Anxiety and Arterial Stiffness in High-Risk Pregnancies: A Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Mekayla Forrest, Maria Matossian, Helena Papacostas Quintanilla, Isabelle Malhamé, Tina Montreuil, Stella S. Daskalopoulou
{"title":"Anxiety and Arterial Stiffness in High-Risk Pregnancies: A Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study","authors":"Mekayla Forrest,&nbsp;Maria Matossian,&nbsp;Helena Papacostas Quintanilla,&nbsp;Isabelle Malhamé,&nbsp;Tina Montreuil,&nbsp;Stella S. Daskalopoulou","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>In a high-risk pregnant population with singleton pregnancies, the primary objective was to evaluate the association between anxiety and arterial stiffness (AS) and the secondary objective was to investigate whether anxiety is associated with the incidence of preeclampsia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study (2012–2016).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Two tertiary care antenatal clinics in Montreal, Canada.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>High-risk pregnant individuals with pre-existing hypertension, diabetes, renal dysfunction, previous preeclampsia, or age ≥ 35 years were included. Exclusion criteria were excessive alcohol or drug use and cardiovascular disease. People with pregnancy loss, incomplete questionnaires and loss to follow-up were excluded from analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants were enrolled before 14-weeks' gestation, with follow-up assessments of AS every 4 weeks until delivery. Anxiety symptoms were assessed every trimester by the Beck Anxiety Inventory and by self-reported history of emotional disorders (anxiety/depression).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>AS and wave reflection parameters, primarily carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and preeclampsia diagnosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 235 individuals recruited, 161 were included in this secondary analysis. Baseline anxiety symptoms were present in 35.4% of participants. Anxiety was associated with a significant increase in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity across gestation, which persisted after adjustments for relevant confounders, in a combined mixed-effects model (<i>B</i> = 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.008–0.530, <i>p</i> = 0.04). A severity-response relationship was observed, where greater anxiety severity correlated with higher AS. Twelve participants (7.5%) developed preeclampsia. The association between anxiety and preeclampsia risk showed a non-significant trend (odds ratio [OR] = 2.77, 95% CI = 0.84–9.18). However, a history of emotional disorders significantly elevated preeclampsia risk (OR = 3.91, 95% CI = 1.14–13.40), independent of other risk factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Anxiety in high-risk pregnancies is associated with increased AS in a severity-response manner, and may be associated with preeclampsia risk. Integrating psychological health assessments with traditional obstetric evaluations could enhance the prediction and management of maternal complications.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 12","pages":"1833-1843"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.18325","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18325","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

In a high-risk pregnant population with singleton pregnancies, the primary objective was to evaluate the association between anxiety and arterial stiffness (AS) and the secondary objective was to investigate whether anxiety is associated with the incidence of preeclampsia.

Design

Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study (2012–2016).

Setting

Two tertiary care antenatal clinics in Montreal, Canada.

Participants

High-risk pregnant individuals with pre-existing hypertension, diabetes, renal dysfunction, previous preeclampsia, or age ≥ 35 years were included. Exclusion criteria were excessive alcohol or drug use and cardiovascular disease. People with pregnancy loss, incomplete questionnaires and loss to follow-up were excluded from analysis.

Methods

Participants were enrolled before 14-weeks' gestation, with follow-up assessments of AS every 4 weeks until delivery. Anxiety symptoms were assessed every trimester by the Beck Anxiety Inventory and by self-reported history of emotional disorders (anxiety/depression).

Main Outcome Measures

AS and wave reflection parameters, primarily carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and preeclampsia diagnosis.

Results

Of 235 individuals recruited, 161 were included in this secondary analysis. Baseline anxiety symptoms were present in 35.4% of participants. Anxiety was associated with a significant increase in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity across gestation, which persisted after adjustments for relevant confounders, in a combined mixed-effects model (B = 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.008–0.530, p = 0.04). A severity-response relationship was observed, where greater anxiety severity correlated with higher AS. Twelve participants (7.5%) developed preeclampsia. The association between anxiety and preeclampsia risk showed a non-significant trend (odds ratio [OR] = 2.77, 95% CI = 0.84–9.18). However, a history of emotional disorders significantly elevated preeclampsia risk (OR = 3.91, 95% CI = 1.14–13.40), independent of other risk factors.

Conclusions

Anxiety in high-risk pregnancies is associated with increased AS in a severity-response manner, and may be associated with preeclampsia risk. Integrating psychological health assessments with traditional obstetric evaluations could enhance the prediction and management of maternal complications.

Abstract Image

高危妊娠的焦虑和动脉僵硬:一项前瞻性队列研究的二次分析。
目的:在高危单胎妊娠人群中,主要目的是评估焦虑与动脉硬化(AS)之间的关系,次要目的是调查焦虑是否与先兆子痫的发生率相关。设计前瞻性队列研究(2012-2016)的二次分析。加拿大蒙特利尔的两个三级保健产前诊所。参与者:包括既往存在高血压、糖尿病、肾功能不全、既往有子痫前期或年龄≥35岁的高危孕妇。排除标准为过度酒精或药物使用和心血管疾病。妊娠失败、问卷不完整、随访失败者排除在分析之外。方法参与者在妊娠14周前入组,每4周随访一次,直至分娩。每三个月通过贝克焦虑量表和自我报告的情绪障碍史(焦虑/抑郁)评估焦虑症状。主要观察指标和波反射参数,主要是颈动脉-股动脉脉波速度和子痫前期诊断。结果在招募的235个人中,有161人被纳入了这次二次分析。35.4%的参与者存在基线焦虑症状。在综合混合效应模型中,焦虑与妊娠期间颈动脉-股动脉脉波速度的显著增加相关,在校正相关混杂因素后仍持续存在(B = 0.27, 95%可信区间[CI] = 0.008-0.530, p = 0.04)。严重程度-反应关系被观察到,更严重的焦虑程度与更高的AS相关。12名参与者(7.5%)出现先兆子痫。焦虑与子痫前期风险的相关性无显著趋势(优势比[OR] = 2.77, 95% CI = 0.84-9.18)。然而,情绪障碍史显著增加子痫前期风险(OR = 3.91, 95% CI = 1.14-13.40),独立于其他危险因素。结论高危妊娠焦虑与AS的增加呈严重反应性相关,并可能与子痫前期风险相关。将心理健康评估与传统的产科评估结合起来,可以加强对产妇并发症的预测和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信