Assessing the relationship between training load and injury in ultramarathon runners: a novel approach using Generalised Additive Models.

Q3 Health Professions
South African Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.17159/2078-516X/2025/v37i1a20747
T L Burgess, P Durand, K Buchholtz
{"title":"Assessing the relationship between training load and injury in ultramarathon runners: a novel approach using Generalised Additive Models.","authors":"T L Burgess, P Durand, K Buchholtz","doi":"10.17159/2078-516X/2025/v37i1a20747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultramarathon running presents significant injury risks, and monitoring training loads may identify risk factors for injury. Injury surveillance studies are required to better assess injury prevalence and its relationship to training loads.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the incidence and nature of running-related injuries and associated training loads in runners 12 weeks before and two weeks after the 2018 Comrades ultramarathon.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and six participants were recruited. Their weekly injury and training load data (distance, duration, frequency and acute-chronic workload ratio) were obtained retrospectively over 14 weeks. The relationship between training load variables and injury risk was modelled using Generalised Additive Models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The running-related injury incidence was 8/1000 hours. The overall injury proportion was 40%. The commonly injured structures were muscles (47%) followed by tendons (24%). Commonly reported anatomical areas of injury were the knee (26%) and hip (19%). Lower training load distance in the 12 weeks leading up to the race was linked to a higher risk of injury (p=0.02), primarily occurring during or after the race. Weekly training frequency and injury risk showed a significant heterogeneous relationship (p=0.02). The effect of the acute to chronic workload ratio on injury risk was minimal (p=0.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lower training loads were associated with a higher risk for injury, and the frequency of running training per week influenced injury risk. Insufficient training may not prepare the runners for the demands of the ultradistance race. Sudden changes in training load (evident in the acute training load measurements) appeared to have a minimal effect on injury risk. The non-linear relationship between several training load variables and injury risk can successfully be modelled using Generalised Additive Models, which may improve the accuracy of injury prediction modelling in ultramarathon runners.</p>","PeriodicalId":31065,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"37 1","pages":"v37i1a20747"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12327882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2078-516X/2025/v37i1a20747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ultramarathon running presents significant injury risks, and monitoring training loads may identify risk factors for injury. Injury surveillance studies are required to better assess injury prevalence and its relationship to training loads.

Objectives: To determine the incidence and nature of running-related injuries and associated training loads in runners 12 weeks before and two weeks after the 2018 Comrades ultramarathon.

Methods: One hundred and six participants were recruited. Their weekly injury and training load data (distance, duration, frequency and acute-chronic workload ratio) were obtained retrospectively over 14 weeks. The relationship between training load variables and injury risk was modelled using Generalised Additive Models.

Results: The running-related injury incidence was 8/1000 hours. The overall injury proportion was 40%. The commonly injured structures were muscles (47%) followed by tendons (24%). Commonly reported anatomical areas of injury were the knee (26%) and hip (19%). Lower training load distance in the 12 weeks leading up to the race was linked to a higher risk of injury (p=0.02), primarily occurring during or after the race. Weekly training frequency and injury risk showed a significant heterogeneous relationship (p=0.02). The effect of the acute to chronic workload ratio on injury risk was minimal (p=0.3).

Conclusion: Lower training loads were associated with a higher risk for injury, and the frequency of running training per week influenced injury risk. Insufficient training may not prepare the runners for the demands of the ultradistance race. Sudden changes in training load (evident in the acute training load measurements) appeared to have a minimal effect on injury risk. The non-linear relationship between several training load variables and injury risk can successfully be modelled using Generalised Additive Models, which may improve the accuracy of injury prediction modelling in ultramarathon runners.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估超级马拉松运动员训练负荷和损伤之间的关系:一种使用广义加性模型的新方法。
背景:超级马拉松跑步存在明显的损伤风险,监测训练负荷可以识别损伤的危险因素。需要进行损伤监测研究,以更好地评估损伤发生率及其与训练负荷的关系。目的:确定2018同志超级马拉松比赛前12周和后两周跑步者跑步相关损伤的发生率和性质以及相关的训练负荷。方法:共招募106名受试者。他们的每周损伤和训练负荷数据(距离、持续时间、频率和急慢性负荷比)在14周内回顾性获得。使用广义加性模型对训练负荷变量与损伤风险之间的关系进行建模。结果:跑步损伤发生率为8/1000小时。整体损伤比例为40%。最常见的损伤结构是肌肉(47%),其次是肌腱(24%)。常见的损伤解剖部位是膝关节(26%)和髋关节(19%)。在比赛前的12周内,较低的训练负荷距离与较高的受伤风险有关(p=0.02),主要发生在比赛期间或之后。每周训练频率与损伤风险呈显著的异质性关系(p=0.02)。急慢性负荷比对损伤风险的影响最小(p=0.3)。结论:较低的训练负荷与较高的损伤风险相关,每周跑步训练的频率影响损伤风险。训练不足可能使运动员无法为超长距离比赛的要求做好准备。训练负荷的突然变化(在急性训练负荷测量中很明显)似乎对受伤风险的影响最小。应用广义加性模型成功地建立了多个训练负荷变量与损伤风险之间的非线性关系,从而提高了超级马拉松运动员损伤预测模型的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信