Clinical Outcomes and Predictive Factors of Intraoperative Miosis During Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery: Results from the First 300 Cases.

Bu Ki Kim, Young Taek Chung
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes and Predictive Factors of Intraoperative Miosis During Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery: Results from the First 300 Cases.","authors":"Bu Ki Kim, Young Taek Chung","doi":"10.3341/kjo.2025.0064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare clinical outcomes between patients with and without intraoperative miosis during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and to identify risk factors for intraoperative miosis during the initial learning curve in the surgeon's first 300 consecutive cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included the first 300 consecutive FLACS cases performed by a single surgeon at a single center. A 5.0 mm capsulotomy was created in all cases using a femtosecond laser. Eyes were divided into 2 groups based on pupil diameter after femtosecond laser treatment: miosis group (<5 mm) and mydriasis group (≥5 mm). Clinical outcomes at 3 months were compared. Perioperative variables were analyzed to identify factors associated with intraoperative miosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 300 eyes, 52 (17.3%) were in the miosis group and 248 (82.7%) in the mydriasis group. The miosis group had significantly smaller preoperative pupil diameter (P = 0.002), narrower capsulotomy-pupil margin distance (P = 0.002), longer vacuum duration (P < 0.001), longer phacoemulsification time (P = 0.005), and more frequent multiple docking attempts (P = 0.009). The first 150 cases had a higher incidence of multiple docking attempts (P < 0.001) and miosis (P < 0.001) compared to the second 150 cases. At 3 months, the mean corrected distance visual acuity was -0.01 ± 0.03 and 0.00 ± 0.04 in the miosis and mydriasis groups, respectively (P = 0.890), with no significant differences observed in specular microscopy outcomes. No mechanical expanders were used in any case, and no intraoperative complications occurred in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Small preoperative pupil diameter, narrow capsulotomy-pupil margin distance, prolonged vacuum duration, multiple docking, and the surgeon's initial learning curve were associated with intraoperative miosis during FLACS. Although phacoemulsification time was prolonged, it did not lead to a higher rate of intraoperative complications or adversely affect postoperative clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":101356,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2025.0064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes between patients with and without intraoperative miosis during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and to identify risk factors for intraoperative miosis during the initial learning curve in the surgeon's first 300 consecutive cases.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included the first 300 consecutive FLACS cases performed by a single surgeon at a single center. A 5.0 mm capsulotomy was created in all cases using a femtosecond laser. Eyes were divided into 2 groups based on pupil diameter after femtosecond laser treatment: miosis group (<5 mm) and mydriasis group (≥5 mm). Clinical outcomes at 3 months were compared. Perioperative variables were analyzed to identify factors associated with intraoperative miosis.

Results: Of the 300 eyes, 52 (17.3%) were in the miosis group and 248 (82.7%) in the mydriasis group. The miosis group had significantly smaller preoperative pupil diameter (P = 0.002), narrower capsulotomy-pupil margin distance (P = 0.002), longer vacuum duration (P < 0.001), longer phacoemulsification time (P = 0.005), and more frequent multiple docking attempts (P = 0.009). The first 150 cases had a higher incidence of multiple docking attempts (P < 0.001) and miosis (P < 0.001) compared to the second 150 cases. At 3 months, the mean corrected distance visual acuity was -0.01 ± 0.03 and 0.00 ± 0.04 in the miosis and mydriasis groups, respectively (P = 0.890), with no significant differences observed in specular microscopy outcomes. No mechanical expanders were used in any case, and no intraoperative complications occurred in either group.

Conclusion: Small preoperative pupil diameter, narrow capsulotomy-pupil margin distance, prolonged vacuum duration, multiple docking, and the surgeon's initial learning curve were associated with intraoperative miosis during FLACS. Although phacoemulsification time was prolonged, it did not lead to a higher rate of intraoperative complications or adversely affect postoperative clinical outcomes.

飞秒激光辅助白内障手术术中瞳孔缩小的临床结果和预测因素:来自前300例的结果。
目的:比较飞秒激光辅助白内障手术(FLACS)中伴有和未伴有术中瞳孔缩小的患者的临床结果,并在连续300例外科医生的初始学习曲线中确定术中瞳孔缩小的危险因素。方法:本回顾性队列研究包括前300例连续FLACS病例,由同一位外科医生在同一中心进行手术。所有病例均采用飞秒激光进行5.0 mm囊腔切开术。结果:300只眼中,瞳孔缩小组52只(占17.3%),瞳孔缩小组248只(占82.7%)。缩小组术前瞳孔直径更小(P = 0.002),囊膜-瞳孔边缘距离更窄(P = 0.002),真空持续时间更长(P < 0.001),超声乳化时间更长(P = 0.005),多次对接次数更频繁(P = 0.009)。前150例的多次对接尝试发生率(P < 0.001)和缩小率(P < 0.001)高于后150例。3个月时,瞳孔缩小组和瞳孔缩小组的平均矫正距离视力分别为-0.01±0.03和0.00±0.04 (P = 0.890),而镜下观察结果差异无统计学意义。两组均未使用机械扩张器,均未发生术中并发症。结论:术前瞳孔直径小、囊膜切开-瞳孔缘距离窄、真空时间延长、多次对接、术者初始学习曲线与FLACS术中瞳孔缩小有关。虽然延长了超声乳化手术时间,但并未导致术中并发症发生率升高,也未对术后临床结果产生不良影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信