Flap size as a confounding variable in flap perfusion measurement with the Oxygen-to-see (O2C) analysis system in microvascular head and neck reconstruction - a retrospective analysis.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mark Ooms, Philipp Winnand, Marius Heitzer, Anna Bock, Marie Sophie Katz, Johannes Bickenbach, Frank Hölzle, Ali Modabber
{"title":"Flap size as a confounding variable in flap perfusion measurement with the Oxygen-to-see (O2C) analysis system in microvascular head and neck reconstruction - a retrospective analysis.","authors":"Mark Ooms, Philipp Winnand, Marius Heitzer, Anna Bock, Marie Sophie Katz, Johannes Bickenbach, Frank Hölzle, Ali Modabber","doi":"10.1007/s00784-025-06468-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Oxygen-to-see (O2C) analysis system is used for flap monitoring based on predefined threshold values for flap perfusion. However, flap size may be a confounding variable. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between flap size and flap perfusion in microvascular head and neck reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Flap perfusion values measured with the O2C analysis system between 2011 and 2020 in 252 patients undergoing microvascular head and neck reconstruction with a radial free forearm flap (RFFF) or anterolateral thigh flap (ALTF) were retrospectively analyzed. Intraoperative and postoperative flap blood flow, hemoglobin concentration, and hemoglobin oxygen saturation at 8- and 2-mm tissue depths were compared between small (≤ median flap size) and large flaps (> median flap size) for RFFFs and ALTFs separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative and postoperative hemoglobin concentration at a 2-mm tissue depth differed between small and large ALTFs (65.0 arbitrary units [AU] vs. 51.0 AU, p = 0.007; and 51.5 AU vs. 39.0 AU, p = 0.019). Both differences persisted in multivariable analysis (p < 0.001 and p = 0.012). Other differences were not observed or did not persist in multivariable analysis for RFFFs and ALTFs (all p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Microvascular free flap perfusion is not related to flap size in terms of flap blood flow and hemoglobin oxygen saturation. This underscores the validity of predefined absolute threshold values in the context of flap monitoring based on perfusion measurement with the O2C analysis system.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Flap perfusion measurement with the Oxygen-to-see (O2C) analysis system can be used for flap monitoring of small and large flaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 9","pages":"400"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331801/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06468-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The Oxygen-to-see (O2C) analysis system is used for flap monitoring based on predefined threshold values for flap perfusion. However, flap size may be a confounding variable. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between flap size and flap perfusion in microvascular head and neck reconstruction.

Materials and methods: Flap perfusion values measured with the O2C analysis system between 2011 and 2020 in 252 patients undergoing microvascular head and neck reconstruction with a radial free forearm flap (RFFF) or anterolateral thigh flap (ALTF) were retrospectively analyzed. Intraoperative and postoperative flap blood flow, hemoglobin concentration, and hemoglobin oxygen saturation at 8- and 2-mm tissue depths were compared between small (≤ median flap size) and large flaps (> median flap size) for RFFFs and ALTFs separately.

Results: Intraoperative and postoperative hemoglobin concentration at a 2-mm tissue depth differed between small and large ALTFs (65.0 arbitrary units [AU] vs. 51.0 AU, p = 0.007; and 51.5 AU vs. 39.0 AU, p = 0.019). Both differences persisted in multivariable analysis (p < 0.001 and p = 0.012). Other differences were not observed or did not persist in multivariable analysis for RFFFs and ALTFs (all p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Microvascular free flap perfusion is not related to flap size in terms of flap blood flow and hemoglobin oxygen saturation. This underscores the validity of predefined absolute threshold values in the context of flap monitoring based on perfusion measurement with the O2C analysis system.

Clinical relevance: Flap perfusion measurement with the Oxygen-to-see (O2C) analysis system can be used for flap monitoring of small and large flaps.

Abstract Image

在微血管头颈部重建中使用氧-视(O2C)分析系统测量皮瓣灌注时,皮瓣大小作为混杂变量的回顾性分析。
目的:基于预定义的皮瓣灌注阈值,将氧-视(O2C)分析系统用于皮瓣监测。然而,皮瓣大小可能是一个混杂变量。本研究旨在探讨微血管头颈部重建中皮瓣大小与皮瓣灌注的关系。材料与方法:回顾性分析2011 - 2020年252例桡骨游离前臂皮瓣(RFFF)或大腿前外侧皮瓣(ALTF)行微血管头颈部重建患者的O2C分析系统皮瓣灌注值。分别比较小瓣(≤皮瓣中位尺寸)和大瓣(皮瓣中位尺寸为>)在RFFFs和ALTFs的术中、术后皮瓣血流、血红蛋白浓度和血红蛋白氧饱和度在8和2 mm组织深度。结果:小ALTFs和大ALTFs术中和术后2 mm组织深度血红蛋白浓度存在差异(65.0任意单位[AU] vs. 51.0 AU, p = 0.007;51.5 AU对39.0 AU, p = 0.019)。在多变量分析中,这两种差异仍然存在(p 0.05)。结论:微血管游离皮瓣血流灌注与皮瓣大小无关,与皮瓣血流量及血红蛋白氧饱和度无关。这强调了预定义的绝对阈值在基于O2C分析系统的血流灌注测量皮瓣监测背景下的有效性。临床意义:O2C (Oxygen-to-see)分析系统的皮瓣灌注测量可用于大小皮瓣的皮瓣监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信