[Status analysis of standard methods for detecting pesticide in the air of workplace in China].

Q3 Medicine
D D Cao, L Zhong, Y Ye, X Y Hu
{"title":"[Status analysis of standard methods for detecting pesticide in the air of workplace in China].","authors":"D D Cao, L Zhong, Y Ye, X Y Hu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20240702-00293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article analyzes the current standard methods for detecting occupational hazards of pesticides in the air of workplaces in China, including sampling, pre-treatment, laboratory analysis, as well as the matching status between the minimum quantitative concentration of methods and occupational exposure limits. Among the 46 pesticide occupational hazard factors with occupational exposure limits, only 25 are supported by current valid standard detection methods. The minimum quantitation concentrations given in only 7 standard detection methods are lower than 10% of the occupational exposure limits, which meet the requirements for classified control.This study discusses the problems existing in the current standard methods for detecting pesticide and provides reference for further improving the standard methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":23958,"journal":{"name":"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志","volume":"43 7","pages":"543-546"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20240702-00293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyzes the current standard methods for detecting occupational hazards of pesticides in the air of workplaces in China, including sampling, pre-treatment, laboratory analysis, as well as the matching status between the minimum quantitative concentration of methods and occupational exposure limits. Among the 46 pesticide occupational hazard factors with occupational exposure limits, only 25 are supported by current valid standard detection methods. The minimum quantitation concentrations given in only 7 standard detection methods are lower than 10% of the occupational exposure limits, which meet the requirements for classified control.This study discusses the problems existing in the current standard methods for detecting pesticide and provides reference for further improving the standard methods.

[中国工作场所空气中农药检测标准方法现状分析]。
本文分析了目前中国工作场所空气中农药职业危害检测的标准方法,包括采样、前处理、实验室分析,以及方法的最低定量浓度与职业暴露限值的匹配状况。在具有职业暴露限值的46种农药职业危害因素中,目前有效的标准检测方法支持的仅有25种。只有7种标准检测方法给出的最低定量浓度低于职业暴露限值的10%,满足分类控制的要求。本研究探讨了现行农药检测标准方法中存在的问题,为进一步完善标准方法提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华劳动卫生职业病杂志
中华劳动卫生职业病杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9764
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信