Identifying distinct clusters of ICU survivors by integrating demographic, pre-admission quality of life, and clinical data: a large prospective cohort study.
Lucy L Porter,Lotte Hazeleger,Kirsten Bos,Koen S Simons,Johannes G van der Hoeven,Melda Yeghaian,Margaretha C E van der Woude,Susanne van Santen,Thijs C D Rettig,Marijke de Vries,Mark van den Boogaard,Marieke Zegers
{"title":"Identifying distinct clusters of ICU survivors by integrating demographic, pre-admission quality of life, and clinical data: a large prospective cohort study.","authors":"Lucy L Porter,Lotte Hazeleger,Kirsten Bos,Koen S Simons,Johannes G van der Hoeven,Melda Yeghaian,Margaretha C E van der Woude,Susanne van Santen,Thijs C D Rettig,Marijke de Vries,Mark van den Boogaard,Marieke Zegers","doi":"10.1007/s00134-025-08052-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nICU patients differ in pre-ICU health status, comorbidities, and diagnosis, forming a heterogeneous population with diverse long-term outcomes. This study explored whether clustering ICU patients by demographic, pre-admission quality of life, and clinical data, rather than by diagnosis, could identify subgroups that are more informative for patient-centered outcomes post-ICU.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nData from the MONITOR-IC prospective cohort study were used. Demographic, pre-admission quality of life, and clinical data from 2361 adult ICU survivors of six hospitals were used to identify clusters, using the k-prototypes algorithm. Data from five additional hospitals (n = 866) were used for external validation. Self-reported physical, mental, and cognitive functioning, and quality of life one year post-ICU were described.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe four identified clusters differed significantly in long-term physical, mental, and cognitive functioning, and quality of life. Cluster-A (n = 204), characterized by a healthy pre-ICU status, high disease severity, low Glasgow Coma Scale, and long ICU stay, had a relatively high quality of life at one year, despite experiencing a mean decline from baseline. Cluster-B (n = 877), also a healthy group before admission but less severely ill at ICU admission, reported the best outcomes. Cluster-C (n = 632) included younger, mostly female patients with moderate impairments both pre- and one-year post-ICU. Cluster-D (n = 648), characterized by a low education level and poor baseline health, reported impaired outcomes one year post-ICU, although improved compared to their pre-admission status. External validation confirmed the generalizability of these results.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThis study identified and externally validated four distinct clusters of ICU patients by integrating both clinical and non-clinical data. These clusters, which differed in long-term physical, mental, and cognitive outcomes, challenge conventional disease-based classification, and support a multidimensional approach to define subgroups of ICU patients.\r\n\r\nTRIAL REGISTRATION\r\nThe MONITOR-IC study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03246334.","PeriodicalId":13665,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-025-08052-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PURPOSE
ICU patients differ in pre-ICU health status, comorbidities, and diagnosis, forming a heterogeneous population with diverse long-term outcomes. This study explored whether clustering ICU patients by demographic, pre-admission quality of life, and clinical data, rather than by diagnosis, could identify subgroups that are more informative for patient-centered outcomes post-ICU.
METHODS
Data from the MONITOR-IC prospective cohort study were used. Demographic, pre-admission quality of life, and clinical data from 2361 adult ICU survivors of six hospitals were used to identify clusters, using the k-prototypes algorithm. Data from five additional hospitals (n = 866) were used for external validation. Self-reported physical, mental, and cognitive functioning, and quality of life one year post-ICU were described.
RESULTS
The four identified clusters differed significantly in long-term physical, mental, and cognitive functioning, and quality of life. Cluster-A (n = 204), characterized by a healthy pre-ICU status, high disease severity, low Glasgow Coma Scale, and long ICU stay, had a relatively high quality of life at one year, despite experiencing a mean decline from baseline. Cluster-B (n = 877), also a healthy group before admission but less severely ill at ICU admission, reported the best outcomes. Cluster-C (n = 632) included younger, mostly female patients with moderate impairments both pre- and one-year post-ICU. Cluster-D (n = 648), characterized by a low education level and poor baseline health, reported impaired outcomes one year post-ICU, although improved compared to their pre-admission status. External validation confirmed the generalizability of these results.
CONCLUSION
This study identified and externally validated four distinct clusters of ICU patients by integrating both clinical and non-clinical data. These clusters, which differed in long-term physical, mental, and cognitive outcomes, challenge conventional disease-based classification, and support a multidimensional approach to define subgroups of ICU patients.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
The MONITOR-IC study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03246334.
期刊介绍:
Intensive Care Medicine is the premier publication platform fostering the communication and exchange of cutting-edge research and ideas within the field of intensive care medicine on a comprehensive scale. Catering to professionals involved in intensive medical care, including intensivists, medical specialists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals, ICM stands as the official journal of The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. ICM is dedicated to advancing the understanding and practice of intensive care medicine among professionals in Europe and beyond. The journal provides a robust platform for disseminating current research findings and innovative ideas in intensive care medicine. Content published in Intensive Care Medicine encompasses a wide range, including review articles, original research papers, letters, reviews, debates, and more.