Subjective appraisal of cognition among American racial groups.

IF 1.5 4区心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2025-08-06 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2025.2539173

Bradley J Dixon, Allison C Moll, John L Woodard

{"title":"Subjective appraisal of cognition among American racial groups.","authors":"Bradley J Dixon, Allison C Moll, John L Woodard","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2539173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: While subjective appraisal of cognition (SAC) has been shown to differ by race, it is unknown whether the consistency between self- and informant reports of cognition varies by race. The present study investigated this gap using a large, community-based cohort of healthy older adults.Methods: Participants and close informants from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center reported the presence or absence of participant memory decline. Four groups were created by combining the participants' and informants' appraisal of the participants' cognition. Bayesian contingency tables and t-tests examined racial group differences.Results: Native Americans reported more cases of cognitive decline compared to Black (BF10 = 7) and White (BF10 = 3.6) Americans. No differences in reports of cognitive decline were found between White, Black, and Asian Americans (BF10 < 0.1). There was also strong evidence that Native Americans reported more depressive symptoms compared to Black (BF10 = 10.5) and White (BF10 = 6.3) Americans after correcting for memory complaints.Discussion: Reports of cognitive decline were similar amongst most racial groups, although Native American participants and their close informants reported cognitive decline more frequently. A limited set of objective cognitive measures did not differ between racial groups. However, slightly greater reported depressive symptoms among Native Americans may partially contribute to the observed differences.","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2539173","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: While subjective appraisal of cognition (SAC) has been shown to differ by race, it is unknown whether the consistency between self- and informant reports of cognition varies by race. The present study investigated this gap using a large, community-based cohort of healthy older adults.

Methods: Participants and close informants from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center reported the presence or absence of participant memory decline. Four groups were created by combining the participants' and informants' appraisal of the participants' cognition. Bayesian contingency tables and t-tests examined racial group differences.

Results: Native Americans reported more cases of cognitive decline compared to Black (BF₁₀ = 7) and White (BF₁₀ = 3.6) Americans. No differences in reports of cognitive decline were found between White, Black, and Asian Americans (BF₁₀ < 0.1). There was also strong evidence that Native Americans reported more depressive symptoms compared to Black (BF₁₀ = 10.5) and White (BF₁₀ = 6.3) Americans after correcting for memory complaints.

Discussion: Reports of cognitive decline were similar amongst most racial groups, although Native American participants and their close informants reported cognitive decline more frequently. A limited set of objective cognitive measures did not differ between racial groups. However, slightly greater reported depressive symptoms among Native Americans may partially contribute to the observed differences.

查看原文本刊更多论文

美国种族群体认知的主观评价。

虽然认知的主观评价（SAC）已被证明因种族而异，但尚不清楚自我和被告知的认知报告之间的一致性是否因种族而异。本研究通过一个以社区为基础的健康老年人大队列来调查这一差距。方法：来自国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心的参与者和亲密线人报告了参与者记忆衰退的存在或不存在。将参与者和举报人对参与者认知的评价结合起来，形成了四组。贝叶斯列联表和t检验检验了种族群体的差异。结果：与黑人（BF10 = 7）和白人（BF10 = 3.6）相比，印第安人报告的认知能力下降病例更多。白人、黑人和亚裔美国人（BF10 = 10.5）和白人美国人（BF10 = 6.3）在纠正记忆抱怨后，认知能力下降的报告没有差异。讨论：在大多数种族群体中，认知能力下降的报告是相似的，尽管美洲原住民参与者和他们的亲密线人报告的认知能力下降更频繁。一组有限的客观认知测量在种族群体之间没有差异。然而，美洲原住民报告的抑郁症状略多，可能部分促成了观察到的差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

11.80%

发文量

134

期刊介绍： pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.