Verification of Pathologic ECV Estimated with Clinical T1 Mapping Methods Using an Isotope-based Reference.

IF 4.2 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
David Nordlund, Sascha Kopic, Robert Jablonowski, Christos Xanthis, Sebastian Bidhult, Jonathan Berg, Mikael Kanski, Kelvin Chow, Anthony H Aletras, Håkan Arheden
{"title":"Verification of Pathologic ECV Estimated with Clinical T1 Mapping Methods Using an Isotope-based Reference.","authors":"David Nordlund, Sascha Kopic, Robert Jablonowski, Christos Xanthis, Sebastian Bidhult, Jonathan Berg, Mikael Kanski, Kelvin Chow, Anthony H Aletras, Håkan Arheden","doi":"10.1148/ryct.240441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To verify the accuracy of clinically used cardiac MRI T1 mapping sequences for measuring extracellular volume fraction (ECV) throughout the spectrum of pathologic values using an independent reference standard. Materials and Methods Acute myocardial ischemia was induced in six pigs using endovascular balloon occlusion in the left anterior descending artery between October 2018 and November 2018. After 7 days of reperfusion, ECV was measured in vivo using four sequences: three modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) and one saturation recovery single-shot acquisition (SASHA) sequences. ECV was also measured using ex vivo SPECT following injection of technetium 99m diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid. ECV was calculated for corresponding regions of interest of necrosis on cardiac MR and SPECT images and in myocardium remote from injury. Mixed model analysis was used to test for correlation, while the paired <i>t</i> test was used to test for differences in T1 and ECV. Results ECV measurements with all T1 mapping sequences showed high correlation to the reference standard (<i>r<sup>2</sup></i> range, 0.71-0.99). Measurements with MOLLI 5(3)3 and MOLLI 5s(3s)3s overestimated ECV in the infarct region compared with the reference standard (bias ± 2 SDs: 8.2% ± 8.5 and 4.9% ± 8.7; <i>P</i> = .005 and <i>P</i> = .04, respectively). All sequences showed overestimation of ECV in the remote region (range of bias, 3%-14% points, all MOLLI <i>P</i> values ≤ .001, SASHA <i>P</i> = .04). Conclusion This study verified the accuracy of clinically used T1 mapping sequences in measuring ECV in absolute values over a spectrum of pathologic values, using an independent radioisotope-based three-dimensionally acquired reference standard. <b>Keywords:</b> Animal Studies, MR Imaging, Cardiac, Edema, Imaging Sequences, Ischemia/Infarction <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":21168,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","volume":"7 4","pages":"e240441"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryct.240441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose To verify the accuracy of clinically used cardiac MRI T1 mapping sequences for measuring extracellular volume fraction (ECV) throughout the spectrum of pathologic values using an independent reference standard. Materials and Methods Acute myocardial ischemia was induced in six pigs using endovascular balloon occlusion in the left anterior descending artery between October 2018 and November 2018. After 7 days of reperfusion, ECV was measured in vivo using four sequences: three modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) and one saturation recovery single-shot acquisition (SASHA) sequences. ECV was also measured using ex vivo SPECT following injection of technetium 99m diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid. ECV was calculated for corresponding regions of interest of necrosis on cardiac MR and SPECT images and in myocardium remote from injury. Mixed model analysis was used to test for correlation, while the paired t test was used to test for differences in T1 and ECV. Results ECV measurements with all T1 mapping sequences showed high correlation to the reference standard (r2 range, 0.71-0.99). Measurements with MOLLI 5(3)3 and MOLLI 5s(3s)3s overestimated ECV in the infarct region compared with the reference standard (bias ± 2 SDs: 8.2% ± 8.5 and 4.9% ± 8.7; P = .005 and P = .04, respectively). All sequences showed overestimation of ECV in the remote region (range of bias, 3%-14% points, all MOLLI P values ≤ .001, SASHA P = .04). Conclusion This study verified the accuracy of clinically used T1 mapping sequences in measuring ECV in absolute values over a spectrum of pathologic values, using an independent radioisotope-based three-dimensionally acquired reference standard. Keywords: Animal Studies, MR Imaging, Cardiac, Edema, Imaging Sequences, Ischemia/Infarction Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2025.

使用基于同位素参考的临床T1定位方法评估病理性ECV的验证。
目的验证临床使用的心脏MRI T1定位序列在整个病理值谱中测量细胞外体积分数(ECV)的准确性,使用独立的参考标准。材料与方法2018年10月~ 2018年11月,采用左前降支血管内球囊闭塞术诱导6头猪急性心肌缺血。再灌注7天后,使用四个序列在体内测量ECV:三个改良的Look-Locker反转恢复(MOLLI)序列和一个饱和恢复单次采集(SASHA)序列。注射99m二乙烯三胺五乙酸后,用离体SPECT测量ECV。计算心肌MR和SPECT图像上坏死感兴趣的相应区域以及远离损伤的心肌的ECV。采用混合模型分析检验相关性,采用配对t检验检验T1和ECV的差异。结果所有T1定位序列的ECV测量值与参比标准具有较高的相关性(r2范围为0.71 ~ 0.99)。与参考标准相比,MOLLI 5(3)3和MOLLI 5s(3s)3s测量结果高估了梗死区ECV(偏差±2标准差:8.2%±8.5和4.9%±8.7;P = 0.005和P = 0.04)。所有序列在偏远地区均出现ECV高估(偏差范围为3% ~ 14%点,MOLLI P值均≤0.001,SASHA P = 0.04)。结论本研究验证了临床使用的T1定位序列在病理值光谱上测量ECV绝对值的准确性,使用独立的基于放射性同位素的三维获得参考标准。关键词:动物研究,磁共振成像,心脏,水肿,成像序列,缺血/梗死。©rsna, 2025。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
1.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信