A New Fit Assessment Framework for Common Factor Models Using Generalized Residuals.

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Youjin Sung, Youngjin Han, Yang Liu
{"title":"A New Fit Assessment Framework for Common Factor Models Using Generalized Residuals.","authors":"Youjin Sung, Youngjin Han, Yang Liu","doi":"10.1017/psy.2025.10037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessing fit in common factor models solely through the lens of mean and covariance structures, as is commonly done with conventional goodness-of-fit (GOF) assessments, may overlook critical aspects of misfit, potentially leading to misleading conclusions. To achieve more flexible fit assessment, we extend the theory of generalized residuals (Haberman & Sinharay, 2013), originally developed for models with categorical data, to encompass more general measurement models. Within this extended framework, we propose several fit test statistics designed to evaluate various parametric assumptions involved in common factor models. The examples include assessing the distributional assumptions of latent variables and the functional form assumptions of individual manifest variables. The performance of the proposed statistics is examined through simulation studies and an empirical data analysis. Our findings suggest that generalized residuals are promising tools for detecting misfit in measurement models, often masked when assessed by conventional GOF testing methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":54534,"journal":{"name":"Psychometrika","volume":" ","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychometrika","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/psy.2025.10037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing fit in common factor models solely through the lens of mean and covariance structures, as is commonly done with conventional goodness-of-fit (GOF) assessments, may overlook critical aspects of misfit, potentially leading to misleading conclusions. To achieve more flexible fit assessment, we extend the theory of generalized residuals (Haberman & Sinharay, 2013), originally developed for models with categorical data, to encompass more general measurement models. Within this extended framework, we propose several fit test statistics designed to evaluate various parametric assumptions involved in common factor models. The examples include assessing the distributional assumptions of latent variables and the functional form assumptions of individual manifest variables. The performance of the proposed statistics is examined through simulation studies and an empirical data analysis. Our findings suggest that generalized residuals are promising tools for detecting misfit in measurement models, often masked when assessed by conventional GOF testing methods.

基于广义残差的共因子模型拟合评估新框架。
仅仅通过均值和协方差结构来评估共同因素模型的拟合,就像传统的拟合优度(GOF)评估一样,可能会忽略不拟合的关键方面,从而可能导致误导性结论。为了实现更灵活的拟合评估,我们扩展了广义残差理论(Haberman & Sinharay, 2013),该理论最初是为具有分类数据的模型开发的,以涵盖更一般的测量模型。在这个扩展框架内,我们提出了几个拟合检验统计,旨在评估公共因素模型中涉及的各种参数假设。这些例子包括评估潜在变量的分布假设和单个显变量的函数形式假设。通过模拟研究和实证数据分析来检验所提出的统计数据的性能。我们的研究结果表明,广义残差是检测测量模型中不拟合的有希望的工具,通常在传统的GOF测试方法评估时被掩盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychometrika
Psychometrika 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Psychometrika is devoted to the advancement of theory and methodology for behavioral data in psychology, education and the social and behavioral sciences generally. Its coverage is offered in two sections: Theory and Methods (T& M), and Application Reviews and Case Studies (ARCS). T&M articles present original research and reviews on the development of quantitative models, statistical methods, and mathematical techniques for evaluating data from psychology, the social and behavioral sciences and related fields. Application Reviews can be integrative, drawing together disparate methodologies for applications, or comparative and evaluative, discussing advantages and disadvantages of one or more methodologies in applications. Case Studies highlight methodology that deepens understanding of substantive phenomena through more informative data analysis, or more elegant data description.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信