A systematic review of clinical assessment tools that evaluate the feeding skills domain for paediatric feeding disorder.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Jeanne Marshall, Memorie M Gosa, Pamela Dodrill
{"title":"A systematic review of clinical assessment tools that evaluate the feeding skills domain for paediatric feeding disorder.","authors":"Jeanne Marshall, Memorie M Gosa, Pamela Dodrill","doi":"10.1080/17549507.2025.2538617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is limited evidence regarding which clinical assessment tools are best utilised to assess feeding skills in Paediatric Feeding Disorder. This systematic review aimed to identify and assess the quality of clinical assessment tools designed to measure feeding skills.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A search was conducted (up to 31 July 2023). Assessment tools were included if they: (a) targeted the feeding skills domain for Paediatric Feeding Disorder; and (b) were appropriate for children >6 months-18 years. Psychometric properties for each tool were extracted and assessed using the COnsensus-based Standards for the Selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>In total, 12 clinical assessment tools were reviewed across 19 studies. These tools were found to be appropriate for a wide age range, of variable length, and mostly freely available. Variable methodological quality was observed, with most tools demonstrating adequate reliability but having limited information on validity. None of the reviewed tools used testing to demonstrate whether the tool could capture change over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are limited clinical assessment tools available to measure paediatric feeding skills, and none of the reviewed tools demonstrated sensitivity to change in function over time. No tool was suitable for universal application in children with Paediatric Feeding Disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":49047,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2025.2538617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: There is limited evidence regarding which clinical assessment tools are best utilised to assess feeding skills in Paediatric Feeding Disorder. This systematic review aimed to identify and assess the quality of clinical assessment tools designed to measure feeding skills.

Method: A search was conducted (up to 31 July 2023). Assessment tools were included if they: (a) targeted the feeding skills domain for Paediatric Feeding Disorder; and (b) were appropriate for children >6 months-18 years. Psychometric properties for each tool were extracted and assessed using the COnsensus-based Standards for the Selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.

Result: In total, 12 clinical assessment tools were reviewed across 19 studies. These tools were found to be appropriate for a wide age range, of variable length, and mostly freely available. Variable methodological quality was observed, with most tools demonstrating adequate reliability but having limited information on validity. None of the reviewed tools used testing to demonstrate whether the tool could capture change over time.

Conclusion: There are limited clinical assessment tools available to measure paediatric feeding skills, and none of the reviewed tools demonstrated sensitivity to change in function over time. No tool was suitable for universal application in children with Paediatric Feeding Disorder.

对儿科喂养障碍喂养技能领域临床评估工具的系统回顾。
目的:关于哪些临床评估工具最适合用于评估儿科喂养障碍患者的喂养技巧,证据有限。本系统综述旨在识别和评估用于测量喂养技能的临床评估工具的质量。方法:进行检索(截至2023年7月31日)。如果评估工具:(a)针对儿科喂养障碍的喂养技能领域,则纳入评估工具;(b)适用于6个月至18岁的儿童。使用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)核对表提取和评估每种工具的心理测量特性。结果:19项研究共回顾了12种临床评估工具。我们发现这些工具适用于广泛的年龄范围、不同的长度,而且大多是免费提供的。观察到不同的方法质量,大多数工具显示足够的可靠性,但对有效性的信息有限。经过审查的工具都没有使用测试来证明该工具是否能够捕获随时间变化的变化。结论:用于衡量儿科喂养技能的临床评估工具有限,而且所审查的工具中没有一个显示出随时间功能变化的敏感性。没有一种工具适合普遍应用于儿童喂养障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
73
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is an international journal which promotes discussion on a broad range of current clinical and theoretical issues. Submissions may include experimental, review and theoretical discussion papers, with studies from either quantitative and/or qualitative frameworks. Articles may relate to any area of child or adult communication or dysphagia, furthering knowledge on issues related to etiology, assessment, diagnosis, intervention, or theoretical frameworks. Articles can be accompanied by supplementary audio and video files that will be uploaded to the journal’s website. Special issues on contemporary topics are published at least once a year. A scientific forum is included in many issues, where a topic is debated by invited international experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信