A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laser Auriculotherapy for Musculoskeletal Pain Management: An Assessment of Its Efficacy.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Hernán Andrés de la Barra Ortiz, Nivaldo Parizotto, Mauricio Meyer von Schauensee, Richard Liebano
{"title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laser Auriculotherapy for Musculoskeletal Pain Management: An Assessment of Its Efficacy.","authors":"Hernán Andrés de la Barra Ortiz, Nivaldo Parizotto, Mauricio Meyer von Schauensee, Richard Liebano","doi":"10.1177/27683605251360940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Musculoskeletal pain (MSP) is prevalent and a major cause of disability, highlighting the need for nonpharmacologic treatments. Low-level laser therapy auriculotherapy (LLLT-AT) is emerging as a promising noninvasive approach for MSP management. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of LLLT-AT on MSP patients. <b><i>Method:</i></b> A comprehensive electronic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, PEDro, and Google Scholar (updated on May 3, 2025) identified randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing LLLT-AT with sham, no intervention, or other therapies. Pain intensity was the primary outcome, and disability and pain pressure threshold were secondary. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. The risk of bias among the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2) tool, and the meta-analysis was performed using the mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD), as appropriate. The Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework guided evidence certainty. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Five RCTs were included, with a mean PEDro score of 7 (standard deviation [SD] 0.7). According to Domain 6 of the RoB 2 tool, 80% of trials demonstrated a low overall risk of bias, with evaluators blinding being the primary concern. LLLT-AT significantly reduced pain intensity post-treatment compared with placebo (SMD = 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40-2.30; <i>p</i> < 0.01) and no treatment (SMD = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.00-2.20; <i>p</i> < 0.01), reflecting a large effect size. An increase in the pressure pain threshold was also observed (MD = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.00-1.30; <i>p</i> < 0.01), although this result was limited by small sample sizes. However, the certainty of the evidence was judged as very low-deemed critical for pain intensity outcomes and not important for pressure pain threshold. No adverse events were reported. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> LLLT-AT shows potential for effectively managing MSP, reducing pain intensity, and improving pressure pain threshold. However, further research is needed to strengthen the evidence base due to the limited number of studies and to explore its applicability to other conditions. Dosage recommendations were provided to inform future research and clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27683605251360940","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Musculoskeletal pain (MSP) is prevalent and a major cause of disability, highlighting the need for nonpharmacologic treatments. Low-level laser therapy auriculotherapy (LLLT-AT) is emerging as a promising noninvasive approach for MSP management. Objective: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of LLLT-AT on MSP patients. Method: A comprehensive electronic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, PEDro, and Google Scholar (updated on May 3, 2025) identified randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing LLLT-AT with sham, no intervention, or other therapies. Pain intensity was the primary outcome, and disability and pain pressure threshold were secondary. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. The risk of bias among the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2) tool, and the meta-analysis was performed using the mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD), as appropriate. The Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework guided evidence certainty. Results: Five RCTs were included, with a mean PEDro score of 7 (standard deviation [SD] 0.7). According to Domain 6 of the RoB 2 tool, 80% of trials demonstrated a low overall risk of bias, with evaluators blinding being the primary concern. LLLT-AT significantly reduced pain intensity post-treatment compared with placebo (SMD = 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40-2.30; p < 0.01) and no treatment (SMD = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.00-2.20; p < 0.01), reflecting a large effect size. An increase in the pressure pain threshold was also observed (MD = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.00-1.30; p < 0.01), although this result was limited by small sample sizes. However, the certainty of the evidence was judged as very low-deemed critical for pain intensity outcomes and not important for pressure pain threshold. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: LLLT-AT shows potential for effectively managing MSP, reducing pain intensity, and improving pressure pain threshold. However, further research is needed to strengthen the evidence base due to the limited number of studies and to explore its applicability to other conditions. Dosage recommendations were provided to inform future research and clinical practice.

激光听觉治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛的系统回顾和荟萃分析:评估其疗效。
肌肉骨骼疼痛(MSP)很普遍,是导致残疾的主要原因,强调了非药物治疗的必要性。低水平激光耳疗(LLLT-AT)是一种很有前途的无创MSP治疗方法。目的:本系统综述旨在评价LLLT-AT对MSP患者的影响。方法:对PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、Cochrane Library、CINAHL、ScienceDirect、PEDro和谷歌Scholar(更新于2025年5月3日)进行全面的电子检索,确定了将LLLT-AT与假疗法、无干预疗法或其他疗法进行比较的随机临床试验(rct)。疼痛强度是主要结局,残疾和痛压阈值是次要结局。采用PEDro量表评估方法学质量。采用Cochrane risk of bias 2.0 (RoB 2)工具评估纳入的rct的偏倚风险,并酌情采用均差(MD)或标准化均差(SMD)进行meta分析。推荐、评估、开发和评估框架的分级指导证据确定性。结果:纳入5项随机对照试验,平均PEDro评分为7分(标准差[SD] 0.7)。根据RoB 2工具的域6,80%的试验显示出较低的总体偏倚风险,评估者的盲性是主要关注的问题。与安慰剂相比,LLLT-AT治疗后疼痛强度显著降低(SMD = 1.31;95%置信区间[CI]: 0.40-2.30;p < 0.01)和未治疗(SMD = 1.12;95% ci: 0.00-2.20;P < 0.01),反映了较大的效应量。压痛阈值也有升高(MD = 0.64;95% ci: 0.00-1.30;P < 0.01),但该结果受样本量小的限制。然而,证据的确定性被判定为非常低——对疼痛强度结果至关重要,对压痛阈值不重要。无不良事件报告。结论:LLLT-AT可有效治疗MSP,降低疼痛强度,提高压痛阈值。然而,由于研究数量有限,需要进一步的研究来加强证据基础,并探索其在其他情况下的适用性。为今后的研究和临床实践提供了剂量建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信