J W Zhu, X Zhong, S J Fu, Q F Huang, R Z Li, M Liu, S B Su, H Chen
{"title":"[Analysis of influencing factors on the protective effect of hearing protectors for noise workers in the petrochemical industry].","authors":"J W Zhu, X Zhong, S J Fu, Q F Huang, R Z Li, M Liu, S B Su, H Chen","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20240229-00076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To Exploring the protective effect of hearing protectors worn by noise workers in the petrochemical industry and the factors affecting the protective effect of hearing protectors. <b>Methods:</b> From June 2021 to July 2023, 929 petrochemical workers were selected as the research subjects through cluster sampling. The noise exposure of workers and the usage of two types of hearing protectors were surveyed through questionnaire surveys and on-site occupational hygiene surveys. The protective effect of hearing protectors were evaluated by testing the PAR of workers. If the noise exposure value of workers minus the PAR value was less than 85 dB (A) , it was considered passed. Otherwise, it was considered not passed. The passing rate of the protective effect test of hearing protectors was analyzed through chi square test and the influencing factors for the effectiveness of workers hearing protectors in test were explored through single factor analysis and logistic regression models. <b>Results:</b> Among the research subjects, 80.5% of workers (748/929) had noise exposure levels greater than 85 dB (A) . The passing rate (80.9%) of the earmuff is greater than that of the earplug (52.6%) , and the median of PAR of the earmuff is 22 (16, 25) , which is greater than that of the earplug 15 (3, 22) dB dB, with a statistically significant difference (<i>P</i><0.001) . Univariate analysis and logistic regression models showed that length of service, exposure level to noise, and wearing comfort were the influencing factors of earplug protection effect (<i>P</i><0.05) , while wearing comfort was the influencing factor of earmuff protection effect (<i>P</i><0.05) . <b>Conclusion:</b> This study indicates that the protective effect of hearing protectors on workers in the petrochemical enterprise is poor, and the protective effect of earmuffs is greater than that of earplugs. Working experience, noise exposure level, and wearing comfort are the influencing factors of earplug protection effect, while wearing comfort is the influencing factor of earplug protection effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":23958,"journal":{"name":"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志","volume":"43 7","pages":"513-517"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20240229-00076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To Exploring the protective effect of hearing protectors worn by noise workers in the petrochemical industry and the factors affecting the protective effect of hearing protectors. Methods: From June 2021 to July 2023, 929 petrochemical workers were selected as the research subjects through cluster sampling. The noise exposure of workers and the usage of two types of hearing protectors were surveyed through questionnaire surveys and on-site occupational hygiene surveys. The protective effect of hearing protectors were evaluated by testing the PAR of workers. If the noise exposure value of workers minus the PAR value was less than 85 dB (A) , it was considered passed. Otherwise, it was considered not passed. The passing rate of the protective effect test of hearing protectors was analyzed through chi square test and the influencing factors for the effectiveness of workers hearing protectors in test were explored through single factor analysis and logistic regression models. Results: Among the research subjects, 80.5% of workers (748/929) had noise exposure levels greater than 85 dB (A) . The passing rate (80.9%) of the earmuff is greater than that of the earplug (52.6%) , and the median of PAR of the earmuff is 22 (16, 25) , which is greater than that of the earplug 15 (3, 22) dB dB, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.001) . Univariate analysis and logistic regression models showed that length of service, exposure level to noise, and wearing comfort were the influencing factors of earplug protection effect (P<0.05) , while wearing comfort was the influencing factor of earmuff protection effect (P<0.05) . Conclusion: This study indicates that the protective effect of hearing protectors on workers in the petrochemical enterprise is poor, and the protective effect of earmuffs is greater than that of earplugs. Working experience, noise exposure level, and wearing comfort are the influencing factors of earplug protection effect, while wearing comfort is the influencing factor of earplug protection effect.
目的:探讨石化行业噪声作业人员佩戴听力保护器的防护效果及影响听力保护器防护效果的因素。方法:采用整群抽样的方法,选取2021年6月至2023年7月石化行业从业人员929人作为研究对象。通过问卷调查和现场职业卫生调查,对工人的噪声暴露和两种听力保护器的使用情况进行调查。通过测试工人的PAR来评价听力保护器的保护作用。如果工人的噪声暴露值减去PAR值小于85 dB (A),则视为通过。否则,被认为未通过。通过卡方检验分析听力保护器保护效果测试的通过率,通过单因素分析和logistic回归模型探讨工人听力保护器在测试中有效性的影响因素。结果:在研究对象中,80.5%的工人(748/929)的噪声暴露水平大于85 dB (A)。耳套的合格率(80.9%)大于耳塞的合格率(52.6%),耳套的PAR中位数为22(16,25),大于耳塞的15 (3,22)dB dB,差异有统计学意义(ppp)。结论:本研究表明,石化企业听力保护器对工人的保护效果较差,耳套的保护效果大于耳塞。工作经验、噪声暴露程度、佩戴舒适度是耳塞保护效果的影响因素,而佩戴舒适度是耳塞保护效果的影响因素。