The effect of evaluator presence in simulated scenarios on basic life support: a randomized study.

Q3 Nursing
Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS Pub Date : 2025-08-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240193.en
Ana Carolina Carraro Tony, Marcos Paulo Schlinz E Silva, André Luiz Silva Alvim, Luciane Ribeiro, Roberta Teixeira Prado, Ricardo Bezerra Cavalcante, Angélica da Conceição Oliveira Coelho, Fábio da Costa Carbogim
{"title":"The effect of evaluator presence in simulated scenarios on basic life support: a randomized study.","authors":"Ana Carolina Carraro Tony, Marcos Paulo Schlinz E Silva, André Luiz Silva Alvim, Luciane Ribeiro, Roberta Teixeira Prado, Ricardo Bezerra Cavalcante, Angélica da Conceição Oliveira Coelho, Fábio da Costa Carbogim","doi":"10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240193.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the theoretical knowledge of nursing students before and after an educational intervention, investigating the impact of the direct and indirect presence of the evaluator on the students' skills in a simulated clinical scenario of basic life support.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>randomized clinical trial, developed between October and December 2023, at a federal university in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Seventy-three fourth-year students were included, with five student losses during the study. The initial sample consisted of 68 students, randomized into a control group (n=33) and an experimental group (n=35). For the experimental group, the evaluator could not be seen during their access to the scenario; for the control group, the presence of the evaluator was visible. To compare the groups, the chi-square test was used for categorical variables, ANOVA for intragroup differences, and Student's t for independent samples for intergroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>there was an increase in the means of the theoretical test (<0.001) between the pre-test and post-test, in both groups. In the evaluation of the students' skills in basic life support, there was no significant difference between the groups (p=0.455).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>there was retention of theoretical knowledge and skills in both groups, regardless of the presence of the evaluator. Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry: RBR-8tvzdr7.</p>","PeriodicalId":35609,"journal":{"name":"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS","volume":"46 ","pages":"e20240193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240193.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the theoretical knowledge of nursing students before and after an educational intervention, investigating the impact of the direct and indirect presence of the evaluator on the students' skills in a simulated clinical scenario of basic life support.

Method: randomized clinical trial, developed between October and December 2023, at a federal university in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Seventy-three fourth-year students were included, with five student losses during the study. The initial sample consisted of 68 students, randomized into a control group (n=33) and an experimental group (n=35). For the experimental group, the evaluator could not be seen during their access to the scenario; for the control group, the presence of the evaluator was visible. To compare the groups, the chi-square test was used for categorical variables, ANOVA for intragroup differences, and Student's t for independent samples for intergroup analysis.

Results: there was an increase in the means of the theoretical test (<0.001) between the pre-test and post-test, in both groups. In the evaluation of the students' skills in basic life support, there was no significant difference between the groups (p=0.455).

Conclusion: there was retention of theoretical knowledge and skills in both groups, regardless of the presence of the evaluator. Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry: RBR-8tvzdr7.

评估者在模拟情景中对基本生命支持的影响:一项随机研究。
目的:评估护生教育干预前后的理论知识水平,探讨评估者的直接和间接存在对学生基本生命支持模拟临床场景技能的影响。方法:随机临床试验,于2023年10月至12月在巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州的一所联邦大学开展。73名四年级学生参与了研究,其中有5名学生在研究期间死亡。初始样本由68名学生组成,随机分为对照组(n=33)和实验组(n=35)。对于实验组,在他们进入场景的过程中,无法看到评估者;对于对照组,评估者的存在是可见的。为比较组间差异,分类变量采用卡方检验,组内差异采用方差分析,独立样本采用Student’st进行组间分析。结果:理论测试的手段有所增加(结论:无论评估者是否在场,两组都有理论知识和技能的保留。巴西临床试验注册:RBR-8tvzdr7。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: A Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul edita e publica a Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem para divulgar a produção científica da Enfermagem e áreas afins. Foi criada em 1976 e atualmente tem periodicidade trimestral.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信