Fat Intake from Different Dietary Sources and Incidence of Pancreatic Cancer in Adults: An Updated Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Samira Razavi, Javad Anjom-Shoae, Maryam Zeydi, Niloofar Eshaghian, Christine Feinle-Bisset, Gholamreza Askari, Omid Sadeghi
{"title":"Fat Intake from Different Dietary Sources and Incidence of Pancreatic Cancer in Adults: An Updated Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.","authors":"Samira Razavi, Javad Anjom-Shoae, Maryam Zeydi, Niloofar Eshaghian, Christine Feinle-Bisset, Gholamreza Askari, Omid Sadeghi","doi":"10.1080/01635581.2025.2542551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous meta-analyses on dietary fat and pancreatic cancer incidence have not explored the dose-response relationships. The current meta-analysis was conducted to assess the dose-response associations of total, animal, plant, meat, and dairy fat intake with pancreatic cancer risk in adults. A comprehensive literature search of relevant online databases was performed until April 2025 to detect eligible studies, identifying nine prospective cohort studies with a total sample size of 1,331,651 participants. Based on the highest versus lowest comparison, risk of pancreatic cancer was not significantly associated with dietary intakes of total (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.87-1.20), animal (RR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.70-1.57), plant (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.82-1.07), meat (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.89-1.44), and dairy fats (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.81-1.26). However, in the subgroup analyses, we found a significant positive association between total fat intake and pancreatic cancer risk among studies with high-quality, defined based on the ROBINS-E tool (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.04-1.34). In the dose-response meta-analysis, we did not find a linear or non-linear association between fat intake (total and different types of fats) and pancreatic cancer risk. Overall, our findings suggest that dietary fat intake is directly associated with pancreatic cancer when assessed in high-quality studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54701,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal","volume":" ","pages":"983-995"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2025.2542551","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous meta-analyses on dietary fat and pancreatic cancer incidence have not explored the dose-response relationships. The current meta-analysis was conducted to assess the dose-response associations of total, animal, plant, meat, and dairy fat intake with pancreatic cancer risk in adults. A comprehensive literature search of relevant online databases was performed until April 2025 to detect eligible studies, identifying nine prospective cohort studies with a total sample size of 1,331,651 participants. Based on the highest versus lowest comparison, risk of pancreatic cancer was not significantly associated with dietary intakes of total (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.87-1.20), animal (RR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.70-1.57), plant (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.82-1.07), meat (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.89-1.44), and dairy fats (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.81-1.26). However, in the subgroup analyses, we found a significant positive association between total fat intake and pancreatic cancer risk among studies with high-quality, defined based on the ROBINS-E tool (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.04-1.34). In the dose-response meta-analysis, we did not find a linear or non-linear association between fat intake (total and different types of fats) and pancreatic cancer risk. Overall, our findings suggest that dietary fat intake is directly associated with pancreatic cancer when assessed in high-quality studies.

成人不同饮食来源的脂肪摄入与胰腺癌发病率:前瞻性队列研究的最新系统评价和剂量-反应荟萃分析
先前关于饮食脂肪和胰腺癌发病率的荟萃分析尚未探讨剂量-反应关系。目前进行的荟萃分析旨在评估成人总脂肪、动物、植物、肉类和乳制品脂肪摄入量与胰腺癌风险的剂量-反应关系。到2025年4月,对相关在线数据库进行了全面的文献检索,以发现符合条件的研究,确定了9项前瞻性队列研究,总样本量为1,331,651名参与者。根据最高和最低的比较,胰腺癌的风险与总膳食摄入量(RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.87-1.20)、动物(RR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.70-1.57)、植物(RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.82-1.07)、肉类(RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.89-1.44)和乳制品脂肪(RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.81-1.26)没有显著相关。然而,在亚组分析中,我们发现在基于ROBINS-E工具定义的高质量研究中,总脂肪摄入量与胰腺癌风险之间存在显著的正相关(RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.04-1.34)。在剂量-反应荟萃分析中,我们没有发现脂肪摄入量(总脂肪和不同类型脂肪)与胰腺癌风险之间存在线性或非线性关联。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,在高质量的研究中,膳食脂肪摄入与胰腺癌直接相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: This timely publication reports and reviews current findings on the effects of nutrition on the etiology, therapy, and prevention of cancer. Etiological issues include clinical and experimental research in nutrition, carcinogenesis, epidemiology, biochemistry, and molecular biology. Coverage of therapy focuses on research in clinical nutrition and oncology, dietetics, and bioengineering. Prevention approaches include public health recommendations, preventative medicine, behavior modification, education, functional foods, and agricultural and food production policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信