Utility of long-term systolic blood pressure variability for predicting the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Zean Song, Yuanying Li, Young-Jae Hong, Chifa Chiang, Masaaki Matsunaga, Yupeng He, Atsuhiko Ota, Koji Tamakoshi, Hiroshi Yatsuya
{"title":"Utility of long-term systolic blood pressure variability for predicting the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus.","authors":"Zean Song, Yuanying Li, Young-Jae Hong, Chifa Chiang, Masaaki Matsunaga, Yupeng He, Atsuhiko Ota, Koji Tamakoshi, Hiroshi Yatsuya","doi":"10.18999/nagjms.87.2.220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Better identification of individuals at high risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) requires risk-prediction models incorporating novel predictors. Accordingly, this study aimed to evaluate the merits of including long-term systolic blood pressure variability (SBPV) in predicting T2DM incidence in a Japanese cohort of 3017 participants (2446 men, 571 women; age, 36-65 years) in 2007, who were followed up until March 2019. Consecutive SBP values, recorded between 2003 and 2007, were regressed annually for each participant. The slope and root-mean-square error of the regression line were calculated for each individual to represent SBPV. The significance of SBPV was examined by adding it to a multivariate Cox model incorporating age, sex, smoking status, regular exercise, family history of diabetes, body mass index, blood levels of triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and fasting blood glucose. The c-index, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to compare the performance of the prediction models without (Model 1) and with (Model 2) SBPV. During the 9.8-year follow-up period, 135 participants developed T2DM. Although a statistically significant difference in c-index between Model 1 (0.785) and Model 2 (0.786) was not found, the NRI (8.312% [<i>p</i> < 0.001]) and IDI (0.700% [<i>p</i> = 0.012]) demonstrated that the performance of Model 2 improved compared with Model 1. In conclusion, results suggested that long-term SBPV slightly improved predictive utility for T2DM when added to a conventional prediction model. The study was registered at University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial registry (UMIN000052544, https://www.umin.ac.jp/).</p>","PeriodicalId":49014,"journal":{"name":"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science","volume":"87 2","pages":"220-236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.87.2.220","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Better identification of individuals at high risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) requires risk-prediction models incorporating novel predictors. Accordingly, this study aimed to evaluate the merits of including long-term systolic blood pressure variability (SBPV) in predicting T2DM incidence in a Japanese cohort of 3017 participants (2446 men, 571 women; age, 36-65 years) in 2007, who were followed up until March 2019. Consecutive SBP values, recorded between 2003 and 2007, were regressed annually for each participant. The slope and root-mean-square error of the regression line were calculated for each individual to represent SBPV. The significance of SBPV was examined by adding it to a multivariate Cox model incorporating age, sex, smoking status, regular exercise, family history of diabetes, body mass index, blood levels of triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and fasting blood glucose. The c-index, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to compare the performance of the prediction models without (Model 1) and with (Model 2) SBPV. During the 9.8-year follow-up period, 135 participants developed T2DM. Although a statistically significant difference in c-index between Model 1 (0.785) and Model 2 (0.786) was not found, the NRI (8.312% [p < 0.001]) and IDI (0.700% [p = 0.012]) demonstrated that the performance of Model 2 improved compared with Model 1. In conclusion, results suggested that long-term SBPV slightly improved predictive utility for T2DM when added to a conventional prediction model. The study was registered at University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial registry (UMIN000052544, https://www.umin.ac.jp/).

Abstract Image

长期收缩压变异性在预测2型糖尿病发展中的应用。
为了更好地识别2型糖尿病(T2DM)的高危人群,需要建立包含新型预测因子的风险预测模型。因此,本研究旨在评估包括长期收缩压变异性(SBPV)在内的预测T2DM发病率的优点,该研究纳入了日本3017名参与者(2446名男性,571名女性;年龄(36-65岁),随访至2019年3月。2003年至2007年间记录的连续收缩压值每年对每个参与者进行回归。计算每个个体回归线的斜率和均方根误差来表示SBPV。通过将SBPV加入多变量Cox模型(包括年龄、性别、吸烟状况、定期运动、糖尿病家族史、体重指数、血液甘油三酯水平、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和空腹血糖)来检验SBPV的意义。采用c指数、净重分类改进(NRI)和综合区分改进(IDI)来比较没有(模型1)和有(模型2)SBPV的预测模型的性能。在9.8年的随访期间,135名参与者发展为2型糖尿病。虽然模型1的c指数(0.785)与模型2的c指数(0.786)没有统计学差异,但NRI (8.312% [p < 0.001])和IDI (0.700% [p = 0.012])表明模型2的性能较模型1有所提高。总之,结果表明,当将长期SBPV添加到传统预测模型中时,T2DM的预测效用略有提高。该研究已在大学医院医学信息网络临床试验注册中心注册(UMIN000052544, https://www.umin.ac.jp/)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nagoya Journal of Medical Science
Nagoya Journal of Medical Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original papers in the areas of medical science and its related fields. Reviews, symposium reports, short communications, notes, case reports, hypothesis papers, medical image at a glance, video and announcements are also accepted. Manuscripts should be in English. It is recommended that an English check of the manuscript by a competent and knowledgeable native speaker be completed before submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信