Uncovering Phenotypes in Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review of Unsupervised Machine Learning Approaches.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Lilia Dimitrov, Liam Barrett, Aizaz Chaudhry, Jameel Muzaffar, Watjana Lilaonitkul, Nishchay Mehta
{"title":"Uncovering Phenotypes in Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review of Unsupervised Machine Learning Approaches.","authors":"Lilia Dimitrov, Liam Barrett, Aizaz Chaudhry, Jameel Muzaffar, Watjana Lilaonitkul, Nishchay Mehta","doi":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The majority of the 1.5 billion people living with hearing loss are affected by sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Reliably categorizing these individuals into distinct subtypes remains a significant challenge, which is a critical step for developing tailored treatment approaches. Unsupervised machine learning, a branch of artificial intelligence (AI), offers a promising solution to this issue. However, no study has yet compared the outcomes of different AI models in this context. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the existing literature on the application of unsupervised machine learning models to hearing health data for identifying subtypes of SNHL.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic search was performed of the following databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO (Ovid version), EMBASE, CINAHL, IEEE, and Scopus as well as a search of grey literature using GitHub and Base, and manual search (Jan 1990-Mar 2024). Studies were included only if they reported on adult patients with SNHL and used an unsupervised machine-learning approach. Quality assessment was performed using the APPRAISE-AI tool. The heterogeneity of studies necessitated a narrative synthesis of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies were included in the analysis. Apart from one case-control study, all were cohort studies. Four different algorithms were used, with no study comparing the performance of more than one algorithm. Across these studies, only 2 distinct numbers of subtypes were identified: 4 and 11. However, the overall quality of the studies was deemed low, thus preventing definitive conclusions regarding model selection and the actual number of subtypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review identifies key methodological practices that need to be improved before the potential of unsupervised machine learning models to subtype SNHL can be realized. Future research in this field should justify model selection, ensure reproducibility, use high-quality hearing data, and validate model findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":55172,"journal":{"name":"Ear and Hearing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12533775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear and Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001696","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The majority of the 1.5 billion people living with hearing loss are affected by sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Reliably categorizing these individuals into distinct subtypes remains a significant challenge, which is a critical step for developing tailored treatment approaches. Unsupervised machine learning, a branch of artificial intelligence (AI), offers a promising solution to this issue. However, no study has yet compared the outcomes of different AI models in this context. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the existing literature on the application of unsupervised machine learning models to hearing health data for identifying subtypes of SNHL.

Design: A systematic search was performed of the following databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO (Ovid version), EMBASE, CINAHL, IEEE, and Scopus as well as a search of grey literature using GitHub and Base, and manual search (Jan 1990-Mar 2024). Studies were included only if they reported on adult patients with SNHL and used an unsupervised machine-learning approach. Quality assessment was performed using the APPRAISE-AI tool. The heterogeneity of studies necessitated a narrative synthesis of the results.

Results: Seven studies were included in the analysis. Apart from one case-control study, all were cohort studies. Four different algorithms were used, with no study comparing the performance of more than one algorithm. Across these studies, only 2 distinct numbers of subtypes were identified: 4 and 11. However, the overall quality of the studies was deemed low, thus preventing definitive conclusions regarding model selection and the actual number of subtypes.

Conclusions: This systematic review identifies key methodological practices that need to be improved before the potential of unsupervised machine learning models to subtype SNHL can be realized. Future research in this field should justify model selection, ensure reproducibility, use high-quality hearing data, and validate model findings.

揭示感音神经性听力损失的表型:对无监督机器学习方法的系统回顾。
15亿听力损失患者中的大多数都受到感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)的影响。将这些个体可靠地分类为不同的亚型仍然是一个重大挑战,这是开发量身定制的治疗方法的关键一步。作为人工智能(AI)的一个分支,无监督机器学习为这个问题提供了一个有希望的解决方案。然而,目前还没有研究比较不同人工智能模型在这种情况下的结果。本综述的目的是综合现有的关于将无监督机器学习模型应用于听力健康数据以识别SNHL亚型的文献。设计:系统检索以下数据库:MEDLINE, PsycINFO (Ovid版本),EMBASE, CINAHL, IEEE和Scopus,并使用GitHub和Base检索灰色文献,手动检索(1990年1月- 2024年3月)。只有报道SNHL成年患者并使用无监督机器学习方法的研究才被纳入。使用evaluate - ai工具进行质量评估。由于研究的异质性,有必要对结果进行叙述综合。结果:7项研究被纳入分析。除一项病例对照研究外,其余均为队列研究。使用了四种不同的算法,没有研究比较多个算法的性能。在这些研究中,只确定了两种不同数量的亚型:4和11。然而,研究的整体质量被认为很低,因此无法就模型选择和实际亚型数量得出明确的结论。结论:本系统综述确定了在实现无监督机器学习模型对SNHL亚型的潜力之前需要改进的关键方法实践。该领域的未来研究应证明模型选择的合理性,确保可重复性,使用高质量的听力数据,并验证模型的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ear and Hearing
Ear and Hearing 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: From the basic science of hearing and balance disorders to auditory electrophysiology to amplification and the psychological factors of hearing loss, Ear and Hearing covers all aspects of auditory and vestibular disorders. This multidisciplinary journal consolidates the various factors that contribute to identification, remediation, and audiologic and vestibular rehabilitation. It is the one journal that serves the diverse interest of all members of this professional community -- otologists, audiologists, educators, and to those involved in the design, manufacture, and distribution of amplification systems. The original articles published in the journal focus on assessment, diagnosis, and management of auditory and vestibular disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信