[Clinical ethics support with CURA. Acceptability and feasibility among medical practitioners in geriatric and palliative medicine].

Lieke M Swart, Malene V van Schaik, Charlotte C S Garstman, Eefje M Sizoo, Suzanne Metselaar
{"title":"[Clinical ethics support with CURA. Acceptability and feasibility among medical practitioners in geriatric and palliative medicine].","authors":"Lieke M Swart, Malene V van Schaik, Charlotte C S Garstman, Eefje M Sizoo, Suzanne Metselaar","doi":"10.54195/tgg19019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Moral conflicts are common within geriatric and palliative care and can lead to moral distress. Clinical ethics support helps healthcare providers in managing moral conflicts and moral distress. CURA is a low-threshold clinical ethics support instrument. The feasibility for nurses and nurse-assistants in palliative care has already been investigated. However, the acceptability and feasibility of CURA within medical practitioners is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective cohort study, using mixed methods. Participants are medical practitioners working in geriatric or palliative care, who attended a workshop on CURA. They received a baseline questionnaire (n=41) after the workshop regarding acceptability and a follow-up questionnaire (n=22) after three months regarding feasibility. Additionally, in-depth interviews (n=7) were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>68% of participants expressed intention to use CURA at baseline; 32% were uncertain. 14% has actually used CURA after three months. Feasibility is dependent of several factors: (1) recognizing a moral situation; (2) familiarity with the methodology; (3) scheduling a CURA moment; (4) the role of colleagues and the healthcare organization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Whereas CURA is an acceptable tool for medical practitioners, feasibility is found to be low if practitioners do not receive additional training and support.</p>","PeriodicalId":101340,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor gerontologie en geriatrie","volume":"55 3","pages":"2-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor gerontologie en geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54195/tgg19019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Moral conflicts are common within geriatric and palliative care and can lead to moral distress. Clinical ethics support helps healthcare providers in managing moral conflicts and moral distress. CURA is a low-threshold clinical ethics support instrument. The feasibility for nurses and nurse-assistants in palliative care has already been investigated. However, the acceptability and feasibility of CURA within medical practitioners is unclear.

Methods: Prospective cohort study, using mixed methods. Participants are medical practitioners working in geriatric or palliative care, who attended a workshop on CURA. They received a baseline questionnaire (n=41) after the workshop regarding acceptability and a follow-up questionnaire (n=22) after three months regarding feasibility. Additionally, in-depth interviews (n=7) were conducted.

Results: 68% of participants expressed intention to use CURA at baseline; 32% were uncertain. 14% has actually used CURA after three months. Feasibility is dependent of several factors: (1) recognizing a moral situation; (2) familiarity with the methodology; (3) scheduling a CURA moment; (4) the role of colleagues and the healthcare organization.

Conclusion: Whereas CURA is an acceptable tool for medical practitioners, feasibility is found to be low if practitioners do not receive additional training and support.

[临床伦理支持与CURA。老年医学和姑息医学从业人员的可接受性和可行性[j]。
道德冲突在老年和姑息治疗中很常见,并可能导致道德困扰。临床伦理支持帮助医疗保健提供者管理道德冲突和道德困境。CURA是一个低门槛的临床伦理支持工具。护士和护士助理在姑息治疗方面的可行性已经进行了调查。然而,CURA在医疗从业者中的可接受性和可行性尚不清楚。方法:采用混合方法进行前瞻性队列研究。参与者是在老年或姑息治疗领域工作的医生,他们参加了一个关于CURA的讲习班。他们在研讨会后收到了一份关于可接受性的基线问卷(n=41),在三个月后收到了一份关于可行性的后续问卷(n=22)。此外,还进行了深度访谈(n=7)。结果:68%的参与者在基线时表示有意使用CURA;32%的人不确定。14%的人在三个月后使用了CURA。可行性取决于几个因素:(1)认识到道德状况;(2)熟悉研究方法;(3)调度CURA时刻;(4)同事和医疗机构的作用。结论:虽然CURA是一种可接受的医疗从业者工具,但如果从业者没有得到额外的培训和支持,其可行性很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信