Daan Leonhard de Frel, Veronica R Janssen, Hope Wicks, Zsuzsa Bakk, Nicole van Keulen, Maaike S Kleinsmann, Willem Jj Assendelft, Douwe Atsma
{"title":"In-hospital nudging intervention increases patients' healthy dietary choices: a quasi-experimental study.","authors":"Daan Leonhard de Frel, Veronica R Janssen, Hope Wicks, Zsuzsa Bakk, Nicole van Keulen, Maaike S Kleinsmann, Willem Jj Assendelft, Douwe Atsma","doi":"10.1136/bmjnph-2024-001059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Most hospitals still lag behind in their policies to stimulate healthier dietary choices by their patients. This study investigates whether a multicomponent nudging intervention, designed to prompt healthy food choices, can influence dietary choices of hospitalised patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This pre-postintervention study included a baseline phase and an intervention phase (7+7 months) and was carried out at the cardiology ward of a large hospital. All 2419 cardiac patients admitted to the ward during this period, and their 7559 meals were part of this study. The nudging intervention consisted of choice architecture, visual cues and informational nudges (eg, traffic light menus, posters). Data on dietary choices (vegetarian, fish, meat, side salad and fruit salad) were collected from the electronic food ordering system. As a secondary outcome, the intention to eat healthy after discharge was measured using the 20-item long Dutch Dietary Intention Evaluation Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the intervention period, there was a statistically significant increase in the selection of vegetarian meals (20.1% vs 16.3%, p<0.001), fish meals (24.6% vs 18.7%, p<0.001), side salads (54.5% vs 49.5%, p<0.001) and fruit salads (12.8% vs 8.6%, p<0.001) when compared with the baseline period. In addition, patients in the intervention period expressed a significantly higher intention to eat healthy after discharge compared with the baseline period (β=0.167, SE=0.083, p=0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that a straightforward, easily implementable nudging intervention effectively promotes healthy dietary choices among in-hospital cardiac patients and enhances their intention to eat healthy after discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":36307,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","volume":"8 1","pages":"e001059"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12322546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2024-001059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Most hospitals still lag behind in their policies to stimulate healthier dietary choices by their patients. This study investigates whether a multicomponent nudging intervention, designed to prompt healthy food choices, can influence dietary choices of hospitalised patients.
Methods: This pre-postintervention study included a baseline phase and an intervention phase (7+7 months) and was carried out at the cardiology ward of a large hospital. All 2419 cardiac patients admitted to the ward during this period, and their 7559 meals were part of this study. The nudging intervention consisted of choice architecture, visual cues and informational nudges (eg, traffic light menus, posters). Data on dietary choices (vegetarian, fish, meat, side salad and fruit salad) were collected from the electronic food ordering system. As a secondary outcome, the intention to eat healthy after discharge was measured using the 20-item long Dutch Dietary Intention Evaluation Tool.
Results: During the intervention period, there was a statistically significant increase in the selection of vegetarian meals (20.1% vs 16.3%, p<0.001), fish meals (24.6% vs 18.7%, p<0.001), side salads (54.5% vs 49.5%, p<0.001) and fruit salads (12.8% vs 8.6%, p<0.001) when compared with the baseline period. In addition, patients in the intervention period expressed a significantly higher intention to eat healthy after discharge compared with the baseline period (β=0.167, SE=0.083, p=0.045).
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that a straightforward, easily implementable nudging intervention effectively promotes healthy dietary choices among in-hospital cardiac patients and enhances their intention to eat healthy after discharge.
目的:大多数医院在鼓励患者选择更健康的饮食方面仍然落后。本研究调查了一种旨在促进健康食品选择的多成分轻推干预是否能影响住院患者的饮食选择。方法:本研究在某大型医院心内科病房进行,包括基线期和干预期(7+7个月)。在此期间,所有2419名心脏病患者和他们的7559顿饭都是这项研究的一部分。推动干预包括选择建筑、视觉提示和信息推动(如交通灯菜单、海报)。饮食选择的数据(素食、鱼、肉、配菜沙拉和水果沙拉)是从电子订餐系统中收集的。作为次要结果,出院后健康饮食的意向使用20项长的荷兰饮食意向评估工具进行测量。结果:在干预期间,选择素食膳食的人数有统计学意义的增加(20.1% vs 16.3%)。结论:本研究表明,简单易行的轻推干预有效地促进了住院心脏病患者的健康饮食选择,增强了他们出院后健康饮食的意愿。