A comparison of drugs targeting the renin-angiotensin system and global cognition in aging.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-06 DOI:10.1177/13872877251365541
Claudene J George, Kay Thwe Kyaw, Charles B Hall, Erica F Weiss, Joe Verghese, Peter Abadir
{"title":"A comparison of drugs targeting the renin-angiotensin system and global cognition in aging.","authors":"Claudene J George, Kay Thwe Kyaw, Charles B Hall, Erica F Weiss, Joe Verghese, Peter Abadir","doi":"10.1177/13872877251365541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundHypertension (HTN) is a major risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) medications, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), have been proposed to mitigate cognitive decline, but evidence remains inconsistent.ObjectiveCompare global cognition over time among ARB, ACEI, and non-RAS drug users.MethodsData from the Rush Memory and Aging Project (1997-2006) included 2019 participants. Global cognition was assessed using a composite z-score of 19 cognitive tests. Participants were categorized by medication use: ARB, ACEI, or non-RAS. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed to compare cognitive outcomes over 9 years, adjusting for baseline cognition, social determinants, and medical factors. Subgroup analyses evaluated cognitive domains and the impact of HTN.ResultsAt baseline, ARB and ACEI users had more vascular risk factors and medical conditions than non-RAS users. At 9 years, ARB users had slightly better global cognitive outcomes compared to ACEI (LS-mean difference: 0.015, 95% CI [-0.175, 0.205]) and non-RAS users (LS-mean difference: 0.06, 95% CI [-0.11, 0.23]), though differences were not statistically significant. ACEI users showed significant improvement in working memory compared to non-RAS users (LS-mean: 0.157, 95% CI [0.002, 0.313]). Among participants without HTN, ACEI use was associated with significantly reduced cognitive decline compared to non-RAS use.ConclusionsARBs may benefit global cognitive function, while ACEIs may yield improvements in specific domains like working memory. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore the impact of drug characteristics such as blood-brain-barrier penetration.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"1200-1208"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251365541","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundHypertension (HTN) is a major risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) medications, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), have been proposed to mitigate cognitive decline, but evidence remains inconsistent.ObjectiveCompare global cognition over time among ARB, ACEI, and non-RAS drug users.MethodsData from the Rush Memory and Aging Project (1997-2006) included 2019 participants. Global cognition was assessed using a composite z-score of 19 cognitive tests. Participants were categorized by medication use: ARB, ACEI, or non-RAS. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed to compare cognitive outcomes over 9 years, adjusting for baseline cognition, social determinants, and medical factors. Subgroup analyses evaluated cognitive domains and the impact of HTN.ResultsAt baseline, ARB and ACEI users had more vascular risk factors and medical conditions than non-RAS users. At 9 years, ARB users had slightly better global cognitive outcomes compared to ACEI (LS-mean difference: 0.015, 95% CI [-0.175, 0.205]) and non-RAS users (LS-mean difference: 0.06, 95% CI [-0.11, 0.23]), though differences were not statistically significant. ACEI users showed significant improvement in working memory compared to non-RAS users (LS-mean: 0.157, 95% CI [0.002, 0.313]). Among participants without HTN, ACEI use was associated with significantly reduced cognitive decline compared to non-RAS use.ConclusionsARBs may benefit global cognitive function, while ACEIs may yield improvements in specific domains like working memory. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore the impact of drug characteristics such as blood-brain-barrier penetration.

针对肾素-血管紧张素系统与衰老整体认知的药物比较。
背景:高血压(HTN)是阿尔茨海默病(AD)及相关痴呆的主要危险因素。肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)药物,包括血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)和血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARBs),被认为可以减轻认知能力下降,但证据仍然不一致。目的比较ARB、ACEI和非ras吸毒者的全球认知能力随时间的变化。方法数据来自Rush记忆与衰老项目(1997-2006),包括2019名参与者。使用19项认知测试的复合z分数评估全局认知。参与者按药物使用分类:ARB、ACEI或非ras。采用协方差分析(ANCOVA)比较9年以上的认知结果,调整基线认知、社会决定因素和医疗因素。亚组分析评估认知领域和HTN的影响。结果基线时,ARB和ACEI使用者比非ras使用者有更多的血管危险因素和医疗状况。在9年时,ARB使用者的整体认知结果略好于ACEI (ls -平均差异:0.015,95% CI[-0.175, 0.205])和非ras使用者(ls -平均差异:0.06,95% CI[-0.11, 0.23]),但差异无统计学意义。与非ras使用者相比,ACEI使用者在工作记忆方面有显著改善(LS-mean: 0.157, 95% CI[0.002, 0.313])。在没有HTN的参与者中,与没有使用ras的参与者相比,使用ACEI与显著减少认知能力下降有关。结论sarb可能改善整体认知功能,而ACEIs可能改善工作记忆等特定领域。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现,并探索药物特性(如血脑屏障渗透)的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信