CASCOM Study: CAR Score Predicting Restroke in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis With Only Intensive Medical Therapy.

IF 8.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stroke Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-07 DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.052151
Saeid Shahidi, Troels Wienecke, Emilie Noeddeskov Eilersen, Magdalena Broda, Anna Pelta, Stefan Andreas Zambach
{"title":"CASCOM Study: CAR Score Predicting Restroke in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis With Only Intensive Medical Therapy.","authors":"Saeid Shahidi, Troels Wienecke, Emilie Noeddeskov Eilersen, Magdalena Broda, Anna Pelta, Stefan Andreas Zambach","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.052151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis is based on decades-old trials, while modern medical therapy has substantially improved outcomes. The carotid artery risk (CAR) score predicts stroke risk using clinical and imaging factors. This study evaluates the 2-year risk of recurrent ipsilateral stroke in patients with recent transient ischemic attack, amaurosis fugax, or minor stroke and ipsilateral symptomatic carotid stenosis treated with intensive medical therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, single-arm observational study conducted in Denmark from October 2020 to March 2023, we enrolled 109 patients with recent TIA, amaurosis fugax, or minor stroke and 50% to 99% ipsilateral symptomatic carotid stenosis. Patients with a CAR score ≤20% or >20%, as well as those with contraindications to surgery, were included. All received intensive medical therapy. The primary outcome was ipsilateral recurrent stroke or death within 2 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 73 years; 60% were male patients. Six patients (5.5%) experienced ipsilateral recurrent stroke, representing a ≈75% reduction compared with historical NASCET (North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial) rates (≈23%). Patients with CAR score ≤20% (n=96) had a significantly lower 2-year stroke rate (3.1%) than those with CAR score >20% (n=13; 23%; <i>P</i>=0.02). The CAR score ≤20% subgroup showed high predictive accuracy: sensitivity of 0.90, specificity of 0.50, and positive predictive value of 0.97.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this observational study, modern medical therapy was associated with low rates of recurrent stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Patients with a CAR score ≤20% had a very low risk of recurrent stroke, suggesting that selected patients may be managed conservatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"3072-3077"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.052151","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis is based on decades-old trials, while modern medical therapy has substantially improved outcomes. The carotid artery risk (CAR) score predicts stroke risk using clinical and imaging factors. This study evaluates the 2-year risk of recurrent ipsilateral stroke in patients with recent transient ischemic attack, amaurosis fugax, or minor stroke and ipsilateral symptomatic carotid stenosis treated with intensive medical therapy.

Methods: In this prospective, single-arm observational study conducted in Denmark from October 2020 to March 2023, we enrolled 109 patients with recent TIA, amaurosis fugax, or minor stroke and 50% to 99% ipsilateral symptomatic carotid stenosis. Patients with a CAR score ≤20% or >20%, as well as those with contraindications to surgery, were included. All received intensive medical therapy. The primary outcome was ipsilateral recurrent stroke or death within 2 years.

Results: The mean age was 73 years; 60% were male patients. Six patients (5.5%) experienced ipsilateral recurrent stroke, representing a ≈75% reduction compared with historical NASCET (North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial) rates (≈23%). Patients with CAR score ≤20% (n=96) had a significantly lower 2-year stroke rate (3.1%) than those with CAR score >20% (n=13; 23%; P=0.02). The CAR score ≤20% subgroup showed high predictive accuracy: sensitivity of 0.90, specificity of 0.50, and positive predictive value of 0.97.

Conclusions: In this observational study, modern medical therapy was associated with low rates of recurrent stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Patients with a CAR score ≤20% had a very low risk of recurrent stroke, suggesting that selected patients may be managed conservatively.

CASCOM研究:CAR评分预测症状性颈动脉狭窄患者仅接受强化药物治疗再卒中
背景:颈动脉内膜切除术治疗症状性颈动脉狭窄是基于几十年前的试验,而现代医学治疗已经大大改善了结果。颈动脉风险(CAR)评分通过临床和影像学因素预测卒中风险。本研究评估近期短暂性脑缺血发作、隐匿性黑朦、轻微脑卒中和同侧症状性颈动脉狭窄患者接受强化药物治疗后2年内同侧脑卒中复发的风险。方法:在2020年10月至2023年3月在丹麦进行的这项前瞻性单臂观察性研究中,我们招募了109例近期TIA、烟性黑朦或轻微卒中且50%至99%患有同侧症状性颈动脉狭窄的患者。CAR评分≤20%或>20%的患者以及有手术禁忌症的患者被纳入研究。所有人都接受了强化治疗。主要终点为2年内同侧卒中复发或死亡。结果:患者平均年龄73岁;60%为男性患者。6名患者(5.5%)经历了同侧复发性卒中,与历史上NASCET(北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验)的发生率(≈23%)相比,减少了约75%。CAR评分≤20% (n=96)的患者2年卒中发生率(3.1%)明显低于CAR评分≤20% (n=13;23%;P = 0.02)。CAR评分≤20%亚组预测准确率较高,敏感性为0.90,特异性为0.50,阳性预测值为0.97。结论:在这项观察性研究中,现代药物治疗与症状性颈动脉狭窄患者卒中复发率低相关。CAR评分≤20%的患者卒中复发风险较低,建议对选定的患者进行保守治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信