Unilateral Stimulation of the Dorsolateral Striatum Attenuates Goal-Directed Action.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Genevra Hart, Billy Chieng, Bernard W Balleine
{"title":"Unilateral Stimulation of the Dorsolateral Striatum Attenuates Goal-Directed Action.","authors":"Genevra Hart, Billy Chieng, Bernard W Balleine","doi":"10.1111/ejn.70175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It has long been known that the dorsomedial (DMS) and dorsolateral striatum (DLS) mediate distinct forms of action control, with DMS mediating goal-directed actions and DLS mediating habits. Recent evidence suggests that, in accord with its role in goal-directed control, unilateral stimulation of dorsomedial striatum (DMS) enhances actions contralateral to the stimulation in a manner that scales with the prior reward history of that action. In the current study, we assessed whether the effects of unilateral stimulation of the dorsolateral striatum (DLS) induce a response bias that reflects enhanced habitual control, as measured by the effect of stimulation on ongoing goal-directed control. Rats were first trained to press two levers for distinct outcomes in a manner likely to induce goal-directed control of these actions. We then assessed the effects of unilateral hM3D DREADDs-induced stimulation of the DMS or DLS, applied during an outcome devaluation choice test and outcome-mediated reinstatement, both known to depend on DMS activity. DMS stimulation had no impact on the choice of either the action ipsilateral or contralateral to the stimulation, either during devaluation or reinstatement. In contrast, stimulation of the DLS abolished goal-directed control in both tests, reducing sensitivity to outcome devaluation both on the ipsilateral and contralateral lever. In addition, stimulation both attenuated reinstatement and induced a response bias away from the contralateral lever during reinstated responding. These data suggest that, rather than driving motor output per se, the DLS is important for selecting motor programs triggered by stimulus-response associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"62 3","pages":"e70175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.70175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It has long been known that the dorsomedial (DMS) and dorsolateral striatum (DLS) mediate distinct forms of action control, with DMS mediating goal-directed actions and DLS mediating habits. Recent evidence suggests that, in accord with its role in goal-directed control, unilateral stimulation of dorsomedial striatum (DMS) enhances actions contralateral to the stimulation in a manner that scales with the prior reward history of that action. In the current study, we assessed whether the effects of unilateral stimulation of the dorsolateral striatum (DLS) induce a response bias that reflects enhanced habitual control, as measured by the effect of stimulation on ongoing goal-directed control. Rats were first trained to press two levers for distinct outcomes in a manner likely to induce goal-directed control of these actions. We then assessed the effects of unilateral hM3D DREADDs-induced stimulation of the DMS or DLS, applied during an outcome devaluation choice test and outcome-mediated reinstatement, both known to depend on DMS activity. DMS stimulation had no impact on the choice of either the action ipsilateral or contralateral to the stimulation, either during devaluation or reinstatement. In contrast, stimulation of the DLS abolished goal-directed control in both tests, reducing sensitivity to outcome devaluation both on the ipsilateral and contralateral lever. In addition, stimulation both attenuated reinstatement and induced a response bias away from the contralateral lever during reinstated responding. These data suggest that, rather than driving motor output per se, the DLS is important for selecting motor programs triggered by stimulus-response associations.

单侧刺激背侧纹状体减弱目标导向作用。
人们早就知道背内侧纹状体(DMS)和背外侧纹状体(DLS)介导不同形式的动作控制,其中DMS介导目标导向的动作,DLS介导习惯。最近的证据表明,与其在目标导向控制中的作用一致,单侧刺激背内侧纹状体(DMS)以一种与该刺激的先前奖励历史相匹配的方式增强对侧的行为。在当前的研究中,我们评估了单侧刺激背外侧纹状体(DLS)是否会引起反应偏差,这种反应偏差反映了习惯性控制的增强,通过刺激对持续目标导向控制的影响来衡量。老鼠首先被训练按两个杠杆来获得不同的结果,以一种可能诱导这些行为的目标导向控制的方式。然后,我们评估了单侧hM3D恐惧刺激对DMS或DLS的影响,应用于结果贬值选择测试和结果介导的恢复,两者都依赖于DMS活性。DMS刺激对刺激的同侧或对侧行为的选择没有影响,无论是贬值还是恢复。相比之下,刺激DLS在两个测试中都取消了目标导向控制,降低了对同侧和对侧杠杆上结果贬值的敏感性。此外,在恢复反应期间,刺激既减弱了恢复,又诱导了远离对侧杠杆的反应偏倚。这些数据表明,DLS对选择由刺激-反应关联触发的运动程序很重要,而不是驱动运动输出本身。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Neuroscience
European Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
305
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: EJN is the journal of FENS and supports the international neuroscientific community by publishing original high quality research articles and reviews in all fields of neuroscience. In addition, to engage with issues that are of interest to the science community, we also publish Editorials, Meetings Reports and Neuro-Opinions on topics that are of current interest in the fields of neuroscience research and training in science. We have recently established a series of ‘Profiles of Women in Neuroscience’. Our goal is to provide a vehicle for publications that further the understanding of the structure and function of the nervous system in both health and disease and to provide a vehicle to engage the neuroscience community. As the official journal of FENS, profits from the journal are re-invested in the neuroscientific community through the activities of FENS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信