Understanding Nonenrolment in Add-on Yoga Trial Among Patients with Substance Use Disorders in a Tertiary Care Setting.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Siddharth Sarkar, Pinki Sevda, Parvender Singh Negi, Amit Kumar, Meeteileima Khumukcham, Rizwana Quraishi, Anju Dhawan
{"title":"Understanding Nonenrolment in Add-on Yoga Trial Among Patients with Substance Use Disorders in a Tertiary Care Setting.","authors":"Siddharth Sarkar, Pinki Sevda, Parvender Singh Negi, Amit Kumar, Meeteileima Khumukcham, Rizwana Quraishi, Anju Dhawan","doi":"10.1177/27683605251366983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Yoga is increasingly recognized for its therapeutic benefits in managing chronic medical and psychiatric conditions, including substance use disorders. Despite its growing clinical acceptance, challenges remain regarding its real-world feasibility, particularly in medically oriented settings. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> This analysis aimed to explore reasons for nonparticipation in a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of add-on yoga (dhyana meditation) in patients with opioid dependence who were stable on pharmacological treatment. <b><i>Design, Setting, Participants, and Interventions:</i></b> This sub-analysis was part of a larger randomized controlled trial of add-on yoga conducted at a tertiary care addiction treatment center in north India. Patients on stable doses of medications for opioid use disorder treatment were approached for participation in yoga that included 7 consecutive days of training followed by yoga practice or wait list control. <b><i>Main Outcome Measures:</i></b> The main outcome measures for the present analysis were the reasons for nonparticipation. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Only 24% (<i>n</i> = 120) of approached participants consented to join the trial. The most common reason for refusal was lack of time (73.2%), followed by logistical challenges and lack of familiarity with yoga. Education level was significantly associated with participation (<i>p</i> = 0.018). While 80.3% of nonparticipants believed yoga could be beneficial, few expressed interest in online formats or reduced-frequency visits, indicating limited practical feasibility. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Despite a general belief in yoga's benefits, participation was limited by time and logistical constraints. Future interventions should consider hybrid or digital formats, flexible scheduling, and tailored recruitment strategies. Understanding nonparticipation reasons can enhance engagement and guide future yoga-based trials in clinical populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27683605251366983","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Yoga is increasingly recognized for its therapeutic benefits in managing chronic medical and psychiatric conditions, including substance use disorders. Despite its growing clinical acceptance, challenges remain regarding its real-world feasibility, particularly in medically oriented settings. Objectives: This analysis aimed to explore reasons for nonparticipation in a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of add-on yoga (dhyana meditation) in patients with opioid dependence who were stable on pharmacological treatment. Design, Setting, Participants, and Interventions: This sub-analysis was part of a larger randomized controlled trial of add-on yoga conducted at a tertiary care addiction treatment center in north India. Patients on stable doses of medications for opioid use disorder treatment were approached for participation in yoga that included 7 consecutive days of training followed by yoga practice or wait list control. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures for the present analysis were the reasons for nonparticipation. Results: Only 24% (n = 120) of approached participants consented to join the trial. The most common reason for refusal was lack of time (73.2%), followed by logistical challenges and lack of familiarity with yoga. Education level was significantly associated with participation (p = 0.018). While 80.3% of nonparticipants believed yoga could be beneficial, few expressed interest in online formats or reduced-frequency visits, indicating limited practical feasibility. Conclusion: Despite a general belief in yoga's benefits, participation was limited by time and logistical constraints. Future interventions should consider hybrid or digital formats, flexible scheduling, and tailored recruitment strategies. Understanding nonparticipation reasons can enhance engagement and guide future yoga-based trials in clinical populations.

了解三级医疗机构中物质使用障碍患者不参加附加瑜伽试验的原因。
背景:瑜伽在治疗慢性医学和精神疾病,包括物质使用障碍方面的治疗效益越来越得到认可。尽管临床接受度越来越高,但在现实世界的可行性方面仍然存在挑战,特别是在医学导向的环境中。目的:本分析旨在探讨不参加一项随机对照试验的原因,该试验评估附加瑜伽(禅坐冥想)对阿片类药物依赖患者的疗效,这些患者对药物治疗稳定。设计、环境、参与者和干预措施:该亚分析是在印度北部三级护理成瘾治疗中心进行的一项更大的附加瑜伽随机对照试验的一部分。接受稳定剂量阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的患者参与瑜伽,包括连续7天的训练,然后是瑜伽练习或等待名单控制。主要结局指标:本分析的主要结局指标为不参与的原因。结果:只有24% (n = 120)的接近参与者同意加入试验。最常见的拒绝原因是没有时间(73.2%),其次是物流问题和不熟悉瑜伽。教育水平与参与显著相关(p = 0.018)。尽管80.3%的非参与者认为瑜伽有益,但很少有人表示对在线形式或减少访问频率感兴趣,这表明实际可行性有限。结论:尽管人们普遍相信瑜伽的好处,但由于时间和后勤方面的限制,人们的参与受到了限制。未来的干预措施应考虑混合或数字格式,灵活的调度和量身定制的招聘策略。了解不参与的原因可以提高参与度,并指导未来在临床人群中进行基于瑜伽的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信