Mindfulness strategies for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eduardo Aliende Perin, Nelson Carvas Junior, Vinicius Tassoni Civile, Rosana Moreira Zenezi, Tamara Melnik
{"title":"Mindfulness strategies for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Eduardo Aliende Perin, Nelson Carvas Junior, Vinicius Tassoni Civile, Rosana Moreira Zenezi, Tamara Melnik","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2025-4214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mindfulness has been explored in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) treatment, but its efficacy remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) for adults with OCD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Two independent reviewers selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MBIs with active control interventions, including cognitive/behavioral techniques and psychoeducation. Primary outcomes were obsessive-compulsive symptoms, dropout rates, anxiety, depressive symptoms, mindfulness skills, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs (n = 499; mean age = 32.8 years; mean disorder duration = 9.83 years) were included. Interventions lasted from 2 to 48 weeks. The certainty of evidence ranged from low to high. Mindfulness did not significantly differ from other strategies for reducing obsessive-compulsive symptoms (SMD = -0.08; 95% CI: -0.35 to 0.18), dropout rates (RR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.69 to 1.43), anxiety (SMD = -0.28; 95% CI: -0.57 to 0.00), or depression (SMD = -0.07; 95% CI: -0.26 to 0.11). A small improvement in mindfulness skills was observed (SMD = 0.24; 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.48), though not clinically relevant. Quality of life findings were inconsistent and could not be pooled in analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mindfulness-based interventions were not significantly different from the group \"other interventions\", which included well-established OCD treatments such as exposure with response prevention (ERP), psychoeducation, and cognitive restructuring.</p>","PeriodicalId":520767,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/1516-4446-2025-4214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mindfulness has been explored in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) treatment, but its efficacy remains unclear.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) for adults with OCD.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Two independent reviewers selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MBIs with active control interventions, including cognitive/behavioral techniques and psychoeducation. Primary outcomes were obsessive-compulsive symptoms, dropout rates, anxiety, depressive symptoms, mindfulness skills, and quality of life.

Results: Six RCTs (n = 499; mean age = 32.8 years; mean disorder duration = 9.83 years) were included. Interventions lasted from 2 to 48 weeks. The certainty of evidence ranged from low to high. Mindfulness did not significantly differ from other strategies for reducing obsessive-compulsive symptoms (SMD = -0.08; 95% CI: -0.35 to 0.18), dropout rates (RR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.69 to 1.43), anxiety (SMD = -0.28; 95% CI: -0.57 to 0.00), or depression (SMD = -0.07; 95% CI: -0.26 to 0.11). A small improvement in mindfulness skills was observed (SMD = 0.24; 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.48), though not clinically relevant. Quality of life findings were inconsistent and could not be pooled in analysis.

Conclusions: Mindfulness-based interventions were not significantly different from the group "other interventions", which included well-established OCD treatments such as exposure with response prevention (ERP), psychoeducation, and cognitive restructuring.

强迫症的正念策略:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:正念在强迫症(OCD)的治疗中得到了探索,但其疗效尚不清楚。目的:评价正念干预(MBIs)治疗成人强迫症的效果。方法:根据Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册进行系统评价和荟萃分析。两名独立审稿人选择了随机对照试验(rct),比较mbi与主动控制干预,包括认知/行为技术和心理教育。主要结局是强迫症症状、辍学率、焦虑、抑郁症状、正念技能和生活质量。结果:6项随机对照试验(n = 499;平均年龄32.8岁;平均疾病持续时间= 9.83年)。干预时间为2 ~ 48周。证据的确定性从低到高不等。正念与其他减轻强迫症状的策略没有显著差异(SMD = -0.08;95% CI: -0.35 ~ 0.18),辍学率(RR = 1.00;95% CI: 0.69 ~ 1.43),焦虑(SMD = -0.28;95% CI: -0.57 ~ 0.00)或抑郁(SMD = -0.07;95% CI: -0.26 ~ 0.11)。观察到正念技能有小幅改善(SMD = 0.24;95% CI: 0.01 ~ 0.48),但与临床无关。生活质量的研究结果不一致,不能在分析中汇总。结论:基于正念的干预与“其他干预”组无显著差异,“其他干预”包括成熟的强迫症治疗,如暴露与反应预防(ERP)、心理教育和认知重组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信