Design of a randomized tobacco cessation trial among FDNY World Trade Center responders in a lung cancer screening program.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
David G Goldfarb, Tyrone Moline, David J Prezant, Matthew P Bars, Rachel Zeig-Owens, Theresa Schwartz, Madeline F Cannon, Brandon Vaeth, Julia H Arnsten, Mayris P Webber, Shadi Nahvi
{"title":"Design of a randomized tobacco cessation trial among FDNY World Trade Center responders in a lung cancer screening program.","authors":"David G Goldfarb, Tyrone Moline, David J Prezant, Matthew P Bars, Rachel Zeig-Owens, Theresa Schwartz, Madeline F Cannon, Brandon Vaeth, Julia H Arnsten, Mayris P Webber, Shadi Nahvi","doi":"10.1186/s13722-025-00598-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cigarette smoking remains the leading preventable cause of death, posing heightened risks for vulnerable populations. World Trade Center (WTC) disaster responders face an elevated burden of respiratory diseases, and despite access to an evidence-based tobacco cessation program, a subset continues to smoke cigarettes. Treatment engagement remains a critical barrier, as many people who smoke fail to enroll in or adhere to programs, particularly when participation requires decisions to actively opt-in to treatment. This randomized controlled trial integrates tobacco treatment into an existing low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening program and compares the effectiveness of an Enhanced Care intervention with opt-out enrollment and biofeedback to Standard Care with opt-in enrollment and standard treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The trial includes retired Fire Department of the City of New York (FDNY) responders aged 50 years or older who have a smoking history that satisfies either the National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria of at least 20 pack-years or a simplified criterion of at least 20 years of smoking. Participants are randomized to either Enhanced Care, featuring opt-out enrollment in tobacco treatment with tailored counseling using biofeedback from chest LDCT and spirometry results, or Standard Care, requiring opt-in enrollment and standard tobacco treatment without biofeedback. Both arms receive a varenicline regimen with 4 weeks of pre-loading. Primary outcomes are treatment enrollment and biochemically verified 7-day abstinence. Factors associated with enrollment and abstinence, including retention, adherence, and quit motivation, will be evaluated.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This trial addresses a key gap in tobacco cessation research by testing an innovative intervention for a high-risk occupational cohort participating in LDCT screening. The Enhanced Care model integrates opt-out enrollment, personalized biofeedback, and varenicline preloading to reduce smoking rates and health burdens in FDNY responders. Findings aim to inform scalable cessation strategies for both occupational and general populations, highlighting the need for novel approaches for hard-to-treat individuals who smoke.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT05997225.</p>","PeriodicalId":54223,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":"62"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12323262/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-025-00598-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cigarette smoking remains the leading preventable cause of death, posing heightened risks for vulnerable populations. World Trade Center (WTC) disaster responders face an elevated burden of respiratory diseases, and despite access to an evidence-based tobacco cessation program, a subset continues to smoke cigarettes. Treatment engagement remains a critical barrier, as many people who smoke fail to enroll in or adhere to programs, particularly when participation requires decisions to actively opt-in to treatment. This randomized controlled trial integrates tobacco treatment into an existing low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening program and compares the effectiveness of an Enhanced Care intervention with opt-out enrollment and biofeedback to Standard Care with opt-in enrollment and standard treatment.

Methods: The trial includes retired Fire Department of the City of New York (FDNY) responders aged 50 years or older who have a smoking history that satisfies either the National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria of at least 20 pack-years or a simplified criterion of at least 20 years of smoking. Participants are randomized to either Enhanced Care, featuring opt-out enrollment in tobacco treatment with tailored counseling using biofeedback from chest LDCT and spirometry results, or Standard Care, requiring opt-in enrollment and standard tobacco treatment without biofeedback. Both arms receive a varenicline regimen with 4 weeks of pre-loading. Primary outcomes are treatment enrollment and biochemically verified 7-day abstinence. Factors associated with enrollment and abstinence, including retention, adherence, and quit motivation, will be evaluated.

Discussion: This trial addresses a key gap in tobacco cessation research by testing an innovative intervention for a high-risk occupational cohort participating in LDCT screening. The Enhanced Care model integrates opt-out enrollment, personalized biofeedback, and varenicline preloading to reduce smoking rates and health burdens in FDNY responders. Findings aim to inform scalable cessation strategies for both occupational and general populations, highlighting the need for novel approaches for hard-to-treat individuals who smoke.

Trial registration: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT05997225.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在FDNY世贸中心应答者中设计一项肺癌筛查项目的随机戒烟试验。
背景:吸烟仍然是可预防的主要死亡原因,对弱势群体构成更大的风险。世界贸易中心(世贸中心)的救灾人员面临着呼吸系统疾病负担的增加,尽管有循证戒烟计划,但仍有一部分人继续吸烟。参与治疗仍然是一个关键障碍,因为许多吸烟者没有参加或坚持治疗方案,特别是当参与治疗需要决定积极选择参加治疗时。这项随机对照试验将烟草治疗纳入现有的低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)肺癌筛查计划,并比较了选择退出登记和生物反馈的强化护理干预与选择加入登记和标准治疗的标准护理的有效性。方法:该试验包括纽约市消防局(FDNY) 50岁或以上的退休响应者,他们有吸烟史,符合国家综合癌症网络标准至少20包年或至少20年吸烟的简化标准。参与者被随机分配到增强治疗组,其特点是选择退出烟草治疗组,并使用胸部LDCT和肺活量测量结果的生物反馈进行量身定制的咨询;或标准治疗组,要求选择入组和标准烟草治疗组,但没有生物反馈。两组均接受varenicline治疗,预负荷4周。主要结果是治疗入组和生化验证的7天戒断。与入组和戒烟相关的因素,包括保留、坚持和戒烟动机,将进行评估。讨论:本试验通过对参与LDCT筛查的高风险职业队列进行创新干预,解决了戒烟研究中的一个关键空白。强化护理模式整合了选择退出登记、个性化生物反馈和varenicline预负荷,以降低FDNY响应者的吸烟率和健康负担。研究结果旨在为职业人群和一般人群提供可扩展的戒烟策略,强调需要为难以治疗的吸烟者提供新方法。试验注册:该试验在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,识别码为NCT05997225。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice provides a forum for clinically relevant research and perspectives that contribute to improving the quality of care for people with unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, or other drug use and addictive behaviours across a spectrum of clinical settings. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice accepts articles of clinical relevance related to the prevention and treatment of unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use across the spectrum of clinical settings. Topics of interest address issues related to the following: the spectrum of unhealthy use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs among the range of affected persons (e.g., not limited by age, race/ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation); the array of clinical prevention and treatment practices (from health messages, to identification and early intervention, to more extensive interventions including counseling and pharmacotherapy and other management strategies); and identification and management of medical, psychiatric, social, and other health consequences of substance use. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is particularly interested in articles that address how to improve the quality of care for people with unhealthy substance use and related conditions as described in the (US) Institute of Medicine report, Improving the Quality of Healthcare for Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006). Such articles address the quality of care and of health services. Although the journal also welcomes submissions that address these conditions in addiction speciality-treatment settings, the journal is particularly interested in including articles that address unhealthy use outside these settings, including experience with novel models of care and outcomes, and outcomes of research-practice collaborations. Although Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is generally not an outlet for basic science research, we will accept basic science research manuscripts that have clearly described potential clinical relevance and are accessible to audiences outside a narrow laboratory research field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信