Patients' Perception of a Brief Web- and Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Pain Following Discharge After Total Joint Arthroplasty: Qualitative Description.

IF 4
JMIR nursing Pub Date : 2025-08-06 DOI:10.2196/69010
Geraldine Martorella, Adam Wesley Hanley, Kathryn Elizabeth Muessig
{"title":"Patients' Perception of a Brief Web- and Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Pain Following Discharge After Total Joint Arthroplasty: Qualitative Description.","authors":"Geraldine Martorella, Adam Wesley Hanley, Kathryn Elizabeth Muessig","doi":"10.2196/69010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Important levels of pain are reported upon discharge from major surgery, with a risk of becoming chronic. Further, individuals express the need for support in managing pain after discharge. However, very few studies address pain management interventions in the postdischarge phase after surgery, including for individuals undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA). We have conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial testing a brief mindfulness intervention targeting people at risk for chronic postsurgical pain 2 weeks after surgery. Although the intervention we proposed was judged acceptable based on ratings obtained through a questionnaire, the nuanced perceptions of why and how it is considered acceptable are critical in refining the intervention. Moreover, the acceptability of mindfulness interventions in the perioperative context remains generally unknown and even more so in the postdischarge setting.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to use qualitative data to explore the individual perception of acceptability of a brief 4-week, Web- and mindfulness-based intervention for pain following discharge after a TJA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative description was used to assess patients' perception of the preliminary version of the intervention for pain management following discharge after surgery. The qualitative assessment was done at the end of the 4-week intervention (6 weeks after surgery). Semistructured interviews with open-ended questions were used to encourage free expression from participants (n=16) before proceeding to content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When reflecting on the benefits of the intervention, the main themes that emerged were mindfulness, pain acceptance, and supplementary relief. Overall, the intervention was perceived as relevant and suitable during recovery, although participants experienced a few challenges related to the novelty of mindfulness practice. Engagement and readiness were discussed in relation to adherence to the intervention. Addressing expectations and personal beliefs before the intervention could improve participants' adherence. Offering additional support when spikes of pain occur could help overcome some challenges related to mindfulness practice during postoperative recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the increasing number of TJA surgeries performed annually and the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions, such as mindfulness-based approaches, in supporting recovery and well-being, efforts should be made to increase patient access to these promising adjunctive treatments. Combining nonpharmacological interventions before and after surgery may be an interesting avenue to optimize pain relief and recovery, as well as prevent complications. Finally, the use of technology could improve the accessibility, scalability, and adoption of these promising approaches for individuals with limited resources and mobility.</p>","PeriodicalId":73556,"journal":{"name":"JMIR nursing","volume":"8 ","pages":"e69010"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12327906/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/69010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Important levels of pain are reported upon discharge from major surgery, with a risk of becoming chronic. Further, individuals express the need for support in managing pain after discharge. However, very few studies address pain management interventions in the postdischarge phase after surgery, including for individuals undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA). We have conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial testing a brief mindfulness intervention targeting people at risk for chronic postsurgical pain 2 weeks after surgery. Although the intervention we proposed was judged acceptable based on ratings obtained through a questionnaire, the nuanced perceptions of why and how it is considered acceptable are critical in refining the intervention. Moreover, the acceptability of mindfulness interventions in the perioperative context remains generally unknown and even more so in the postdischarge setting.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to use qualitative data to explore the individual perception of acceptability of a brief 4-week, Web- and mindfulness-based intervention for pain following discharge after a TJA.

Methods: A qualitative description was used to assess patients' perception of the preliminary version of the intervention for pain management following discharge after surgery. The qualitative assessment was done at the end of the 4-week intervention (6 weeks after surgery). Semistructured interviews with open-ended questions were used to encourage free expression from participants (n=16) before proceeding to content analysis.

Results: When reflecting on the benefits of the intervention, the main themes that emerged were mindfulness, pain acceptance, and supplementary relief. Overall, the intervention was perceived as relevant and suitable during recovery, although participants experienced a few challenges related to the novelty of mindfulness practice. Engagement and readiness were discussed in relation to adherence to the intervention. Addressing expectations and personal beliefs before the intervention could improve participants' adherence. Offering additional support when spikes of pain occur could help overcome some challenges related to mindfulness practice during postoperative recovery.

Conclusions: Given the increasing number of TJA surgeries performed annually and the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions, such as mindfulness-based approaches, in supporting recovery and well-being, efforts should be made to increase patient access to these promising adjunctive treatments. Combining nonpharmacological interventions before and after surgery may be an interesting avenue to optimize pain relief and recovery, as well as prevent complications. Finally, the use of technology could improve the accessibility, scalability, and adoption of these promising approaches for individuals with limited resources and mobility.

患者对全关节置换术后出院后疼痛的简短网络和正念干预的感知:定性描述。
背景:在大手术出院时,有重要程度的疼痛报告,并有成为慢性的风险。此外,个人表示需要在出院后管理疼痛的支持。然而,很少有研究涉及手术后出院阶段的疼痛管理干预,包括接受全关节置换术(TJA)的个体。我们进行了一项随机对照试验,针对术后2周有慢性术后疼痛风险的人群进行了简短的正念干预。虽然我们提出的干预措施是根据调查问卷获得的评分来判断为可接受的,但对为什么以及如何被认为是可接受的细致入微的看法对于改进干预措施至关重要。此外,正念干预在围手术期的可接受性仍然是未知的,在出院后的环境中更是如此。目的:本研究的目的是使用定性数据来探讨个体对TJA术后出院后疼痛进行为期4周的网络和正念干预的可接受性。方法:采用定性描述来评估患者对术后出院后疼痛管理干预的初步版本的感知。在4周干预结束时(手术后6周)进行定性评估。在进行内容分析之前,采用带有开放式问题的半结构化访谈来鼓励参与者(n=16)自由表达。结果:当反思干预的好处时,出现的主要主题是正念,疼痛接受和补充缓解。总体而言,尽管参与者经历了一些与正念练习的新颖性相关的挑战,但在恢复过程中,干预被认为是相关的和合适的。讨论了参与和准备情况与遵守干预措施的关系。在干预之前解决期望和个人信念可以提高参与者的依从性。当疼痛尖峰发生时,提供额外的支持可以帮助克服术后恢复过程中与正念练习相关的一些挑战。结论:鉴于每年进行的TJA手术数量不断增加,以及非药物干预(如基于正念的方法)在支持恢复和健康方面的有效性,应努力增加患者获得这些有希望的辅助治疗的机会。手术前后结合非药物干预可能是优化疼痛缓解和恢复以及预防并发症的有趣途径。最后,技术的使用可以改善资源和移动性有限的个人对这些有前途的方法的可访问性、可伸缩性和采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信