Keyong Luo, Lei Ren, Jia Wang, Chang Liu, Xi Luo, Kuiliang Li
{"title":"Relationship between COVID-19 stigma and anxiety symptoms in university students during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Keyong Luo, Lei Ren, Jia Wang, Chang Liu, Xi Luo, Kuiliang Li","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-02900-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic after isolation removal increased stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety, but there is a lack of studies analyzing the relationship between stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety symptoms after isolation lifting. This study aimed to explore the complex relationship between the SARS-CoV-2 stigma and anxiety symptoms in patients with SARS-CoV-2 and healthy populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey in which 1,730 university students reported COVID-19 stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety symptoms. These included university students who were either infected or uninfected individuals. We estimated the complex relationship between stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety symptoms using network analysis methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety observed in the infected group were 32.86% and 28.28%, respectively, and in the uninfected group were 34.64% and 22.79%, respectively. Network analysis showed that A2 (Uncontrollable worry) had the strongest expected influence centrality and S1 (Stereotype) had the strongest bridge expected influence centrality; network comparative analysis of the infected and uninfected groups revealed a significant difference in the expected influence centrality for S1; and directed acyclic graph analysis showed that node A2 had the highest priority.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We recommend developing appropriate strategies for safeguards, such as the dissemination of relevant knowledge to at-risk populations, to cope with stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety symptoms among university students.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02900-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic after isolation removal increased stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety, but there is a lack of studies analyzing the relationship between stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety symptoms after isolation lifting. This study aimed to explore the complex relationship between the SARS-CoV-2 stigma and anxiety symptoms in patients with SARS-CoV-2 and healthy populations.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in which 1,730 university students reported COVID-19 stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety symptoms. These included university students who were either infected or uninfected individuals. We estimated the complex relationship between stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety symptoms using network analysis methods.
Results: During the COVID-19 pandemic, stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety observed in the infected group were 32.86% and 28.28%, respectively, and in the uninfected group were 34.64% and 22.79%, respectively. Network analysis showed that A2 (Uncontrollable worry) had the strongest expected influence centrality and S1 (Stereotype) had the strongest bridge expected influence centrality; network comparative analysis of the infected and uninfected groups revealed a significant difference in the expected influence centrality for S1; and directed acyclic graph analysis showed that node A2 had the highest priority.
Conclusion: We recommend developing appropriate strategies for safeguards, such as the dissemination of relevant knowledge to at-risk populations, to cope with stigmatizing attitudes and anxiety symptoms among university students.
期刊介绍:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic.
In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation.
Both original work and review articles may be submitted.