QIing your QI: a 13-year experience of a paediatric residency QI programme.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Adolfo Leonel Molina, Michele K Nichols, Colm P Travers, Stephanie Berger, Emily A Smitherman, David P Galloway, Rachel Kassel, Samuel Gentle, Andrea Kennedy, Chang L Wu, Susan Walley
{"title":"QIing your QI: a 13-year experience of a paediatric residency QI programme.","authors":"Adolfo Leonel Molina, Michele K Nichols, Colm P Travers, Stephanie Berger, Emily A Smitherman, David P Galloway, Rachel Kassel, Samuel Gentle, Andrea Kennedy, Chang L Wu, Susan Walley","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>QI education is essential for resident physicians with established requirements from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education outlining the necessary components. Literature supports the inclusion of both didactic and experiential learning, however, most studies review knowledge and attitude based assessments of residency QI programs. In 2012, our pediatric residency program identified a gap in resident engagement in QI, which led to the formalization of a QI education program grounded in the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Model for improvement with objective measures of QI projects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over 13 years, our program implemented interative interventions across three phases to enchance QI training. Initial core interventions involved the structure of didactics to teach core principles of QI and with time focusing on more individualized mentorship. Our efforts were guided through a residency QI committee. Our aim was to (1) increase the percentage of resident QI projects with SMART aims, and (2) increase the use of QI graphs (run charts and SPC charts) of resident QI projects. We tracked graduating resident exit survey satisfaction with the QI program as a balancing measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2012 through 2025, over 300 resident completed 390 QI projects that were reviewed. The percentage of of projects with SMART aims and QI graphs increased over time. The percentage of projects applying for American Board of Pediatrics Part IV applications and presenting at conferences also increased. Resident satisfaction remained with with an average \"Poor\" rating of only 2.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using the model for improvement to assess objective measures in a residency QI program is both feasible and effective. This 13-year intiative demonstrates how systematic, iterative improvement can improve the rigor of resident QI projects. Future goals including leveraging informatics to further support residents with their projects and track downstream patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018715","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: QI education is essential for resident physicians with established requirements from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education outlining the necessary components. Literature supports the inclusion of both didactic and experiential learning, however, most studies review knowledge and attitude based assessments of residency QI programs. In 2012, our pediatric residency program identified a gap in resident engagement in QI, which led to the formalization of a QI education program grounded in the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Model for improvement with objective measures of QI projects.

Methods: Over 13 years, our program implemented interative interventions across three phases to enchance QI training. Initial core interventions involved the structure of didactics to teach core principles of QI and with time focusing on more individualized mentorship. Our efforts were guided through a residency QI committee. Our aim was to (1) increase the percentage of resident QI projects with SMART aims, and (2) increase the use of QI graphs (run charts and SPC charts) of resident QI projects. We tracked graduating resident exit survey satisfaction with the QI program as a balancing measure.

Results: From 2012 through 2025, over 300 resident completed 390 QI projects that were reviewed. The percentage of of projects with SMART aims and QI graphs increased over time. The percentage of projects applying for American Board of Pediatrics Part IV applications and presenting at conferences also increased. Resident satisfaction remained with with an average "Poor" rating of only 2.6%.

Conclusions: Using the model for improvement to assess objective measures in a residency QI program is both feasible and effective. This 13-year intiative demonstrates how systematic, iterative improvement can improve the rigor of resident QI projects. Future goals including leveraging informatics to further support residents with their projects and track downstream patient outcomes.

净化你的QI:一个13年的儿科住院医师QI项目的经验。
导读:QI教育对于住院医师来说是必不可少的,研究生医学教育认证委员会制定了必要的组成部分。文献支持包括教学和体验式学习,然而,大多数研究回顾了基于知识和态度的住院医师QI项目评估。2012年,我们的儿科住院医师项目发现了住院医师参与QI的差距,这导致了基于医疗保健改善研究所(IHI)模型的QI教育计划的正规化,该模型旨在通过QI项目的客观测量进行改进。方法:在过去的13年里,我们的项目实施了三个阶段的互动干预,以加强QI训练。最初的核心干预措施涉及教学结构,以教授QI的核心原则,并随着时间的推移侧重于更个性化的指导。我们的工作是通过一个住院医师QI委员会来指导的。我们的目标是(1)提高具有SMART目标的居民QI项目的百分比,以及(2)增加居民QI项目的QI图表(运行图和SPC图)的使用。我们跟踪毕业居民退出调查满意度与QI计划作为一个平衡措施。结果:从2012年到2025年,300多名居民完成了390个QI项目。具有SMART目标和QI图的项目百分比随着时间的推移而增加。申请美国儿科委员会第四部分申请和在会议上发表的项目百分比也有所增加。居民满意度保持在“差”的平均水平,仅为2.6%。结论:使用改进模型来评估住院医师质量评价项目的客观措施是可行和有效的。这个为期13年的计划展示了系统的、迭代的改进如何能够提高常驻QI项目的严谨性。未来的目标包括利用信息学来进一步支持住院医生的项目,并跟踪下游患者的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信