Fall prevention interventions in community-dwelling older people with cognitive impairment: a systematic review.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sumattana Glangkarn, Pelden Chejor, Rujira Nonsa-Ard, Kasama Wongprachum, Sirapat Khodseewong, Chaiwut Bourneow, Davina Porock
{"title":"Fall prevention interventions in community-dwelling older people with cognitive impairment: a systematic review.","authors":"Sumattana Glangkarn, Pelden Chejor, Rujira Nonsa-Ard, Kasama Wongprachum, Sirapat Khodseewong, Chaiwut Bourneow, Davina Porock","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Falls are a major health concern for older adults, particularly those with cognitive impairment. Many factors contribute to the risk of falls, making it a complex issue to manage.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This systematic review aimed to identify and describe the implementation strategies used for fall prevention in community-dwelling older people with cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>The review included studies on fall prevention interventions for community-dwelling adults aged > 50 years with cognitive impairment. Eligible studies were primary research, including experimental, quasi-experimental, qualitative, and mixed methods designs, with detailed implementation strategies. Systematic reviews, protocols, editorials, opinions, commentaries, and conference papers were excluded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review followed the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness and was reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Five databases were searched for studies published in English after 2000: MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), CINAHL Ultimate (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. Data on implementation strategies and outcomes were extracted and synthesized using the ERIC framework and Proctor's implementation taxonomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one studies met the eligibility criteria. Twenty-four implementation strategies were identified, with 15 directly fitting the ERIC list and 9 additional strategies emerging. The most common strategies were engaging consumers (i.e., patients and family members or caregivers) (n = 13), adapting and tailoring to context (n = 9), and training and educating stakeholders (n = 8). Implementation outcomes were reported inconsistently across studies. Several implementation strategies were often used, but their combined effects on fall prevention outcomes were not clearly reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review indicates that engaging consumers, particularly family members, was the most common implementation strategy to prevent falls. The review also highlights new strategies, such as providing culturally appropriate interventions and using dementia-trained instructors. Lastly, the review identifies the need for clearer reporting of implementation strategies and outcomes in future studies.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD4202454689.</p><p><strong>Spanish abstract: </strong>http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A380.</p>","PeriodicalId":48473,"journal":{"name":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000522","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Falls are a major health concern for older adults, particularly those with cognitive impairment. Many factors contribute to the risk of falls, making it a complex issue to manage.

Aim: This systematic review aimed to identify and describe the implementation strategies used for fall prevention in community-dwelling older people with cognitive impairment.

Eligibility criteria: The review included studies on fall prevention interventions for community-dwelling adults aged > 50 years with cognitive impairment. Eligible studies were primary research, including experimental, quasi-experimental, qualitative, and mixed methods designs, with detailed implementation strategies. Systematic reviews, protocols, editorials, opinions, commentaries, and conference papers were excluded.

Methods: This review followed the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness and was reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Five databases were searched for studies published in English after 2000: MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), CINAHL Ultimate (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. Data on implementation strategies and outcomes were extracted and synthesized using the ERIC framework and Proctor's implementation taxonomy.

Results: Twenty-one studies met the eligibility criteria. Twenty-four implementation strategies were identified, with 15 directly fitting the ERIC list and 9 additional strategies emerging. The most common strategies were engaging consumers (i.e., patients and family members or caregivers) (n = 13), adapting and tailoring to context (n = 9), and training and educating stakeholders (n = 8). Implementation outcomes were reported inconsistently across studies. Several implementation strategies were often used, but their combined effects on fall prevention outcomes were not clearly reported.

Conclusions: This review indicates that engaging consumers, particularly family members, was the most common implementation strategy to prevent falls. The review also highlights new strategies, such as providing culturally appropriate interventions and using dementia-trained instructors. Lastly, the review identifies the need for clearer reporting of implementation strategies and outcomes in future studies.

Review registration: PROSPERO CRD4202454689.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A380.

预防跌倒干预措施在社区居住的老年人认知障碍:系统回顾。
跌倒是老年人的主要健康问题,特别是那些有认知障碍的老年人。许多因素导致跌倒的风险,使其成为一个复杂的问题来管理。目的:本系统综述旨在确定和描述用于预防社区居住的认知障碍老年人跌倒的实施策略。入选标准:本综述纳入了对社区居住的年龄在bb0 - 50岁的认知障碍成年人进行预防跌倒干预的研究。符合条件的研究是初步研究,包括实验、准实验、定性和混合方法设计,并有详细的实施策略。系统评价、方案、社论、意见、评论和会议论文被排除在外。方法:本综述采用JBI方法进行有效性的系统评价,并按照系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目进行报道。检索了5个2000年以后发表的英文研究数据库:MEDLINE (EBSCOhost)、CINAHL Ultimate (EBSCOhost)、PsycINFO (EBSCOhost)、Scopus和Web of Science Core Collection。使用ERIC框架和Proctor实施分类法提取和综合有关实施策略和结果的数据。结果:21项研究符合纳入标准。确定了24项实施战略,其中15项直接符合ERIC清单,另有9项正在出现。最常见的策略是吸引消费者(即患者和家庭成员或护理人员)(n = 13),根据情况进行调整和定制(n = 9),以及培训和教育利益相关者(n = 8)。各研究报告的实施结果不一致。经常使用几种实施策略,但它们对预防跌倒结果的综合效果尚未明确报道。结论:本综述表明,吸引消费者,特别是家庭成员,是预防跌倒最常见的实施策略。该审查还强调了新的战略,例如提供文化上适当的干预措施和使用经过痴呆症培训的指导员。最后,审查确定需要在今后的研究中更清楚地报告执行战略和成果。评审注册:PROSPERO CRD4202454689。西班牙文摘要:http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A380。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信