel A Culver,Francesco Bonella,Arata Azuma,Ingrid H E Korenromp","doi":"10.1183/13993003.00943-2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nCorticosteroids (CS), the most commonly prescribed treatment for sarcoidosis, are associated with significant toxicity, especially with long term usage. New intervention trials designed to reduce or eliminate CS require pertinent and precise clinical trial endpoints. However, consensus is lacking. The aim of the current study is to develop consensus for trial endpoints in pulmonary sarcoidosis.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA Delphi survey was developed by an Expert Panel of 30 sarcoidosis investigators. For Round 1, the panel created 97 statements regarding potential endpoints for a clinical trial of symptomatic pulmonary CS treated sarcoidosis patients. After anonymous voting in Round 2, the 97 statements were refined by all Stakeholders, including the Expert Panel and an additional 70 individuals interested in sarcoidosis therapies.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAfter Round 2, the Expert Panel achieved consensus for combination endpoints and 38 statements across six domains that supported the following endpoints: prednisone reduction by 50% or discontinuation, 10% predicted or greater improvement in FVC%, FEV1%, and DLCO% predicted, and improvement in the Kings Sarcoidosis Questionnaire (KSQ)-Lung and KSQ-General Health. Additionally, the majority of Stakeholders agreed to all statements which reached consensus by the Expert Panel.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nUtilizing the Delphi technique, international sarcoidosis experts successfully achieved consensus for 38 specific clinical trial endpoints which can be utilized in the development of novel steroid-sparing and eliminating therapies for pulmonary sarcoidosis.","PeriodicalId":12265,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Journal","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00943-2025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Corticosteroids (CS), the most commonly prescribed treatment for sarcoidosis, are associated with significant toxicity, especially with long term usage. New intervention trials designed to reduce or eliminate CS require pertinent and precise clinical trial endpoints. However, consensus is lacking. The aim of the current study is to develop consensus for trial endpoints in pulmonary sarcoidosis. METHODS A Delphi survey was developed by an Expert Panel of 30 sarcoidosis investigators. For Round 1, the panel created 97 statements regarding potential endpoints for a clinical trial of symptomatic pulmonary CS treated sarcoidosis patients. After anonymous voting in Round 2, the 97 statements were refined by all Stakeholders, including the Expert Panel and an additional 70 individuals interested in sarcoidosis therapies. RESULTS After Round 2, the Expert Panel achieved consensus for combination endpoints and 38 statements across six domains that supported the following endpoints: prednisone reduction by 50% or discontinuation, 10% predicted or greater improvement in FVC%, FEV1%, and DLCO% predicted, and improvement in the Kings Sarcoidosis Questionnaire (KSQ)-Lung and KSQ-General Health. Additionally, the majority of Stakeholders agreed to all statements which reached consensus by the Expert Panel. CONCLUSIONS Utilizing the Delphi technique, international sarcoidosis experts successfully achieved consensus for 38 specific clinical trial endpoints which can be utilized in the development of novel steroid-sparing and eliminating therapies for pulmonary sarcoidosis.
肺结节病临床试验终点:德尔菲研究。
背景:糖皮质激素(CS)是结节病最常用的处方治疗药物,具有显著的毒性,特别是长期使用。旨在减少或消除CS的新干预试验需要相关和精确的临床试验终点。然而,缺乏共识。当前研究的目的是就肺结节病的试验终点达成共识。方法由30名结节病调查员组成的专家小组进行德尔菲调查。对于第1轮,专家组创建了97项关于症状性肺CS治疗结节病患者临床试验的潜在终点的声明。在第二轮匿名投票后,所有利益相关者(包括专家小组和另外70名对结节病治疗感兴趣的个人)对97份声明进行了完善。结果:在第2轮之后,专家小组就联合用药终点达成共识,并在6个领域达成38项声明,支持以下终点:泼尼松减少50%或停药,预测FVC%、FEV1%和DLCO%预测改善10%或更大,以及改善Kings结节病问卷(KSQ)-肺和KSQ-一般健康。此外,大多数利益相关者同意专家小组达成共识的所有声明。结论利用德尔菲技术,国际结节病专家成功地就38个特定的临床试验终点达成共识,这些终点可用于开发新的肺结节病类固醇保留和消除疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Respiratory Journal
European Respiratory Journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
27.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Journal (ERJ) is the flagship journal of the European Respiratory Society. It has a current impact factor of 24.9. The journal covers various aspects of adult and paediatric respiratory medicine, including cell biology, epidemiology, immunology, oncology, pathophysiology, imaging, occupational medicine, intensive care, sleep medicine, and thoracic surgery. In addition to original research material, the ERJ publishes editorial commentaries, reviews, short research letters, and correspondence to the editor. The articles are published continuously and collected into 12 monthly issues in two volumes per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信