Balloon Enteroscopy-Assisted ERCP Versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage for Unresectable Malignant Biliary Obstruction in Patients With Surgically Altered Anatomy: A Multicenter Prospective Registration Study.

IF 4.7
Masahiro Itonaga, Mamoru Takenaka, Kenji Ikezawa, Tsukasa Ikeura, Masaaki Shimatani, Masanori Asada, Nao Fujimori, Ryota Sagami, Takeshi Ogura, Hajime Imai, Kazuyuki Matsumoto, Shuhei Shintani, Hideyuki Shiomi, Keiichi Hatamaru, Kosuke Minaga, Ryoji Takada, Ke Wan, Toshio Shimokawa, Masayuki Kitano
{"title":"Balloon Enteroscopy-Assisted ERCP Versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage for Unresectable Malignant Biliary Obstruction in Patients With Surgically Altered Anatomy: A Multicenter Prospective Registration Study.","authors":"Masahiro Itonaga, Mamoru Takenaka, Kenji Ikezawa, Tsukasa Ikeura, Masaaki Shimatani, Masanori Asada, Nao Fujimori, Ryota Sagami, Takeshi Ogura, Hajime Imai, Kazuyuki Matsumoto, Shuhei Shintani, Hideyuki Shiomi, Keiichi Hatamaru, Kosuke Minaga, Ryoji Takada, Ke Wan, Toshio Shimokawa, Masayuki Kitano","doi":"10.1111/den.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The present prospective multicenter clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (BEA-ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) as primary drainage methods for patients with surgically altered anatomy (SAA) and unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Technical and clinical success rates, procedure time, adverse events (AEs), and time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO) were compared. Risk factors associated with technical failure were evaluated, and subgroup analysis investigating whether Roux-en-Y reconstruction affected the technical success rate was also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient characteristics were comparable between the BEA-ERCP (n = 54) and EUS-BD (n = 44) groups. Compared with the BEA-ERCP group, the EUS-BD group had a significantly higher technical success rate, a significantly shorter procedure time, comparable rates of clinical success and AEs, and comparable TRBO. Multivariate analysis showed that BEA-ERCP was an independent predictor of technical failure. Subgroup analysis revealed that the technical success rate was significantly higher with EUS-BD than with BEA-ERCP in patients with Roux-en-Y reconstruction, with no significant difference in those without Roux-en-Y reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EUS-BD may be a more suitable primary drainage method than BEA-ERCP for patients with SAA and unresectable MBO, especially those with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (University Hospital Medical Information Network 000049224).</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>UMIN000049224.</p>","PeriodicalId":72813,"journal":{"name":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/den.70010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: The present prospective multicenter clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (BEA-ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) as primary drainage methods for patients with surgically altered anatomy (SAA) and unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO).

Methods: Technical and clinical success rates, procedure time, adverse events (AEs), and time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO) were compared. Risk factors associated with technical failure were evaluated, and subgroup analysis investigating whether Roux-en-Y reconstruction affected the technical success rate was also performed.

Results: Patient characteristics were comparable between the BEA-ERCP (n = 54) and EUS-BD (n = 44) groups. Compared with the BEA-ERCP group, the EUS-BD group had a significantly higher technical success rate, a significantly shorter procedure time, comparable rates of clinical success and AEs, and comparable TRBO. Multivariate analysis showed that BEA-ERCP was an independent predictor of technical failure. Subgroup analysis revealed that the technical success rate was significantly higher with EUS-BD than with BEA-ERCP in patients with Roux-en-Y reconstruction, with no significant difference in those without Roux-en-Y reconstruction.

Conclusions: EUS-BD may be a more suitable primary drainage method than BEA-ERCP for patients with SAA and unresectable MBO, especially those with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (University Hospital Medical Information Network 000049224).

Trial registration: UMIN000049224.

气囊肠镜辅助ERCP与超声内镜引导下胆道引流治疗手术改变患者不可切除的恶性胆道梗阻:一项多中心前瞻性登记研究。
背景与目的:本前瞻性多中心临床试验比较了球囊内镜辅助内镜逆行胆管造影术(BEA-ERCP)和内镜超声引导胆道引流术(EUS-BD)作为手术解剖改变(SAA)和不可切除的恶性胆道梗阻(MBO)患者的主要引流方法的有效性和安全性。方法:比较技术和临床成功率、手术时间、不良事件(ae)和复发性胆道梗阻(TRBO)时间。评估与技术失败相关的风险因素,并进行亚组分析,调查Roux-en-Y重建是否影响技术成功率。结果:BEA-ERCP组(n = 54)和EUS-BD组(n = 44)的患者特征具有可比性。与BEA-ERCP组相比,EUS-BD组的技术成功率明显更高,手术时间明显缩短,临床成功率和ae率相当,TRBO也相当。多因素分析表明,BEA-ERCP是技术故障的独立预测因子。亚组分析显示,Roux-en-Y重建患者的EUS-BD技术成功率明显高于BEA-ERCP,而未Roux-en-Y重建患者的技术成功率无显著差异。结论:对于SAA合并不可切除的MBO患者,尤其是Roux-en-Y重建患者,EUS-BD可能是比BEA-ERCP更适合的一级引流方法(大学医院医疗信息网000049224)。试验注册号:UMIN000049224。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信