Munir Ibn Mahin, Md Shamsur Rahman, Sk Mustafizur Rahman, Fahmida Binte Ilias, Md Mehedi Hasan, Mafia Akter, Abdul Rabbi Mredul
{"title":"Factors impacting university students' quality of life.","authors":"Munir Ibn Mahin, Md Shamsur Rahman, Sk Mustafizur Rahman, Fahmida Binte Ilias, Md Mehedi Hasan, Mafia Akter, Abdul Rabbi Mredul","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0329851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Quality of life (QoL) is a broad multidimensional concept that incorporates a person's physical health, psychological well-being, social relations, and environmental factors. Although previous studies have explored QoL among students in health-related disciplines, limited research has assessed QoL in students from diverse academic programs in Bangladesh. This study sought to assess the QoL of University students in Bangladesh and to identify the key factors that determine it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 417 students were recruited from Daffodil International University. Data were obtained using the WHOQoL-BREF, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), and a structured questionnaire that included information pertaining to sociodemographic and lifestyle variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest mean score was observed in the social relationships domain (62.93%), while the environmental health domain had the lowest (58.07%). Students who were physically active and had normal self-esteem reported significantly higher scores across physical and psychological health domains. Poor sleep quality, low self-esteem, and lack of exercise were consistently associated with lower QoL scores, particularly in the physical, psychological, and social domains. Female students also reported significantly lower scores than males in three of the four domains. The most consistent and strongest predictors of quality of life across domains were self-esteem and sleep quality, followed by gender, physical activity, and screen time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the significant impact of emotional, behavioral, and lifestyle factors on the quality of life of university students. These understandings reinforce the need for campus-based interventions that prioritize mental health support, encourage regular physical exercise, and promote sleep hygiene. Such efforts are essential to enhancing overall student well-being and fostering a healthier, more resilient academic community.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 8","pages":"e0329851"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12327633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0329851","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Quality of life (QoL) is a broad multidimensional concept that incorporates a person's physical health, psychological well-being, social relations, and environmental factors. Although previous studies have explored QoL among students in health-related disciplines, limited research has assessed QoL in students from diverse academic programs in Bangladesh. This study sought to assess the QoL of University students in Bangladesh and to identify the key factors that determine it.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 417 students were recruited from Daffodil International University. Data were obtained using the WHOQoL-BREF, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), and a structured questionnaire that included information pertaining to sociodemographic and lifestyle variables.
Results: The highest mean score was observed in the social relationships domain (62.93%), while the environmental health domain had the lowest (58.07%). Students who were physically active and had normal self-esteem reported significantly higher scores across physical and psychological health domains. Poor sleep quality, low self-esteem, and lack of exercise were consistently associated with lower QoL scores, particularly in the physical, psychological, and social domains. Female students also reported significantly lower scores than males in three of the four domains. The most consistent and strongest predictors of quality of life across domains were self-esteem and sleep quality, followed by gender, physical activity, and screen time.
Conclusion: The findings highlight the significant impact of emotional, behavioral, and lifestyle factors on the quality of life of university students. These understandings reinforce the need for campus-based interventions that prioritize mental health support, encourage regular physical exercise, and promote sleep hygiene. Such efforts are essential to enhancing overall student well-being and fostering a healthier, more resilient academic community.
生活质量(Quality of life, QoL)是一个广泛的多维概念,它包含了一个人的身体健康、心理健康、社会关系和环境因素。虽然以前的研究已经探讨了健康相关学科学生的生活质量,但有限的研究评估了孟加拉国不同学术项目学生的生活质量。本研究旨在评估孟加拉国大学生的生活质量,并确定决定其生活质量的关键因素。方法:在横断面研究中,从水仙国际大学招募了417名学生。数据采用WHOQoL-BREF、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)、罗森伯格自尊量表(RSES)和包含社会人口统计学和生活方式变量信息的结构化问卷获得。结果:社会关系领域平均得分最高(62.93%),环境卫生领域平均得分最低(58.07%)。那些身体活跃、自尊正常的学生在生理和心理健康领域的得分明显更高。睡眠质量差、自尊心低和缺乏锻炼一直与较低的生活质量得分有关,尤其是在身体、心理和社会领域。女生在四个领域中的三个领域的得分也明显低于男生。跨领域的生活质量最一致和最强的预测因素是自尊和睡眠质量,其次是性别、体育活动和屏幕时间。结论:情绪因素、行为因素和生活方式因素对大学生生活质量有显著影响。这些认识加强了以校园为基础的干预措施的必要性,优先考虑心理健康支持,鼓励定期体育锻炼,促进睡眠卫生。这些努力对于提高学生的整体福祉和培养一个更健康、更有弹性的学术社区至关重要。
期刊介绍:
PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides:
* Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright
* Fast publication times
* Peer review by expert, practicing researchers
* Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact
* Community-based dialogue on articles
* Worldwide media coverage