Diagnostic accuracy of Neer's impingement test for subacromial shoulder impingement.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Clevio Desouza, Chiranjivi Jani
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of Neer's impingement test for subacromial shoulder impingement.","authors":"Clevio Desouza, Chiranjivi Jani","doi":"10.1007/s11845-025-04058-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) is one of the most common causes of shoulder pain, encompassing a spectrum of conditions ranging from bursitis to partial or complete rotator cuff tears. The Neer's impingement test is frequently used for clinical diagnosis, yet its accuracy remains debated. This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, Positive predictive value (PPV), Negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy of Neer's test against Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study was conducted on 500 shoulders at a tertiary care centre. Patients presenting with unilateral or bilateral shoulder pain of at least three weeks duration underwent clinical evaluation using Neer's sign and Neer's test. Those with a positive Neer's sign were included and underwent subacromial lignocaine injection, followed by reassessment. All patients underwent MRI, and the results were compared. Diagnostic parameters including sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population had a mean age of 46.3 years with a male-to-female ratio of 2:1. MRI confirmed SIS in 81% of cases. Neer's test demonstrated a sensitivity of 79.0%, specificity of 63.2%, PPV of 90.1%, NPV of 41.4%, and diagnostic accuracy of 76.0%. Diagnostic accuracy was higher in rotator cuff pathologies (81.6%) compared to subacromial bursitis (70.4%). The test showed greater sensitivity (90%) for partial supraspinatus tears, but lower specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neer's test is a reliable, sensitive tool for diagnosing SIS, particularly in partial rotator cuff tears. However, its specificity remains moderate, warranting cautious interpretation alongside imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-04058-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) is one of the most common causes of shoulder pain, encompassing a spectrum of conditions ranging from bursitis to partial or complete rotator cuff tears. The Neer's impingement test is frequently used for clinical diagnosis, yet its accuracy remains debated. This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, Positive predictive value (PPV), Negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy of Neer's test against Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the gold standard.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 500 shoulders at a tertiary care centre. Patients presenting with unilateral or bilateral shoulder pain of at least three weeks duration underwent clinical evaluation using Neer's sign and Neer's test. Those with a positive Neer's sign were included and underwent subacromial lignocaine injection, followed by reassessment. All patients underwent MRI, and the results were compared. Diagnostic parameters including sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated.

Results: The study population had a mean age of 46.3 years with a male-to-female ratio of 2:1. MRI confirmed SIS in 81% of cases. Neer's test demonstrated a sensitivity of 79.0%, specificity of 63.2%, PPV of 90.1%, NPV of 41.4%, and diagnostic accuracy of 76.0%. Diagnostic accuracy was higher in rotator cuff pathologies (81.6%) compared to subacromial bursitis (70.4%). The test showed greater sensitivity (90%) for partial supraspinatus tears, but lower specificity.

Conclusion: Neer's test is a reliable, sensitive tool for diagnosing SIS, particularly in partial rotator cuff tears. However, its specificity remains moderate, warranting cautious interpretation alongside imaging.

肩峰下撞击试验诊断肩撞击的准确性。
背景:肩峰下撞击综合征(SIS)是肩痛最常见的原因之一,包括一系列的情况,从滑囊炎到部分或完全的肩袖撕裂。诺氏撞击试验常用于临床诊断,但其准确性仍有争议。本研究旨在评价Neer试验相对于磁共振成像(MRI)作为金标准的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(Positive predictive value, PPV)、阴性预测值(Negative predictive value, NPV)和诊断准确性。方法:对一家三级保健中心的500名肩部患者进行前瞻性研究。患者表现为单侧或双侧肩痛,持续时间至少三周,采用Neer体征和Neer试验进行临床评估。纳入阴性阳性体征者,接受肩峰下利多卡因注射,然后重新评估。所有患者均行MRI检查,并对结果进行比较。计算诊断参数包括敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV和诊断准确性。结果:研究人群平均年龄为46.3岁,男女比例为2:1。MRI证实81%的病例为SIS。Neer试验的敏感性为79.0%,特异性为63.2%,PPV为90.1%,NPV为41.4%,诊断准确率为76.0%。肩袖病变的诊断准确率(81.6%)高于肩峰下滑囊炎(70.4%)。该检测对部分冈上肌撕裂有较高的敏感性(90%),但特异性较低。结论:Neer's试验是一种可靠、灵敏的诊断SIS的工具,特别是在部分肩袖撕裂时。然而,其特异性仍然中等,需要谨慎的解释和影像学检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信