Prevalence and Risk Indicators of Peri-Implant Diseases and Buccal Soft-Tissue Dehiscence: A Cross-Sectional Study From a University-Based Cohort.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Giacomo Baima, Federica Romano, Sompol Chuachamsai, Marta Ciccarelli, Andrea Lo Giudice, Marco Ventricelli, Giulia Maria Mariani, Mario Romandini, Gianmario Schierano, Mario Aimetti
{"title":"Prevalence and Risk Indicators of Peri-Implant Diseases and Buccal Soft-Tissue Dehiscence: A Cross-Sectional Study From a University-Based Cohort.","authors":"Giacomo Baima, Federica Romano, Sompol Chuachamsai, Marta Ciccarelli, Andrea Lo Giudice, Marco Ventricelli, Giulia Maria Mariani, Mario Romandini, Gianmario Schierano, Mario Aimetti","doi":"10.1111/jre.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the prevalence of peri-implant diseases and buccal peri-implant soft-tissue dehiscence (PISTD) and to identify the associated risk indicators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients previously rehabilitated with implant-supported rehabilitations at the University of Turin Dental School were specifically recalled with a registry-based approach for this cross-sectional study. Data collection included medical and dental history, full-mouth clinical examination, and periapical radiographs. Moderate/severe peri-implantitis was diagnosed based on bone loss (direct criterion, when available) or bone level (indirect criterion) ≥ 2 mm and the presence of bleeding/suppuration. PISTD was defined as mucosal dehiscence on the buccal aspect of at least one implant site. Multilevel, multivariable logistic regression models were applied to identify factors associated with moderate/severe peri-implantitis and buccal PISTD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 397 patients contacted, 146 were included (mean age 61.1 ± 14.5 years; current smokers 34.3%; stage III-IV periodontitis 65.1%) with a total of 511 dental implants (mean function time: 13.3 years [2-31]). Implant survival rate was 96.5%. Moderate/severe peri-implantitis was detected in 56.8% of patients and 34.7% of implants. Prevalence of buccal PISTD was 54.1% and 40.5%, respectively. Protective indicators for moderate/severe peri-implantitis included supportive peri-implant care > twice a year (OR = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.03-0.95), > 2 mm of keratinized tissue height (OR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.21-0.95), and correct mesio-distal implant positioning (OR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.32-0.94). Risk indicators included stage III-IV periodontitis (OR = 2.82; 95% CI: 1.30-6.15), function time ≥ 10 years (OR = 3.02; 95% CI: 1.55-5.89), bisphosphonate use during follow-up (OR = 5.96; 95% CI: 1.33-26.66), and presence of a cantilever (OR = 5.51; 95% CI: 1.56-19.38). For PISTD, protective indicators were mandibular location (OR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.25-0.81), thick buccal soft-tissue phenotype (OR = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.08-0.42), and > 2 mm of keratinized tissue height (OR = 0.05; 95% CI: 0.02-0.15). Risk indicators included peri-implantitis (OR = 2.21; 95% CI: 1.25-3.91), use of intermediate abutments (OR = 4.92; 95% CI: 1.92-12.58), and proximity to adjacent implants (OR = 3.35; 95% CI: 1.50-7.48) or edentulous spaces (OR = 3.38; 95% CI: 1.51-7.54).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this long-term, university-based cohort, peri-implant diseases and PISTD were highly prevalent. Multiple patient- and implant-level factors emerged as significant risk or protective indicators. Despite the widespread occurrence of peri-implant diseases, long-term implant survival remained high, challenging current diagnostic thresholds and underscoring the need for refined, progression-based definitions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16715,"journal":{"name":"Journal of periodontal research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of periodontal research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.70025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To assess the prevalence of peri-implant diseases and buccal peri-implant soft-tissue dehiscence (PISTD) and to identify the associated risk indicators.

Methods: Patients previously rehabilitated with implant-supported rehabilitations at the University of Turin Dental School were specifically recalled with a registry-based approach for this cross-sectional study. Data collection included medical and dental history, full-mouth clinical examination, and periapical radiographs. Moderate/severe peri-implantitis was diagnosed based on bone loss (direct criterion, when available) or bone level (indirect criterion) ≥ 2 mm and the presence of bleeding/suppuration. PISTD was defined as mucosal dehiscence on the buccal aspect of at least one implant site. Multilevel, multivariable logistic regression models were applied to identify factors associated with moderate/severe peri-implantitis and buccal PISTD.

Results: Of the 397 patients contacted, 146 were included (mean age 61.1 ± 14.5 years; current smokers 34.3%; stage III-IV periodontitis 65.1%) with a total of 511 dental implants (mean function time: 13.3 years [2-31]). Implant survival rate was 96.5%. Moderate/severe peri-implantitis was detected in 56.8% of patients and 34.7% of implants. Prevalence of buccal PISTD was 54.1% and 40.5%, respectively. Protective indicators for moderate/severe peri-implantitis included supportive peri-implant care > twice a year (OR = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.03-0.95), > 2 mm of keratinized tissue height (OR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.21-0.95), and correct mesio-distal implant positioning (OR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.32-0.94). Risk indicators included stage III-IV periodontitis (OR = 2.82; 95% CI: 1.30-6.15), function time ≥ 10 years (OR = 3.02; 95% CI: 1.55-5.89), bisphosphonate use during follow-up (OR = 5.96; 95% CI: 1.33-26.66), and presence of a cantilever (OR = 5.51; 95% CI: 1.56-19.38). For PISTD, protective indicators were mandibular location (OR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.25-0.81), thick buccal soft-tissue phenotype (OR = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.08-0.42), and > 2 mm of keratinized tissue height (OR = 0.05; 95% CI: 0.02-0.15). Risk indicators included peri-implantitis (OR = 2.21; 95% CI: 1.25-3.91), use of intermediate abutments (OR = 4.92; 95% CI: 1.92-12.58), and proximity to adjacent implants (OR = 3.35; 95% CI: 1.50-7.48) or edentulous spaces (OR = 3.38; 95% CI: 1.51-7.54).

Conclusion: In this long-term, university-based cohort, peri-implant diseases and PISTD were highly prevalent. Multiple patient- and implant-level factors emerged as significant risk or protective indicators. Despite the widespread occurrence of peri-implant diseases, long-term implant survival remained high, challenging current diagnostic thresholds and underscoring the need for refined, progression-based definitions.

种植体周围疾病和口腔软组织破裂的患病率和危险指标:一项基于大学队列的横断面研究。
目的:评估种植体周围疾病和颊种植体周围软组织开裂(PISTD)的患病率,并确定相关的危险指标。方法:采用基于注册表的方法,对在都灵大学牙科学院接受种植体支持康复治疗的患者进行横向研究。资料收集包括病史、口腔史、全口临床检查和根尖周x线片。中度/重度种植体周围炎的诊断基于骨丢失(直接标准,如果有)或骨水平(间接标准)≥2mm和存在出血/化脓。PISTD被定义为至少一个种植体部位的颊面粘膜开裂。应用多水平、多变量logistic回归模型来确定与中/重度种植体周围炎和颊部PISTD相关的因素。结果:397例患者中,纳入146例(平均年龄61.1±14.5岁;目前吸烟者34.3%;III-IV期牙周炎65.1%),共种植511颗牙(平均功能时间:13.3年[2-31])。种植体成活率为96.5%。56.8%的患者和34.7%的种植体中检出中度/重度种植体周围炎。颊部PISTD患病率分别为54.1%和40.5%。中度/重度种植体周围炎的保护性指标包括每年两次的支持性种植体周围护理> (OR = 0.16;95% CI: 0.03-0.95), 2 mm的角化组织高度(OR = 0.44;95% CI: 0.21-0.95),正确的中远端种植体定位(OR = 0.54;95% ci: 0.32-0.94)。危险指标包括III-IV期牙周炎(OR = 2.82;95% CI: 1.30-6.15),功能时间≥10年(OR = 3.02;95% CI: 1.55-5.89),随访期间使用双膦酸盐(OR = 5.96;95% CI: 1.33-26.66),且存在悬臂(OR = 5.51;95% ci: 1.56-19.38)。对于PISTD,保护指标为下颌位置(OR = 0.45;95% CI: 0.25-0.81),厚颊软组织表型(OR = 0.18;95% CI: 0.08-0.42),且角化组织高度为2 mm (OR = 0.05;95% ci: 0.02-0.15)。危险指标包括种植体周围炎(OR = 2.21;95% CI: 1.25-3.91),使用中间基台(OR = 4.92;95% CI: 1.92-12.58),临近种植体(OR = 3.35;95% CI: 1.50-7.48)或无牙间隙(or = 3.38;95% ci: 1.51-7.54)。结论:在这个以大学为基础的长期队列中,种植体周围疾病和PISTD非常普遍。多种患者和植入物水平的因素成为重要的风险或保护指标。尽管种植体周围疾病广泛发生,但长期种植体存活率仍然很高,这挑战了当前的诊断阈值,并强调需要精确的、基于进展的定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of periodontal research
Journal of periodontal research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Periodontal Research is an international research periodical the purpose of which is to publish original clinical and basic investigations and review articles concerned with every aspect of periodontology and related sciences. Brief communications (1-3 journal pages) are also accepted and a special effort is made to ensure their rapid publication. Reports of scientific meetings in periodontology and related fields are also published. One volume of six issues is published annually.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信