Excess Mortality and Containment Performance During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence From 34 Countries.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Chieh Cheng,Hsiao-Yu Wu,Shu-Chen Kuo,Brandon Fan,Ya-Ting Hsu,Yi-Kai Chen,Byron Fan,Yung-An Jang,Chih-Fan Hung,Wei-Ming Jiang,Hung-Yi Chiou,Wei J Chen,Hsiao-Hui Tsou
{"title":"Excess Mortality and Containment Performance During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence From 34 Countries.","authors":"Chieh Cheng,Hsiao-Yu Wu,Shu-Chen Kuo,Brandon Fan,Ya-Ting Hsu,Yi-Kai Chen,Byron Fan,Yung-An Jang,Chih-Fan Hung,Wei-Ming Jiang,Hung-Yi Chiou,Wei J Chen,Hsiao-Hui Tsou","doi":"10.2105/ajph.2025.308136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives. To expand COVID-19 containment indicators to evaluate the relationship between excess mortality and government response. Methods. We developed a longitudinal study analyzing excess mortality, COVID-19 containment, and structural conditions in 34 countries between 2020 and 2022. Results. The average excess mortality ratios of the 34 countries were 1.09, 1.14, and 1.11 in 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively. Thirteen countries experienced continuous annual rises, while only 2 had consistent annual declines. Top-performing countries significantly reduced excess deaths by 5.7% (b = -0.06; 95% CI [confidence interval] = -0.10, -0.01; P = .02) in 2020 and 12.9% (b = -0.13; 95% CI = -0.17, -0.08; P < .001) in 2021, compared to bottom performers. Middle-performing countries saw reductions of 6.7% (b = -0.07; 95% CI = -0.11, -0.02; P = .01) and 10.6% (b = -0.11; 95% CI = -0.15, -0.06; P < .001). These findings suggest that better containment is associated with fewer excess deaths, even after accounting for preexisting structural differences. Conclusions. The COVID-19 containment indicators' precision emphasizes the association between better containment and lower excess mortality during early and postvaccine development periods. Public Health Implications. Our findings urge governments to utilize new metrics that balance flexibility and strictness for pandemic strategies, informing future policy interventions. (Am J Public Health. 2025;115(9):1518-1528. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308136).","PeriodicalId":7647,"journal":{"name":"American journal of public health","volume":"15 1","pages":"1518-1528"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2025.308136","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. To expand COVID-19 containment indicators to evaluate the relationship between excess mortality and government response. Methods. We developed a longitudinal study analyzing excess mortality, COVID-19 containment, and structural conditions in 34 countries between 2020 and 2022. Results. The average excess mortality ratios of the 34 countries were 1.09, 1.14, and 1.11 in 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively. Thirteen countries experienced continuous annual rises, while only 2 had consistent annual declines. Top-performing countries significantly reduced excess deaths by 5.7% (b = -0.06; 95% CI [confidence interval] = -0.10, -0.01; P = .02) in 2020 and 12.9% (b = -0.13; 95% CI = -0.17, -0.08; P < .001) in 2021, compared to bottom performers. Middle-performing countries saw reductions of 6.7% (b = -0.07; 95% CI = -0.11, -0.02; P = .01) and 10.6% (b = -0.11; 95% CI = -0.15, -0.06; P < .001). These findings suggest that better containment is associated with fewer excess deaths, even after accounting for preexisting structural differences. Conclusions. The COVID-19 containment indicators' precision emphasizes the association between better containment and lower excess mortality during early and postvaccine development periods. Public Health Implications. Our findings urge governments to utilize new metrics that balance flexibility and strictness for pandemic strategies, informing future policy interventions. (Am J Public Health. 2025;115(9):1518-1528. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308136).
COVID-19大流行期间的超额死亡率和控制绩效:来自34个国家的证据。
目标。扩大COVID-19遏制指标,以评估超额死亡率与政府应对措施之间的关系。方法。我们开展了一项纵向研究,分析了2020年至2022年间34个国家的超额死亡率、COVID-19防控和结构状况。结果。2020年、2021年和2022年,34个国家的平均超额死亡率分别为1.09、1.14和1.11。13个国家经历了连续的年度增长,而只有2个国家持续的年度下降。表现最好的国家将超额死亡人数显著减少了5.7% (b = -0.06;95% CI[置信区间]= -0.10,-0.01;P = 0.02)和12.9% (b = -0.13;95% ci = -0.17, -0.08;P < 0.001)。表现中等的国家减少了6.7% (b = -0.07;95% ci = -0.11, -0.02;P = 0.01)和10.6% (b = -0.11;95% ci = -0.15, -0.06;p < 0.001)。这些发现表明,即使考虑到先前存在的结构差异,更好的遏制措施也与更少的超额死亡有关。结论。COVID-19遏制指标的准确性强调了在疫苗开发早期和后期,更好的遏制与较低的超额死亡率之间的关联。公共卫生影响。我们的研究结果敦促各国政府利用新的衡量标准来平衡大流行战略的灵活性和严谨性,为未来的政策干预提供信息。[J] .公共卫生,2025;115(9):1518-1528。https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308136)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of public health
American journal of public health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1109
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Public Health (AJPH) is dedicated to publishing original work in research, research methods, and program evaluation within the field of public health. The journal's mission is to advance public health research, policy, practice, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信