Relationship between COVID-19 stigma and anxiety symptoms in university students during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Keyong Luo, Lei Ren, Jia Wang, Chang Liu, Xi Luo, Kuiliang Li
{"title":"Relationship between COVID-19 stigma and anxiety symptoms in university students during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Keyong Luo, Lei Ren, Jia Wang, Chang Liu, Xi Luo, Kuiliang Li","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-02900-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic after isolation removal increased stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety, but there is a lack of studies analyzing the relationship between stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety symptoms after isolation lifting. This study aimed to explore the complex relationship between the SARS-CoV-2 stigma and anxiety symptoms in patients with SARS-CoV-2 and healthy populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey in which 1,730 university students reported COVID-19 stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety symptoms. These included university students who were either infected or uninfected individuals. We estimated the complex relationship between stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety symptoms using network analysis methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety observed in the infected group were 32.86% and 28.28%, respectively, and in the uninfected group were 34.64% and 22.79%, respectively. Network analysis showed that A2 (Uncontrollable worry) had the strongest expected influence centrality and S1 (Stereotype) had the strongest bridge expected influence centrality; network comparative analysis of the infected and uninfected groups revealed a significant difference in the expected influence centrality for S1; and directed acyclic graph analysis showed that node A2 had the highest priority.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We recommend developing appropriate strategies for safeguards, such as the dissemination of relevant knowledge to at-risk populations, to cope with stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety symptoms among university students.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02900-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic after isolation removal increased stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety, but there is a lack of studies analyzing the relationship between stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety symptoms after isolation lifting. This study aimed to explore the complex relationship between the SARS-CoV-2 stigma and anxiety symptoms in patients with SARS-CoV-2 and healthy populations.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in which 1,730 university students reported COVID-19 stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety symptoms. These included university students who were either infected or uninfected individuals. We estimated the complex relationship between stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety symptoms using network analysis methods.

Results: During the COVID-19 pandemic, stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety observed in the infected group were 32.86% and 28.28%, respectively, and in the uninfected group were 34.64% and 22.79%, respectively. Network analysis showed that A2 (Uncontrollable worry) had the strongest expected influence centrality and S1 (Stereotype) had the strongest bridge expected influence centrality; network comparative analysis of the infected and uninfected groups revealed a significant difference in the expected influence centrality for S1; and directed acyclic graph analysis showed that node A2 had the highest priority.

Conclusion: We recommend developing appropriate strategies for safeguards, such as the dissemination of relevant knowledge to at-risk populations, to cope with stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety symptoms among university students.

2019冠状病毒病病耻感与大学生焦虑症状的关系
背景:解除隔离后的COVID-19大流行增加了污名化态度和焦虑,但缺乏分析解除隔离后污名化态度与焦虑症状之间关系的研究。本研究旨在探讨SARS-CoV-2患者和健康人群中SARS-CoV-2耻辱感与焦虑症状之间的复杂关系。方法:对1730名大学生进行横断面调查,报告了对新冠肺炎的污名化态度和焦虑症状。其中包括感染或未感染的大学生。我们使用网络分析方法估计了污名化态度与焦虑症状之间的复杂关系。结果:新冠肺炎大流行期间,感染组的污名化态度和焦虑情绪分别为32.86%和28.28%,未感染组分别为34.64%和22.79%。网络分析表明,A2(不可控担忧)的预期影响中心性最强,S1(刻板印象)的桥式预期影响中心性最强;感染组和未感染组的网络比较分析显示,S1的预期影响中心性存在显著差异;有向无环图分析表明,节点A2具有最高的优先级。结论:我们建议制定适当的保障战略,例如向高危人群传播相关知识,以应对大学生中的污名化态度和焦虑症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.30%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic. In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation. Both original work and review articles may be submitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信