Determinants of patient satisfaction in continuous positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: A multivariate analysis of knowledge, technical, and psychosocial factors.

IF 2
Marcel Braun, Sarah Dietz-Terjung, Torsten Eggert, Christoph Schoebel
{"title":"Determinants of patient satisfaction in continuous positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: A multivariate analysis of knowledge, technical, and psychosocial factors.","authors":"Marcel Braun, Sarah Dietz-Terjung, Torsten Eggert, Christoph Schoebel","doi":"10.1007/s11325-025-03438-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy is the primary treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but long-term adherence remains challenging. This study aimed to identify key predictors of patient satisfaction with PAP therapy by examining the interrelationships between disease knowledge, care provision, health beliefs, and patient-reported experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary sleep center in Germany. Adult patients with confirmed OSA diagnosis and experience with PAP therapy completed a comprehensive questionnaire assessing four domains: health attitudes and self-management, OSA care provision perceptions, OSA disease knowledge, and treatment experience. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of treatment satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 148 participants (72.8% male, mean age 57.9 ± 11.8 years), 58.8% were active PAP users. High levels of family support (> 90%) and disease knowledge were reported, with 94.4% acknowledging the importance of regular treatment. Treatment experience emerged as the primary predictor of satisfaction in domain-level analysis. The final regression model identified four significant predictors explaining 75.9% of variance in satisfaction: treatment effectiveness (β = 0.304, p <. 001), routine integration (β = 0.286, p =. 001), nocturnal awakening (β = 0.273, p <. 001), and mask removal (β = 0.198, p =. 007). Patient satisfaction negatively correlated with alternative treatment usage (τ=-0.274, p <. 001) and positively with disease duration (τ = 0.187, p =. 008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PAP therapy satisfaction is predominantly influenced by treatment-specific factors rather than general health attitudes or care provision perceptions. Understanding these predictors may help clinicians identify patients at risk for low satisfaction and target interventions accordingly.</p>","PeriodicalId":520777,"journal":{"name":"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung","volume":"29 4","pages":"265"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-025-03438-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy is the primary treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but long-term adherence remains challenging. This study aimed to identify key predictors of patient satisfaction with PAP therapy by examining the interrelationships between disease knowledge, care provision, health beliefs, and patient-reported experiences.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary sleep center in Germany. Adult patients with confirmed OSA diagnosis and experience with PAP therapy completed a comprehensive questionnaire assessing four domains: health attitudes and self-management, OSA care provision perceptions, OSA disease knowledge, and treatment experience. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of treatment satisfaction.

Results: Among 148 participants (72.8% male, mean age 57.9 ± 11.8 years), 58.8% were active PAP users. High levels of family support (> 90%) and disease knowledge were reported, with 94.4% acknowledging the importance of regular treatment. Treatment experience emerged as the primary predictor of satisfaction in domain-level analysis. The final regression model identified four significant predictors explaining 75.9% of variance in satisfaction: treatment effectiveness (β = 0.304, p <. 001), routine integration (β = 0.286, p =. 001), nocturnal awakening (β = 0.273, p <. 001), and mask removal (β = 0.198, p =. 007). Patient satisfaction negatively correlated with alternative treatment usage (τ=-0.274, p <. 001) and positively with disease duration (τ = 0.187, p =. 008).

Conclusion: PAP therapy satisfaction is predominantly influenced by treatment-specific factors rather than general health attitudes or care provision perceptions. Understanding these predictors may help clinicians identify patients at risk for low satisfaction and target interventions accordingly.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者持续气道正压治疗满意度的决定因素:知识、技术和社会心理因素的多变量分析。
背景:气道正压(PAP)治疗是阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的主要治疗方法,但长期坚持仍然具有挑战性。本研究旨在通过检查疾病知识、护理提供、健康信念和患者报告经历之间的相互关系,确定患者对PAP治疗满意度的关键预测因素。方法:在德国某三级睡眠中心进行横断面研究。确诊为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停并接受PAP治疗的成年患者完成了一份全面的问卷调查,评估四个领域:健康态度和自我管理、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停护理提供的认知、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停疾病知识和治疗经验。采用多元回归分析确定治疗满意度的预测因子。结果:148名参与者中(72.8%为男性,平均年龄57.9±11.8岁),58.8%为活跃PAP使用者。据报道,家庭支持(bbb90 %)和疾病知识水平较高,94.4%的人承认定期治疗的重要性。在领域水平分析中,治疗经验成为满意度的主要预测因子。最终的回归模型确定了四个显著的预测因子,解释了75.9%的满意度方差:治疗效果(β = 0.304, p)。结论:PAP治疗满意度主要受治疗特定因素的影响,而不是一般的健康态度或护理提供的看法。了解这些预测因素可以帮助临床医生识别有低满意度风险的患者,并相应地进行目标干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信