PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced, unresectable esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of their effects across patient subgroups.

IF 5.6
Mohammed S Beshr, Rana H Shembesh, Abdelaziz H Salama, Imane Chenfouh, Sarah M Alfaqaih, Abdallah Khashan, Arwi Omar Kara, Maram Abuajamieh, Eman Basheer, Zahraa Alla Ansaf, Esraa Arhaym, Mohamedhen Vall Nounou, Mohamed E Ali, Elizabeth C Smyth, Muhammed Elhadi, Markus Moehler
{"title":"PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced, unresectable esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of their effects across patient subgroups.","authors":"Mohammed S Beshr, Rana H Shembesh, Abdelaziz H Salama, Imane Chenfouh, Sarah M Alfaqaih, Abdallah Khashan, Arwi Omar Kara, Maram Abuajamieh, Eman Basheer, Zahraa Alla Ansaf, Esraa Arhaym, Mohamedhen Vall Nounou, Mohamed E Ali, Elizabeth C Smyth, Muhammed Elhadi, Markus Moehler","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advanced esophageal cell carcinoma (ESCC) is associated with poor survival outcomes. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of advanced ESCC. We aim to study PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors across other variables in advanced ESCC, including data presented at the September 2024 FDA Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) meeting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On February 28, 2025, we conducted a comprehensive search using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library to identify randomized clinical trials evaluating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced ESCC. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Subgroup analyses were performed based on the following variables: age, gender, smoking status, ECOG performance status, liver metastasis, disease stage (locally advanced vs. metastatic), combined positive score (CPS; particularly with cutoff values of CPS 5 and CPS 1-9), and tumor area positivity (TAP). Effect sizes were estimated using the hazard ratio (HR) with random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 5514 articles screened, only 13 papers were included, involving 6672 patients. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly improved OS in both first- and second-line. In the first-line setting (combined with chemotherapy), they reduced the risk of death by 32 % (HR: 0.68; 95 % CI: 0.63-0.74, p < 0.001), while in the second-line setting (used as monotherapy), they reduced mortality by 27 % (HR: 0.73; 95 % CI: 0.66-0.81, p < 0.001). For PFS, a significant benefit was seen only in first-line treatment (HR: 0.62; 95 % CI: 0.58-0.67, p < 0.001) but not in second-line (HR: 0.89; 95 % CI: 0.76-1.04, p = 0.128), with a significant difference between treatment lines (p < 0.001). Most subgroups in our study demonstrated significant survival benefits, except for current smokers (HR: 0.58; 95 % CI: 0.31-1.09; p = 0.089). Finally, all CPS subgroups showed survival benefits in the first-line setting except those with CPS < 1 (PD-L1 negative). A similar pattern was observed in the second-line setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly improve OS over chemotherapy in both first- and second-line advanced ESCC. PFS improved only in the first line. More effective therapies for the second line are still needed. Current smokers showed no survival benefit, unlike former or never smokers. OS benefit was absent in PD-L1-negative patients (CPS <1) and greatest in those with CPS ≥ 10.</p>","PeriodicalId":93958,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":" ","pages":"104876"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advanced esophageal cell carcinoma (ESCC) is associated with poor survival outcomes. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of advanced ESCC. We aim to study PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors across other variables in advanced ESCC, including data presented at the September 2024 FDA Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) meeting.

Methods: On February 28, 2025, we conducted a comprehensive search using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library to identify randomized clinical trials evaluating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced ESCC. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Subgroup analyses were performed based on the following variables: age, gender, smoking status, ECOG performance status, liver metastasis, disease stage (locally advanced vs. metastatic), combined positive score (CPS; particularly with cutoff values of CPS 5 and CPS 1-9), and tumor area positivity (TAP). Effect sizes were estimated using the hazard ratio (HR) with random effects model.

Results: Out of 5514 articles screened, only 13 papers were included, involving 6672 patients. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly improved OS in both first- and second-line. In the first-line setting (combined with chemotherapy), they reduced the risk of death by 32 % (HR: 0.68; 95 % CI: 0.63-0.74, p < 0.001), while in the second-line setting (used as monotherapy), they reduced mortality by 27 % (HR: 0.73; 95 % CI: 0.66-0.81, p < 0.001). For PFS, a significant benefit was seen only in first-line treatment (HR: 0.62; 95 % CI: 0.58-0.67, p < 0.001) but not in second-line (HR: 0.89; 95 % CI: 0.76-1.04, p = 0.128), with a significant difference between treatment lines (p < 0.001). Most subgroups in our study demonstrated significant survival benefits, except for current smokers (HR: 0.58; 95 % CI: 0.31-1.09; p = 0.089). Finally, all CPS subgroups showed survival benefits in the first-line setting except those with CPS < 1 (PD-L1 negative). A similar pattern was observed in the second-line setting.

Conclusions: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly improve OS over chemotherapy in both first- and second-line advanced ESCC. PFS improved only in the first line. More effective therapies for the second line are still needed. Current smokers showed no survival benefit, unlike former or never smokers. OS benefit was absent in PD-L1-negative patients (CPS <1) and greatest in those with CPS ≥ 10.

PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂在晚期不可切除的食管鳞状细胞癌中的作用:一项对其在患者亚组中的作用的meta分析
背景:晚期食管癌(ESCC)与较差的生存预后相关。PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂已被批准用于晚期ESCC的治疗。我们的目标是研究PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂在晚期ESCC中的其他变量,包括在2024年9月FDA肿瘤药物咨询委员会(ODAC)会议上提交的数据。方法:2025年2月28日,我们对PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus和Cochrane Library进行了全面检索,以确定评估PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂在晚期ESCC中的随机临床试验。主要终点是总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。根据以下变量进行亚组分析:年龄、性别、吸烟状况、ECOG表现状况、肝转移、疾病分期(局部晚期vs转移性)、联合阳性评分(CPS;特别是CPS 5和CPS 1-9的截止值)和肿瘤区域阳性(TAP)。采用随机效应模型的风险比(HR)估计效应量。结果:在5514篇被筛选的文章中,只有13篇被纳入,涉及6672名患者。PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂可显著改善一线和二线患者的OS。在一线环境中(联合化疗),他们将死亡风险降低了32% (HR: 0.68;95% CI: 0.63-0.74, p < 0.001),而在二线环境中(用作单药治疗),它们将死亡率降低了27% (HR: 0.73;95% CI: 0.66-0.81, p < 0.001)。对于PFS,只有在一线治疗中才有显著的获益(HR: 0.62;结论:PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂与化疗相比,可显著改善一线和二线晚期ESCC的OS。PFS仅在一线有所改善。目前仍需要更有效的二线治疗方法。与以前的吸烟者或从不吸烟者不同,目前的吸烟者没有表现出生存优势。pd - l1阴性患者(CPS)没有OS获益
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信