Laparoscopic Interval Appendectomy as Safe and Effective Treatment of Complicated Appendicitis after Failed Initial Conservative Approach: A Single-Center Experience.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Ciro Esposito, Fulvia Del Conte, Mariapina Cerulo, Vincenzo Coppola, Vincenzo Bagnara, Francesco Tedesco, Claudia Di Mento, Annalisa Chiodi, Giorgia Esposito, Chiara Boccarossa, Maria Escolino
{"title":"Laparoscopic Interval Appendectomy as Safe and Effective Treatment of Complicated Appendicitis after Failed Initial Conservative Approach: A Single-Center Experience.","authors":"Ciro Esposito, Fulvia Del Conte, Mariapina Cerulo, Vincenzo Coppola, Vincenzo Bagnara, Francesco Tedesco, Claudia Di Mento, Annalisa Chiodi, Giorgia Esposito, Chiara Boccarossa, Maria Escolino","doi":"10.1177/10926429251366867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Following the COVID-19 pandemic, antibiotic therapy has become the first-line treatment for acute appendicitis (AA) in many centers. Interval appendectomy (IA) is often needed later due to symptom recurrence. This paper aimed to report our experience with early, unplanned laparoscopic IA (LIA) over the past 2 years. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> All patients with previous AA initially managed with antibiotics who underwent LIA due to symptom recurrence over the period January 2022-March 2024 were enrolled. Parameters assessed included patients' characteristics and operative outcomes. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The patient cohort included 40 girls and 31 boys, with a median age of 13.3 years (range 9-17). All LIAs were accomplished laparoscopically without conversions or intraoperative complications. The median operative time was 27 minutes (range 15-48). The appendix was ligated using two endoloops in 28/71 (39.4%) and resected using an automatic stapler in 43/71 (60.6%). A retrocecal appendix was found in 25/71 (35%), and adhesions between the appendix and the surrounding tissues in 31/71 (43%). Parasitic helminths were found in the lumen of the appendix in 5/71 (7%). Meckel's diverticulum was negative in all cases. The median hospitalization was 32 hours (range 26-50). No postoperative complications occurred. Pathology confirmed intramural inflammation with peri-appendiceal fibrosis in all patients. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Our study confirms that early laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe and feasible option after failed nonoperative management of complicated appendicitis. All procedures were completed laparoscopically without complications. Given the presence of adhesions and retrocecal appendix in many cases, further studies are needed to refine optimal treatment strategies and timing.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"758-762"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429251366867","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Following the COVID-19 pandemic, antibiotic therapy has become the first-line treatment for acute appendicitis (AA) in many centers. Interval appendectomy (IA) is often needed later due to symptom recurrence. This paper aimed to report our experience with early, unplanned laparoscopic IA (LIA) over the past 2 years. Materials and Methods: All patients with previous AA initially managed with antibiotics who underwent LIA due to symptom recurrence over the period January 2022-March 2024 were enrolled. Parameters assessed included patients' characteristics and operative outcomes. Results: The patient cohort included 40 girls and 31 boys, with a median age of 13.3 years (range 9-17). All LIAs were accomplished laparoscopically without conversions or intraoperative complications. The median operative time was 27 minutes (range 15-48). The appendix was ligated using two endoloops in 28/71 (39.4%) and resected using an automatic stapler in 43/71 (60.6%). A retrocecal appendix was found in 25/71 (35%), and adhesions between the appendix and the surrounding tissues in 31/71 (43%). Parasitic helminths were found in the lumen of the appendix in 5/71 (7%). Meckel's diverticulum was negative in all cases. The median hospitalization was 32 hours (range 26-50). No postoperative complications occurred. Pathology confirmed intramural inflammation with peri-appendiceal fibrosis in all patients. Conclusions: Our study confirms that early laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe and feasible option after failed nonoperative management of complicated appendicitis. All procedures were completed laparoscopically without complications. Given the presence of adhesions and retrocecal appendix in many cases, further studies are needed to refine optimal treatment strategies and timing.

首次保守入路失败后腹腔镜间隔阑尾切除术安全有效治疗复杂阑尾炎:单中心经验。
背景:随着COVID-19大流行,抗生素治疗已成为许多中心治疗急性阑尾炎(AA)的一线治疗方法。间隔期阑尾切除术(IA)往往需要后,由于症状复发。本文旨在报告我们在过去2年中早期,计划外腹腔镜IA (LIA)的经验。材料与方法:纳入所有在2022年1月至2024年3月期间因症状复发而接受抗生素治疗的既往AA患者。评估的参数包括患者特征和手术结果。结果:患者队列包括40名女孩和31名男孩,中位年龄为13.3岁(范围9-17岁)。所有LIAs均在腹腔镜下完成,无转换或术中并发症。中位手术时间为27分钟(15-48分钟)。28/71(39.4%)采用双内环结扎阑尾,43/71(60.6%)采用自动吻合器切除阑尾。盲肠后阑尾25/71例(35%),阑尾与周围组织粘连31/71例(43%)。5/71(7%)在阑尾管腔内发现寄生蠕虫。所有病例梅克尔憩室均为阴性。住院时间中位数为32小时(范围26-50小时)。无术后并发症发生。病理证实所有患者均为壁内炎症伴阑尾周围纤维化。结论:我们的研究证实,在非手术治疗失败后,早期腹腔镜阑尾切除术是一种安全可行的选择。所有手术均在腹腔镜下完成,无并发症。鉴于在许多病例中存在粘连和盲肠后阑尾,需要进一步研究以确定最佳治疗策略和时机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信