Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating LET and ALL for Anterolateral Rotatory Instability in ACLR Are Fragile: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Avanish Yendluri, Christopher Gonzalez, Niklas H Koehne, Auston R Locke, Adriano Cuadros, David E Kantrowitz, Dennis M Bienstock, Michael J Alaia, Brian R Waterman, Xinning Li, Robert L Parisien
{"title":"Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating LET and ALL for Anterolateral Rotatory Instability in ACLR Are Fragile: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Avanish Yendluri, Christopher Gonzalez, Niklas H Koehne, Auston R Locke, Adriano Cuadros, David E Kantrowitz, Dennis M Bienstock, Michael J Alaia, Brian R Waterman, Xinning Li, Robert L Parisien","doi":"10.1177/19417381251360013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction have been adopted by some surgeons as augmentations during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) to improve anterolateral rotatory instability.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess the statistical robustness of outcomes reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the clinical significance of LET and ALL reconstruction in ACLR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE were systematically searched. RCTs published January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2024 assessing LET and ALL reconstruction during ACLR were included. Fragility index (FI) or reverse FI (rFI) was calculated for each outcome, representing the number of event reversals required to alter statistical significance for significant and nonsignificant outcomes, respectively. The fragility quotient (FQ) was determined by dividing the FI or rFI by sample size.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 112 RCTs screened for inclusion, 17 were included for analysis, resulting in 51 total outcomes. The median FI across the 51 outcomes was 4 [interquartile range (IQR), 2-7] with an associated median FQ of 0.031 (IQR, 0.014-0.049). Statistically significant outcomes were more fragile (median FI, 3.5; median FQ, 0.015) than statistically nonsignificant outcomes (median rFI, 5; median FQ, 0.038). In 60.8% of all outcomes (31 of 51), the number of patients lost to follow-up was greater than the outcome's respective FI or rFI. In the 7 RCTs assessing LET, the median FQ was 0.015 (IQR, 0.012-0.042) across 23 outcomes. In the 10 RCTs assessing ALL, the median FQ was 0.035 (IQR, 0.019-0.051) across 28 outcomes. Graft failure, pivot shift, and Lachman/anterior laxity were the most common outcome categories reported, with median FQs of 0.017, 0.035, and 0.048, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Outcomes reported in RCTs for LET and ALL reconstruction as augments of ACLR are statistically fragile, emphasizing the need for additional robust and adequately powered RCTs to better understand the impact of anterolateral augmentation on ACLR outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54276,"journal":{"name":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","volume":" ","pages":"19417381251360013"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331626/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381251360013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction have been adopted by some surgeons as augmentations during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) to improve anterolateral rotatory instability.

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the statistical robustness of outcomes reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the clinical significance of LET and ALL reconstruction in ACLR.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE were systematically searched. RCTs published January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2024 assessing LET and ALL reconstruction during ACLR were included. Fragility index (FI) or reverse FI (rFI) was calculated for each outcome, representing the number of event reversals required to alter statistical significance for significant and nonsignificant outcomes, respectively. The fragility quotient (FQ) was determined by dividing the FI or rFI by sample size.

Level of evidence: Level 1.

Results: Of 112 RCTs screened for inclusion, 17 were included for analysis, resulting in 51 total outcomes. The median FI across the 51 outcomes was 4 [interquartile range (IQR), 2-7] with an associated median FQ of 0.031 (IQR, 0.014-0.049). Statistically significant outcomes were more fragile (median FI, 3.5; median FQ, 0.015) than statistically nonsignificant outcomes (median rFI, 5; median FQ, 0.038). In 60.8% of all outcomes (31 of 51), the number of patients lost to follow-up was greater than the outcome's respective FI or rFI. In the 7 RCTs assessing LET, the median FQ was 0.015 (IQR, 0.012-0.042) across 23 outcomes. In the 10 RCTs assessing ALL, the median FQ was 0.035 (IQR, 0.019-0.051) across 28 outcomes. Graft failure, pivot shift, and Lachman/anterior laxity were the most common outcome categories reported, with median FQs of 0.017, 0.035, and 0.048, respectively.

Conclusion: Outcomes reported in RCTs for LET and ALL reconstruction as augments of ACLR are statistically fragile, emphasizing the need for additional robust and adequately powered RCTs to better understand the impact of anterolateral augmentation on ACLR outcomes.

随机对照试验评估LET和ALL对ACLR前外侧旋转不稳定性的影响是脆弱的:一项系统综述。
背景:一些外科医生在前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)中采用外侧关节外肌腱固定术(LET)和前外侧韧带(ALL)重建术作为增强手段,以改善前外侧旋转不稳定。目的:本研究的目的是评估评估ACLR中LET和ALL重建临床意义的随机对照试验(RCTs)报告的结果的统计稳健性。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase和MEDLINE。纳入了2010年1月1日至2024年12月31日发表的评估ACLR期间LET和ALL重建的随机对照试验。对每个结果计算脆弱性指数(FI)或反向FI (rFI),分别表示改变显著和不显著结果的统计显著性所需的事件逆转次数。脆弱性商(FQ)由FI或rFI除以样本量确定。证据等级:一级。结果:在筛选纳入的112项随机对照试验中,17项纳入分析,共产生51项结果。51个结果的中位FI为4[四分位数范围(IQR), 2-7],相关的中位FQ为0.031 (IQR, 0.014-0.049)。具有统计学意义的结果更加脆弱(FI中位数,3.5;中位FQ, 0.015)比无统计学意义的结果(中位rFI, 5;中位FQ, 0.038)。在所有结果的60.8%(51例中的31例)中,失去随访的患者数量大于结果各自的FI或rFI。在7个评估LET的随机对照试验中,23个结局的中位FQ为0.015 (IQR, 0.012-0.042)。在评估ALL的10个随机对照试验中,28个结局的中位FQ为0.035 (IQR, 0.019-0.051)。移植物失败、枢轴移位和Lachman/前路松弛是报道的最常见的结果类别,中位FQs分别为0.017、0.035和0.048。结论:在随机对照试验中,作为ACLR增强术的LET和ALL重建的结果在统计学上是脆弱的,这强调了需要额外的可靠的、足够有力的随机对照试验来更好地理解前外侧增强术对ACLR结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach is an indispensable resource for all medical professionals involved in the training and care of the competitive or recreational athlete, including primary care physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, athletic trainers and other medical and health care professionals. Published bimonthly, Sports Health is a collaborative publication from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA), and the Sports Physical Therapy Section (SPTS). The journal publishes review articles, original research articles, case studies, images, short updates, legal briefs, editorials, and letters to the editor. Topics include: -Sports Injury and Treatment -Care of the Athlete -Athlete Rehabilitation -Medical Issues in the Athlete -Surgical Techniques in Sports Medicine -Case Studies in Sports Medicine -Images in Sports Medicine -Legal Issues -Pediatric Athletes -General Sports Trauma -Sports Psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信