Evaluation of the Effectiveness, Safety, and Patient Satisfaction of Artificial Intelligence-Based Patient Education and Counseling for Both Recipients and Donors in the Preoperative and Postoperative Phases of Organ Transplantation.
{"title":"Evaluation of the Effectiveness, Safety, and Patient Satisfaction of Artificial Intelligence-Based Patient Education and Counseling for Both Recipients and Donors in the Preoperative and Postoperative Phases of Organ Transplantation.","authors":"Veysel Umman, Busra Tosun, Abdulkerim Uygur, Sukru Emre","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Effective patient education is critical in organ transplantation, particularly for living donor groups, where informed decision-making impacts both donors and recipients. AI-driven solutions, such as OpenAI's ChatGPT, can enhance education by providing real-time responses. This study assessed the effectiveness, safety, and satisfaction of an AI-supported patient education system integrated with WhatsApp and a Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted at our transplant center between October 1, 2023, and July 31, 2024. Eligible participants included adults (18-65 years) who were either recipients or living donor candidates for kidney and liver transplantation. AI-generated responses were retrospectively evaluated by transplant physicians for accuracy and safety using a 5-point Likert scale. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the validated Turkish Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS) form.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 196 patients submitted 1281 questions, categorized into nine thematic groups. The most common inquiries pertained to post-transplant social life and work resumption (25.2%). AI responses demonstrated high safety (92% scoring ≥4) and accuracy (80% scoring ≥4). The highest accuracy was for surgical technique-related questions (4.7/5), while general questions had the lowest (4.2/5). Patient satisfaction was overwhelmingly positive, with 99.5% expressing satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AI-supported system provided accurate and safe preoperative and postoperative education for transplant patients, demonstrating high satisfaction. AI integration into clinical workflows presents a promising advancement, though challenges related to accuracy and ethics remain. Future research should explore AI's role in image recognition and triage to optimize transplant patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94258,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.07.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Effective patient education is critical in organ transplantation, particularly for living donor groups, where informed decision-making impacts both donors and recipients. AI-driven solutions, such as OpenAI's ChatGPT, can enhance education by providing real-time responses. This study assessed the effectiveness, safety, and satisfaction of an AI-supported patient education system integrated with WhatsApp and a Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system.
Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at our transplant center between October 1, 2023, and July 31, 2024. Eligible participants included adults (18-65 years) who were either recipients or living donor candidates for kidney and liver transplantation. AI-generated responses were retrospectively evaluated by transplant physicians for accuracy and safety using a 5-point Likert scale. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the validated Turkish Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS) form.
Results: A total of 196 patients submitted 1281 questions, categorized into nine thematic groups. The most common inquiries pertained to post-transplant social life and work resumption (25.2%). AI responses demonstrated high safety (92% scoring ≥4) and accuracy (80% scoring ≥4). The highest accuracy was for surgical technique-related questions (4.7/5), while general questions had the lowest (4.2/5). Patient satisfaction was overwhelmingly positive, with 99.5% expressing satisfaction.
Conclusion: The AI-supported system provided accurate and safe preoperative and postoperative education for transplant patients, demonstrating high satisfaction. AI integration into clinical workflows presents a promising advancement, though challenges related to accuracy and ethics remain. Future research should explore AI's role in image recognition and triage to optimize transplant patient care.