Developing a Novel Digital Tool for Personalised Antipsychotic Prescribing in People Living With Dementia: The Views of Australian Clinicians.

IF 2.2
Timothy Josh D Tan, Yun-Hee Jeon, Edward C Y Lau, Sarah N Hilmer, Lee-Fay Low, Christine Y Lu, Edwin C K Tan
{"title":"Developing a Novel Digital Tool for Personalised Antipsychotic Prescribing in People Living With Dementia: The Views of Australian Clinicians.","authors":"Timothy Josh D Tan, Yun-Hee Jeon, Edward C Y Lau, Sarah N Hilmer, Lee-Fay Low, Christine Y Lu, Edwin C K Tan","doi":"10.1177/14713012251366757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Optimising antipsychotic prescribing in people living with dementia is important to manage symptoms and avoid adverse events. Clinical decision support tools that predict therapeutic response based on individual patient characteristics can help personalise prescribing and complement decision-making by prescribers. The aim of this study is to investigate the views of Australian prescribers on the development and use of a digital antipsychotic prescribing support tool in dementia. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the perspectives of Australian prescribers on using a digital prescribing support tool in dementia. Semi-structured, individual interviews were conducted with a sample of 14 clinicians. Themes were organised according to topic areas about the development and use of the tool. Clinicians expressed that the tool could assist in <i>identifying risk</i>, allowing prescribers to be more cautious with antipsychotic prescribing. The tool could promote <i>informed decision-making</i> by assisting prescribers to consider more factors prior to prescribing whilst serving as an educational tool to aid shared decision-making with patients and carers. Though there were benefits, clinicians raised that there are <i>complexities of antipsychotic prescribing,</i> as the tool may not account for situational need, where benefits may outweigh risks. Some clinicians expressed <i>potential concerns with technology-based tools</i>, where some prescribers may void their clinical judgement and over-rely on the tool. Some clinicians highlighted younger practitioners, general practitioners, nurses and pharmacists as <i>potential users</i> who could benefit from its use. Clinicians posed <i>suggestions for development</i>, including accessibility through an app, updating data as evidence and guidelines change, and prompts to aid decision-making. This study identified several considerations on the implementation of the tool in clinical practice. Perspectives raised by clinicians should be considered in the tool's future development.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"14713012251366757"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251366757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimising antipsychotic prescribing in people living with dementia is important to manage symptoms and avoid adverse events. Clinical decision support tools that predict therapeutic response based on individual patient characteristics can help personalise prescribing and complement decision-making by prescribers. The aim of this study is to investigate the views of Australian prescribers on the development and use of a digital antipsychotic prescribing support tool in dementia. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the perspectives of Australian prescribers on using a digital prescribing support tool in dementia. Semi-structured, individual interviews were conducted with a sample of 14 clinicians. Themes were organised according to topic areas about the development and use of the tool. Clinicians expressed that the tool could assist in identifying risk, allowing prescribers to be more cautious with antipsychotic prescribing. The tool could promote informed decision-making by assisting prescribers to consider more factors prior to prescribing whilst serving as an educational tool to aid shared decision-making with patients and carers. Though there were benefits, clinicians raised that there are complexities of antipsychotic prescribing, as the tool may not account for situational need, where benefits may outweigh risks. Some clinicians expressed potential concerns with technology-based tools, where some prescribers may void their clinical judgement and over-rely on the tool. Some clinicians highlighted younger practitioners, general practitioners, nurses and pharmacists as potential users who could benefit from its use. Clinicians posed suggestions for development, including accessibility through an app, updating data as evidence and guidelines change, and prompts to aid decision-making. This study identified several considerations on the implementation of the tool in clinical practice. Perspectives raised by clinicians should be considered in the tool's future development.

开发一种新的数字工具,为痴呆症患者提供个性化的抗精神病药物处方:澳大利亚临床医生的观点。
优化痴呆患者的抗精神病药物处方对于控制症状和避免不良事件非常重要。临床决策支持工具,预测治疗反应的基础上的个体患者的特点,可以帮助个性化处方和补充决策的处方。本研究的目的是调查澳大利亚处方者对痴呆症数字抗精神病处方支持工具的开发和使用的看法。主题分析用于分析澳大利亚处方者在痴呆症中使用数字处方支持工具的观点。对14名临床医生进行了半结构化的个人访谈。主题是根据关于该工具的开发和使用的主题领域组织的。临床医生表示,该工具可以帮助识别风险,使处方者在开抗精神病药物处方时更加谨慎。该工具可以通过帮助开处方者在开处方前考虑更多因素来促进知情决策,同时作为一种教育工具来帮助患者和护理人员共同决策。虽然有好处,但临床医生提出,抗精神病药物处方存在复杂性,因为该工具可能无法解释情境需求,在这种情况下,好处可能大于风险。一些临床医生表达了对基于技术的工具的潜在担忧,其中一些开处方者可能会使他们的临床判断无效并过度依赖该工具。一些临床医生强调,年轻的开业医生、全科医生、护士和药剂师是可能从其使用中受益的潜在用户。临床医生提出了发展建议,包括通过应用程序访问,随着证据和指南的变化更新数据,以及帮助决策的提示。本研究确定了在临床实践中实施该工具的几个考虑因素。临床医生提出的观点应该在工具的未来发展中加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信