Treatment Use and Preference in a Diverse Sample of Women With Mood Disorders.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Robert T Ammerman, Megan E Deichen, Rhonda C Boyd, Kayla D Longoria, Melissa Wagner-Schuman, Diana I Simeonova, Heather A Flynn, Sandra J Weiss
{"title":"Treatment Use and Preference in a Diverse Sample of Women With Mood Disorders.","authors":"Robert T Ammerman, Megan E Deichen, Rhonda C Boyd, Kayla D Longoria, Melissa Wagner-Schuman, Diana I Simeonova, Heather A Flynn, Sandra J Weiss","doi":"10.4088/JCP.25m15823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To examine differences in treatment use and preference among women with mood disorders based on race, ethnicity, and type of health insurance.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Women (N = 2,877) with depression, anxiety, and bipolar disorders were surveyed in primary care and specialty clinics affiliated with the National Network of Depression Centers from January 2018 to December 2020. Logistic regression was employed to examine the probabilities of Black, White, and Hispanic women, who varied on public (government-funded) vs private insurance, using and preferring medication, psychotherapy, or complementary treatments.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Black women had lower odds of receiving medications for treatment of all mood disorders, while White women had higher odds. For example, in treatment of depression, the odds ratio (OR) for Black women was 0.435 (<i>P</i>=.011), while the OR for White women was 2.048 (<i>P</i>=.009). Hispanic women had higher odds of using complementary treatments than other women. For example, in treatment of anxiety, their OR was 2.346 (<i>P</i>=.008). Across mood disorders, government-funded (Medicaid/Medicare) coverage was associated with greater use of psychotherapy and complementary treatments (ORs ranging from 1.529 to 5.011) as well as greater medication use for bipolar disorder (OR=5.805, <i>P</i>=.027). Psychotherapy was preferred by the majority of all women (55.5%), although preferences for other treatments differed between racial/ethnic groups.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Research is needed regarding the degree to which clinicians are offering varied treatments to diverse women with mood disorders and how clinicians consider women's preferences. Results highlight the necessity for treatment that integrates culturally based values and preferences, along with policies that ensure treatment access for women who are privately insured.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"86 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.25m15823","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine differences in treatment use and preference among women with mood disorders based on race, ethnicity, and type of health insurance.

Methods: Women (N = 2,877) with depression, anxiety, and bipolar disorders were surveyed in primary care and specialty clinics affiliated with the National Network of Depression Centers from January 2018 to December 2020. Logistic regression was employed to examine the probabilities of Black, White, and Hispanic women, who varied on public (government-funded) vs private insurance, using and preferring medication, psychotherapy, or complementary treatments.

Results: Black women had lower odds of receiving medications for treatment of all mood disorders, while White women had higher odds. For example, in treatment of depression, the odds ratio (OR) for Black women was 0.435 (P=.011), while the OR for White women was 2.048 (P=.009). Hispanic women had higher odds of using complementary treatments than other women. For example, in treatment of anxiety, their OR was 2.346 (P=.008). Across mood disorders, government-funded (Medicaid/Medicare) coverage was associated with greater use of psychotherapy and complementary treatments (ORs ranging from 1.529 to 5.011) as well as greater medication use for bipolar disorder (OR=5.805, P=.027). Psychotherapy was preferred by the majority of all women (55.5%), although preferences for other treatments differed between racial/ethnic groups.

Conclusions: Research is needed regarding the degree to which clinicians are offering varied treatments to diverse women with mood disorders and how clinicians consider women's preferences. Results highlight the necessity for treatment that integrates culturally based values and preferences, along with policies that ensure treatment access for women who are privately insured.

不同心境障碍妇女样本的治疗使用和偏好。
目的:研究基于种族、民族和健康保险类型的情绪障碍妇女在治疗使用和偏好方面的差异。方法:2018年1月至2020年12月,在国家抑郁中心网络附属的初级保健和专科诊所对患有抑郁、焦虑和双相情感障碍的女性(N = 2877)进行了调查。采用Logistic回归来检验黑人、白人和西班牙裔妇女的概率,她们在公共(政府资助)与私人保险、使用和偏好药物、心理治疗或补充治疗方面存在差异。结果:黑人女性接受所有情绪障碍药物治疗的几率较低,而白人女性的几率较高。例如,在治疗抑郁症方面,黑人女性的比值比(OR)为0.435 (P= 0.011),而白人女性的比值比(OR)为2.048 (P= 0.009)。西班牙裔女性使用辅助治疗的几率高于其他女性。例如,在治疗焦虑方面,他们的OR为2.346 (P= 0.008)。在情绪障碍方面,政府资助的(医疗补助/医疗保险)覆盖范围与心理治疗和补充治疗的更多使用(OR值从1.529到5.011)以及双相情感障碍的更多药物使用(OR值=5.805,P= 0.027)相关。大多数女性(55.5%)更喜欢心理治疗,尽管对其他治疗的偏好因种族/族裔群体而异。结论:需要对临床医生对不同心境障碍女性提供不同治疗的程度以及临床医生如何考虑女性的偏好进行研究。结果强调,治疗必须结合基于文化的价值观和偏好,以及确保私人保险妇女获得治疗的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 75 years, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry has been a leading source of peer-reviewed articles offering the latest information on mental health topics to psychiatrists and other medical professionals.The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry is the leading psychiatric resource for clinical information and covers disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, addiction, posttraumatic stress disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder while exploring the newest advances in diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信