Evaluation of the Effectiveness, Safety, and Patient Satisfaction of Artificial Intelligence-Based Patient Education and Counseling for Both Recipients and Donors in the Preoperative and Postoperative Phases of Organ Transplantation.

IF 0.8
Veysel Umman, Busra Tosun, Abdulkerim Uygur, Sukru Emre
{"title":"Evaluation of the Effectiveness, Safety, and Patient Satisfaction of Artificial Intelligence-Based Patient Education and Counseling for Both Recipients and Donors in the Preoperative and Postoperative Phases of Organ Transplantation.","authors":"Veysel Umman, Busra Tosun, Abdulkerim Uygur, Sukru Emre","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Effective patient education is critical in organ transplantation, particularly for living donor groups, where informed decision-making impacts both donors and recipients. AI-driven solutions, such as OpenAI's ChatGPT, can enhance education by providing real-time responses. This study assessed the effectiveness, safety, and satisfaction of an AI-supported patient education system integrated with WhatsApp and a Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted at our transplant center between October 1, 2023, and July 31, 2024. Eligible participants included adults (18-65 years) who were either recipients or living donor candidates for kidney and liver transplantation. AI-generated responses were retrospectively evaluated by transplant physicians for accuracy and safety using a 5-point Likert scale. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the validated Turkish Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS) form.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 196 patients submitted 1281 questions, categorized into nine thematic groups. The most common inquiries pertained to post-transplant social life and work resumption (25.2%). AI responses demonstrated high safety (92% scoring ≥4) and accuracy (80% scoring ≥4). The highest accuracy was for surgical technique-related questions (4.7/5), while general questions had the lowest (4.2/5). Patient satisfaction was overwhelmingly positive, with 99.5% expressing satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AI-supported system provided accurate and safe preoperative and postoperative education for transplant patients, demonstrating high satisfaction. AI integration into clinical workflows presents a promising advancement, though challenges related to accuracy and ethics remain. Future research should explore AI's role in image recognition and triage to optimize transplant patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94258,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.07.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Effective patient education is critical in organ transplantation, particularly for living donor groups, where informed decision-making impacts both donors and recipients. AI-driven solutions, such as OpenAI's ChatGPT, can enhance education by providing real-time responses. This study assessed the effectiveness, safety, and satisfaction of an AI-supported patient education system integrated with WhatsApp and a Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at our transplant center between October 1, 2023, and July 31, 2024. Eligible participants included adults (18-65 years) who were either recipients or living donor candidates for kidney and liver transplantation. AI-generated responses were retrospectively evaluated by transplant physicians for accuracy and safety using a 5-point Likert scale. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the validated Turkish Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS) form.

Results: A total of 196 patients submitted 1281 questions, categorized into nine thematic groups. The most common inquiries pertained to post-transplant social life and work resumption (25.2%). AI responses demonstrated high safety (92% scoring ≥4) and accuracy (80% scoring ≥4). The highest accuracy was for surgical technique-related questions (4.7/5), while general questions had the lowest (4.2/5). Patient satisfaction was overwhelmingly positive, with 99.5% expressing satisfaction.

Conclusion: The AI-supported system provided accurate and safe preoperative and postoperative education for transplant patients, demonstrating high satisfaction. AI integration into clinical workflows presents a promising advancement, though challenges related to accuracy and ethics remain. Future research should explore AI's role in image recognition and triage to optimize transplant patient care.

基于人工智能的器官移植术前和术后患者教育和咨询的有效性、安全性和患者满意度评估
有效的患者教育在器官移植中是至关重要的,特别是对于活体供体群体,其中知情的决策影响供体和受体。人工智能驱动的解决方案,如OpenAI的ChatGPT,可以通过提供实时响应来增强教育。本研究评估了与WhatsApp和客户关系管理(CRM)系统集成的人工智能支持的患者教育系统的有效性、安全性和满意度。方法:一项前瞻性观察研究于2023年10月1日至2024年7月31日在我院移植中心进行。符合条件的参与者包括成年人(18-65岁),他们要么是肾和肝移植的接受者,要么是活体供体候选人。移植医生使用5分制李克特量表回顾性评估人工智能生成的反应的准确性和安全性。使用经过验证的土耳其患者满意度短期评估(SAPS)表格评估患者满意度。结果:共196例患者提交了1281个问题,分为9个主题组。最常见的询问与移植后的社交生活和恢复工作有关(25.2%)。人工智能反应具有较高的安全性(92%得分≥4)和准确性(80%得分≥4)。准确度最高的是手术技术相关问题(4.7/5),而一般问题的准确度最低(4.2/5)。患者满意度非常高,99.5%的患者表示满意。结论:人工智能支持系统为移植患者提供了准确、安全的术前、术后教育,患者满意度高。人工智能与临床工作流程的整合是一个有希望的进步,尽管与准确性和伦理相关的挑战仍然存在。未来的研究应该探索人工智能在图像识别和分诊中的作用,以优化移植患者的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信