Digitizing Olfactory Assessment in Portugal: Pilot Clinical Application of a Digital Odor Identification Test.

IF 1.3
Francisco Alves de Sousa, Márcio Nakanishi, Mariline Santos, Ana Nóbrega Pinto, Claúdia Galvão, Thomas Hummel
{"title":"Digitizing Olfactory Assessment in Portugal: Pilot Clinical Application of a Digital Odor Identification Test.","authors":"Francisco Alves de Sousa, Márcio Nakanishi, Mariline Santos, Ana Nóbrega Pinto, Claúdia Galvão, Thomas Hummel","doi":"10.1159/000547473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Current methods for olfactory assessment are often time-consuming and necessitate the involvement of an examiner for both administration and documentation of responses. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of a novel digital olfactory device, the MultiScent-20 odor identification test (MultiScent-IT), in distinguishing individuals with olfactory dysfunction from those with normal olfactory function.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The work was conducted and reported in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement for case-control studies. The test was administered to individuals with olfactory dysfunction (cases) and normosmic volunteers (controls), who were classified using the Sniffin' Sticks threshold test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant difference was observed in the total test scores between cases (9.6 ± 4.5) and controls (13.2 ± 1.9), p = 0.01. The test performance, defined as (total score/total time) × 100, was significantly lower in cases (1.9 ± 1.4) compared to controls (3.2 ± 1), p = 0.016. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.749, indicating a fair to good ability of the MultiScent-IT to discriminate between the groups. A MultiScent-IT score below 10 demonstrated perfect sensitivity (100%) in detecting olfactory dysfunction. Significant correlations were identified between the MultiScent-IT score and the Sniffin' Sticks threshold score (p = 0.009, r = 0.524), as well as the Portuguese version of the Olfactory Disorders Questionnaire (PT-ODQ) score (p = 0.013, r = -0.423).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MultiScent-IT is a promising tool for differentiating between individuals with and without olfactory dysfunction in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":520736,"journal":{"name":"ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503687/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Current methods for olfactory assessment are often time-consuming and necessitate the involvement of an examiner for both administration and documentation of responses. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of a novel digital olfactory device, the MultiScent-20 odor identification test (MultiScent-IT), in distinguishing individuals with olfactory dysfunction from those with normal olfactory function.

Materials and methods: The work was conducted and reported in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement for case-control studies. The test was administered to individuals with olfactory dysfunction (cases) and normosmic volunteers (controls), who were classified using the Sniffin' Sticks threshold test.

Results: A statistically significant difference was observed in the total test scores between cases (9.6 ± 4.5) and controls (13.2 ± 1.9), p = 0.01. The test performance, defined as (total score/total time) × 100, was significantly lower in cases (1.9 ± 1.4) compared to controls (3.2 ± 1), p = 0.016. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.749, indicating a fair to good ability of the MultiScent-IT to discriminate between the groups. A MultiScent-IT score below 10 demonstrated perfect sensitivity (100%) in detecting olfactory dysfunction. Significant correlations were identified between the MultiScent-IT score and the Sniffin' Sticks threshold score (p = 0.009, r = 0.524), as well as the Portuguese version of the Olfactory Disorders Questionnaire (PT-ODQ) score (p = 0.013, r = -0.423).

Conclusion: MultiScent-IT is a promising tool for differentiating between individuals with and without olfactory dysfunction in clinical settings.

数字化嗅觉评估在葡萄牙:试点临床应用的数字气味识别测试。
目前的嗅觉评估方法通常是耗时的,并且需要审查员参与管理和记录反应。本研究旨在评估一种新型数字嗅觉设备MultiScent-20通用气味识别测试(Multiscent-IT)在区分嗅觉功能障碍患者和嗅觉功能正常患者方面的临床应用。材料和方法:本研究按照病例对照研究的加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE)声明进行和报告。该测试适用于嗅觉功能障碍患者(病例)和正常志愿者(对照组),他们使用嗅探棒阈值测试进行分类。结果:两组患者总分(9.6±4.5)分与对照组(13.2±1.9)分比较,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.01)。测试表现,定义为(总分/总时间)x 100,病例(1.9±1.4)显著低于对照组(3.2±1),p = 0.016。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析显示,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.749,表明多气味识别组间的能力相当好。Multiscent-IT评分低于10分,在检测嗅觉功能障碍方面表现出完美的灵敏度(100%)。Multiscent-IT评分与嗅嗅棒阈值评分(p = 0.009, r = 0.524)以及葡萄牙语版嗅觉障碍问卷(PT-ODQ)评分(p = 0.013, r = -0.423)之间存在显著相关性。结论:在临床环境中,多气味- it是一种很有前途的工具,用于区分有和没有嗅觉功能障碍的个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信