The long reach of Hermann J. Muller: How Muller influenced the development and content of secondary school biology curricula.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Edward J Calabrese, James Giordano, Lisa Green
{"title":"The long reach of Hermann J. Muller: How Muller influenced the development and content of secondary school biology curricula.","authors":"Edward J Calabrese, James Giordano, Lisa Green","doi":"10.1080/15459624.2025.2527979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Cold War provided incentive for radiation geneticists from the United States (U.S.) to offer guidance on scientific/public health issues. A notable case involved the U.S. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) recommendations concerning radiation-related heredity/cancer risk assessment, which have guided regulatory agencies from the 1950s to the present. A neglected, generally unknown, yet important strategic direction, involves influence exerted over the development of secondary school biological education programs in the U.S. With U.S. federal government funding, the American Institute for Biological Sciences (AIBS) led the development of a major revision of secondary school biological sciences' curricula, called the Biological Science Curriculum Study (BSCS), with the first education product widely adopted in 1963. The BSCS textbook content was directed by Arnold Grobman and Bentley Glass, leaders of the academic genetics community, especially those who participated in the Manhattan Project and the NAS Genetics Panel and how they engaged the involvement of the Nobel Laureate, Hermann Muller, to transform the actions of the BSCS committee to create an educational framework in which evolution was the overriding and integrative theme. Muller would ensure that the BSCS curriculum was based on the Dobzhansky rubric that \"Nothing in biology makes sense except in light of evolution.\" Muller also led these geneticists in a failed attempt to integrate \"reform\" eugenics principles and practices into the BSCS curriculum While Muller's influence on hereditary/cancer risk assessment has been extraordinary, his role in framing what biology students were taught, and how it would influence their concept of life, beliefs about humanity's place in the universe, and how humans could or should direct their evolution, has remained largely unknown.</p>","PeriodicalId":16599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2025.2527979","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Cold War provided incentive for radiation geneticists from the United States (U.S.) to offer guidance on scientific/public health issues. A notable case involved the U.S. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) recommendations concerning radiation-related heredity/cancer risk assessment, which have guided regulatory agencies from the 1950s to the present. A neglected, generally unknown, yet important strategic direction, involves influence exerted over the development of secondary school biological education programs in the U.S. With U.S. federal government funding, the American Institute for Biological Sciences (AIBS) led the development of a major revision of secondary school biological sciences' curricula, called the Biological Science Curriculum Study (BSCS), with the first education product widely adopted in 1963. The BSCS textbook content was directed by Arnold Grobman and Bentley Glass, leaders of the academic genetics community, especially those who participated in the Manhattan Project and the NAS Genetics Panel and how they engaged the involvement of the Nobel Laureate, Hermann Muller, to transform the actions of the BSCS committee to create an educational framework in which evolution was the overriding and integrative theme. Muller would ensure that the BSCS curriculum was based on the Dobzhansky rubric that "Nothing in biology makes sense except in light of evolution." Muller also led these geneticists in a failed attempt to integrate "reform" eugenics principles and practices into the BSCS curriculum While Muller's influence on hereditary/cancer risk assessment has been extraordinary, his role in framing what biology students were taught, and how it would influence their concept of life, beliefs about humanity's place in the universe, and how humans could or should direct their evolution, has remained largely unknown.

赫尔曼·穆勒的深远影响:穆勒如何影响中学生物课程的发展和内容。
冷战促使美国的辐射遗传学家在科学/公共卫生问题上提供指导。一个值得注意的案例涉及美国国家科学院(NAS)关于辐射相关遗传/癌症风险评估的建议,该建议从20世纪50年代至今一直指导着监管机构。在美国联邦政府的资助下,美国生物科学研究所(AIBS)领导了对中学生物科学课程的重大修订,称为生物科学课程研究(BSCS), 1963年第一个教育产品被广泛采用,这是一个被忽视的,通常不为人知的,但重要的战略方向。BSCS教科书的内容是由Arnold Grobman和Bentley Glass指导的,他们是学术遗传学社区的领导者,特别是那些参与曼哈顿计划和NAS遗传学小组的人,以及他们如何参与诺贝尔奖获得者Hermann Muller的参与,以改变BSCS委员会的行动,创建一个教育框架,其中进化是压倒一切的综合主题。穆勒将确保BSCS的课程建立在多布赞斯基(Dobzhansky)原则的基础上,即“生物学中没有任何东西是有意义的,除非从进化的角度出发”。穆勒还带领这些遗传学家尝试将“改革”优生学原则和实践整合到BSCS课程中,但失败了。尽管穆勒对遗传/癌症风险评估的影响非同寻常,但他在构建生物学学生的教学内容方面所起的作用,以及这将如何影响他们对生命的概念,对人类在宇宙中的地位的信念,以及人类如何或应该如何指导自己的进化,在很大程度上仍然未知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene ( JOEH ) is a joint publication of the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA®) and ACGIH®. The JOEH is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to enhancing the knowledge and practice of occupational and environmental hygiene and safety by widely disseminating research articles and applied studies of the highest quality. The JOEH provides a written medium for the communication of ideas, methods, processes, and research in core and emerging areas of occupational and environmental hygiene. Core domains include, but are not limited to: exposure assessment, control strategies, ergonomics, and risk analysis. Emerging domains include, but are not limited to: sensor technology, emergency preparedness and response, changing workforce, and management and analysis of "big" data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信