Nutrition Users' Guides: an introduction to structured guides to evaluate the nutrition literature.

IF 2.5 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health Pub Date : 2025-04-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjnph-2023-000832
Bradley C Johnston, Mary Rozga, Gordon H Guyatt, Rosa K Hand, Deepa Handu, Kevin C Klatt, Malgorzata M Bala
{"title":"Nutrition Users' Guides: an introduction to structured guides to evaluate the nutrition literature.","authors":"Bradley C Johnston, Mary Rozga, Gordon H Guyatt, Rosa K Hand, Deepa Handu, Kevin C Klatt, Malgorzata M Bala","doi":"10.1136/bmjnph-2023-000832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite evidence that nutrition can play a substantial role in curbing the burden of chronic disease, findings reported in the nutrition literature have been plagued with debate and uncertainty, including questions about the confidence we can place in evidence from observational studies, the validity of dietary intake data, and the applicability of randomised trials to real-world patients or members of the public. Structured nutrition users' guides (NUGs) to evaluate common research study designs (ie, randomised trials, cohort studies, systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines) addressing nutrition questions will help clinicians and their patients, as well as health service workers and policy-makers, use the evidence to make more informed decisions on disease management and prevention. In addition, NUGs will provide comprehensive teaching materials for nutrition trainees on how to appraise, interpret and apply the research evidence. We hereby introduce a series of structured NUGs for the literature on nutrients, foods and dietary patterns and programmes. Each article will address three key components when assessing different study designs used to assess nutrition interventions or exposures, including (1) assessing the methodological quality of the study, (2) interpreting study results (magnitude and precision of treatment or exposure effects for outcomes of benefit and harm) and (3) applying the results to unique patient or population scenarios based on their health-related values and preferences related to the potential benefits, harms, convenience and cost of an intervention. This series of articles will serve to empower clinicians, health service workers and health policy-makers to better understand the validity, interpretability and applicability of the nutrition literature, while also helping practitioners and their clients make more evidence-based, value-sensitive and preference-sensitive nutrition decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":36307,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","volume":"8 1","pages":"e000832"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12322572/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2023-000832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite evidence that nutrition can play a substantial role in curbing the burden of chronic disease, findings reported in the nutrition literature have been plagued with debate and uncertainty, including questions about the confidence we can place in evidence from observational studies, the validity of dietary intake data, and the applicability of randomised trials to real-world patients or members of the public. Structured nutrition users' guides (NUGs) to evaluate common research study designs (ie, randomised trials, cohort studies, systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines) addressing nutrition questions will help clinicians and their patients, as well as health service workers and policy-makers, use the evidence to make more informed decisions on disease management and prevention. In addition, NUGs will provide comprehensive teaching materials for nutrition trainees on how to appraise, interpret and apply the research evidence. We hereby introduce a series of structured NUGs for the literature on nutrients, foods and dietary patterns and programmes. Each article will address three key components when assessing different study designs used to assess nutrition interventions or exposures, including (1) assessing the methodological quality of the study, (2) interpreting study results (magnitude and precision of treatment or exposure effects for outcomes of benefit and harm) and (3) applying the results to unique patient or population scenarios based on their health-related values and preferences related to the potential benefits, harms, convenience and cost of an intervention. This series of articles will serve to empower clinicians, health service workers and health policy-makers to better understand the validity, interpretability and applicability of the nutrition literature, while also helping practitioners and their clients make more evidence-based, value-sensitive and preference-sensitive nutrition decisions.

营养用户指南:对评估营养文献的结构化指南的介绍。
尽管有证据表明营养可以在减轻慢性疾病负担方面发挥重要作用,但营养文献中报告的研究结果一直受到争议和不确定性的困扰,包括我们对观察性研究证据的信心、饮食摄入数据的有效性以及随机试验对现实世界患者或公众成员的适用性等问题。结构化营养用户指南(nug)用于评估解决营养问题的常见研究设计(即随机试验、队列研究、系统评价和临床实践指南),将帮助临床医生及其患者、卫生服务工作者和决策者利用证据在疾病管理和预防方面做出更明智的决策。此外,NUGs还将为营养学员提供如何评估、解释和应用研究证据的综合教材。我们在此介绍一系列关于营养、食物、饮食模式和计划的结构化NUGs。在评估用于评估营养干预或暴露的不同研究设计时,每篇文章将讨论三个关键组成部分,包括(1)评估研究的方法学质量,(2)解释研究结果(治疗或暴露对结果的利弊影响的幅度和精度),以及(3)根据与潜在益处、危害相关的与健康相关的价值观和偏好,将结果应用于独特的患者或人群情景。干预的便利性和成本。本系列文章将有助于临床医生、卫生服务工作者和卫生政策制定者更好地理解营养文献的有效性、可解释性和适用性,同时也有助于从业人员及其客户做出更多基于证据、价值敏感和偏好敏感的营养决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信